Chevrolet Traverse Update: Huge Crossover Ditches Small Engine

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

An “odd choice.” That’s how TTAC’s Timothy Cain characterized the Chevrolet Traverse RS when it first appeared in late 2017.

Powered by a turbocharged 2.0-liter four-cylinder, the apparently sportier version of Chevy’s full-size, three-row Traverse was a mid-range offering with blacked-out clothing that hardly improved on the V6 model’s fuel economy. Available only in front-drive guise, the four-banger Traverse returned 1 mpg less on the highway than its 3.6-liter FWD sibling, the result of the six-cylinder’s loftier horsepower count. Combined fuel economy improved by only 1 mpg by ticking the RS box.

That was then, and this is now. Chevy’s dropping the 2.0T Traverse.

According to GM Authority, a mid-year change sees the engine disappear from the RS trim, replaced by the model’s now sole powerplant: GM’s trusty 3.6-liter, mated to the same nine-speed employed by both the V6 and 4-cyl Traverses.

To refresh your memory, the turbo Traverse brewed 257 horsepower and 295 lb-ft of torque — 53 fewer horses than the 3.6-liter model, but 29 additional foot-pounds. That low-displacement, low-end grunt allowed the Traverse to at least claim a 20 mpg city fuel economy figure, which happened to be just 2 mpg below its combined rating.

GM dresses up its RS with blacked-out trim and 20-inch wheels, adding the LT Premium Package and Convenience and Driver Confidence Package for good measure. After-destination MSRP for a FWD RS is $44,295. In other words, no change from the four-cylinder’s 2019 starting price.

While the older LTG engine is no longer available to order, there’s no word on a new downsized Traverse mill waiting in the wings. GM has a new four-cylinder in the form of the LSY, but that engine, found in the Cadillac AT4 and refreshed, 2020 GMC Acadia, is down on power compared to the older engine family. The reality might be that GM already sells plenty of Traverses and didn’t need a configuration with a low take rate to complicate matters.

Traverse sales rose 18.7 percent in 2018, making it the third-best selling Chevrolet behind the Silverado and Equinox. The first three months of 2019 saw sales fall 10.4 percent.

[Image: General Motors]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 20 comments
  • RS RS on Apr 22, 2019

    "...trusty 3.6-liter" ???

    • See 1 previous
    • Gtem Gtem on Apr 23, 2019

      @PrincipalDan Nothing modern with DI+VVT chain driven DOHC etc is an "anvil" anymore IMO. Simply too optimized for efficiency/power at the expense of basically everything else.

  • Lostboy Lostboy on Apr 23, 2019

    didn't i read somewhere about a 2.4 turbo in a silverado? why not transplant that engine into this vehicle? (totally guessing about this however)

  • ToolGuy First picture: I realize that opinions vary on the height of modern trucks, but that entry door on the building is 80 inches tall and hits just below the headlights. Does anyone really believe this is reasonable?Second picture: I do not believe that is a good parking spot to be able to access the bed storage. More specifically, how do you plan to unload topsoil with the truck parked like that? Maybe you kids are taller than me.
  • ToolGuy The other day I attempted to check the engine oil in one of my old embarrassing vehicles and I guess the red shop towel I used wasn't genuine Snap-on (lots of counterfeits floating around) plus my driveway isn't completely level and long story short, the engine seized 3 minutes later.No more used cars for me, and nothing but dealer service from here on in (the journalists were right).
  • Doughboy Wow, Merc knocks it out of the park with their naming convention… again. /s
  • Doughboy I’ve seen car bras before, but never car beards. ZZ Top would be proud.
  • Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.
Next