Go Small: Eager to Boost Market Share, Kia Again Hints at a Tiny Ute

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

If Hyundai can do it, why not Kia? After the Korean automaker’s corporate sibling launched the A-segment Venue at this month’s New York Auto Show, Kia Motors is again hinting at a small, sub-Sportage utility vehicles that’s yet to arrive.

Unlike the Venue, however, Kia’s planned entry won’t be of the front-drive-only variety.

Speaking to Wards Auto, Kia Motors America’s chief operating officer, Michael Cole, says a small, all-wheel-drive crossover is “in our product strategy for the future.” It’s something we’ve heard before.

Last fall, Kia Motors Corp. CEO Han-Woo Park said his company planned to bolster the brand’s U.S. utility vehicle presence in the hopes of boosting flagging sales and delivering a healthier SUV-to-car-ratio. At the time, light trucks represented only 41 percent of Kia’s U.S. volume, and the continued lack of a subcompact (or smaller) offering continues to hurt the brand. Park wants to see a 60:40 mix.

“We expect our performance in the U.S. market to rebound soon,” Park said.

The unnamed small crossover will arrive in the second half of 2019, Park said, hot on the heels of the Telluride SUV. Park’s words, and Cole’s omissions, seem to point to a wholly new vehicle, rather than an AWD version of the Kia Soul, which switches to the GB platform used by the AWD-capable Hyundai Kona for 2020.

Last fall’s report claimed the vehicle will be based on Kia’s SP Concept, which shares its mechanicals with the overseas Hyundai Creta. Since then, Kia has shown off its SP Signature concept — a small crossover based on the next-generation Creta’s SP2i platform. Slightly longer than the Venue, the Kia and its Creta stablemate would be available with AWD. Kia also sells the Stonic overseas, a subcompact crossover that borrows its platform from the Kona, but the Stonic — like the Soul — is only available in front-drive guise.

Despite subcompact, FWD domestic offerings like the Nissan Kicks and Toyota C-HR, Kia feels the need to offer more capability in its small ute. The Soul already works well for the brand, generating boffo sales that show no signs of flagging.

Speaking of that model, Cole said “it plays the part of sort of getting into that (small) SUV (sector), and also we can compete in some of the markets as a (car)…it fits in both. It does that job for us.” The Soul is not in need of additional buyer appeal; Kia could generate more profit from a separate AWD model with a slightly higher price point.

As for Kia’s U.S. sales, those are looking up. While last year saw the brand top 2017’s sales tally by just five vehicles, the first quarter of 2019 shows sales up 8 percent, aided by the addition of the Telluride.

[Images: Kia Motors]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
 3 comments
  • Vulpine Vulpine on Apr 30, 2019

    The original definition of 'ute' was a car-based pickup such as the Ranchero, El Camino or even the new VW Tarok concept. If it's a fully-enclosed body, then it's not a 'ute' but a crossover or SUV. Hyundai/Kia is in need of a true pickup or 'ute'.

  • NN NN on Apr 30, 2019

    looks like a Skoda, and that's not a bad thing. Kia seems to play the Skoda role in the US market: good design and more value than other brands.

    • Inside Looking Out Inside Looking Out on Apr 30, 2019

      Why do you think looking like Skoda is not bad thing but looking like Western brand like e.g. Land Rover, Mercedes or Ford is a bad thing? Do you mean Skoda does not deserve intellectual property protection just because it is an Eastern European brand? And BTW it does not look like Skoda.

  • Doug brockman There will be many many people living in apartments without dedicated charging facilities in future who will need personal vehicles to get to work and school and for whom mass transit will be an annoying inconvenience
  • Jeff Self driving cars are not ready for prime time.
  • Lichtronamo Watch as the non-us based automakers shift more production to Mexico in the future.
  • 28-Cars-Later " Electrek recently dug around in Tesla’s online parts catalog and found that the windshield costs a whopping $1,900 to replace.To be fair, that’s around what a Mercedes S-Class or Rivian windshield costs, but the Tesla’s glass is unique because of its shape. It’s also worth noting that most insurance plans have glass replacement options that can make the repair a low- or zero-cost issue. "Now I understand why my insurance is so high despite no claims for years and about 7,500 annual miles between three cars.
  • AMcA My theory is that that when the Big 3 gave away the store to the UAW in the last contract, there was a side deal in which the UAW promised to go after the non-organized transplant plants. Even the UAW understands that if the wage differential gets too high it's gonna kill the golden goose.
Next