Call the Governor: Volvo to Tamp Down Its Top Speed

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

In jurisdictions that allow motorists some semblance of freedom (*cough* not future Europe *cough*), speed limiters aren’t a common topic of conversation. But they do exist, and many an American pickup owner has hit the governor while passing motorists in open territory.

Volvo Cars isn’t concerned about your gross vehicle weight rating, tire speed rating, or any of that stuff. In the interest of safety, the automaker plans to introduce a speed ceiling for all of its vehicles, even if it means pissing off Germans.

Speaking to Reuters, Volvo Cars CEO Hakan Samuelsson said that, starting in 2020, his company’s vehicles will back off after hitting 112 mph (180 km/h). This happens to be the same speed my Chevrolet Corsica couldn’t nudge past back in high school.

The automaker’s new speed limit is another plank in its tech-heavy Vision 2020 mandate, which seeks to eliminate deaths and injuries in Volvo vehicles by next year. Volvo’s CEO suggested that all the tech in the world can’t save a passenger if the vehicle is travelling too fast.

“We’ve realized that to close the gap we have to focus more on the human factors,” he said.

Perhaps taking a cue from zealous European lawmakers, the automaker is also exploring speed limiters that would kick in in high-pedestrian areas like school zones. This technology would limit the Volvo’s speed to that of the posted speed limit until it leaves the geo-fenced area.

Before that happens, however, Volvo expects to have cameras spying on its drivers, monitoring their faces for signs of drowsiness (or booziness). Cadillac’s Super Cruise driver-assist features already uses such a system.

When asked whether the new speed limiters would hurt sales in speed-happy Germany, home of the famed Autobahn, Samuelsson seemed unconcerned.

“We cannot please everybody, but we think we will attract new customers,” he said. “I think Volvo customers in Germany will appreciate that we’re doing something about safety.”

[Image: Volvo Cars]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 46 comments
  • Jfk-usaf Jfk-usaf on Mar 05, 2019

    It's just over management of the end customer. I love my 2017 XC90 don't get me wrong but Volvo needs to understand that Americans like to make their own choices and don't like to be managed. An example: I hated it when they took my temp gauge away. They gave it back to me in my 2015 XC60 and then took it away again in my 2017 XC90. I like to have all the data in front of me and keep off the throttle until the car starts to warm up. Their engineers say that that's not necessary. I don't care if its necessary! I want the data so I can decide on my own course of action. Most cars I believe limit themselves around 130mph and that's what we are used to. That's the norm and there's no reason to change it. I know that my car will go 130 if I ask it to. I never would but I get to make that decision. This whole thing reminds me of 80s car speedos that stopped at 85mph. Maybe Volvo could speak to the number of people that die when their Volvos were driven between 112 and 130mph..... another thought. Make the change and don't advertise it. I'd probably never know but now you've pissed me off and I don't want to buy your cars anymore.

  • DC Bruce DC Bruce on Mar 05, 2019

    Well, this is amusing and interesting. Of course -- with the possible exception of Germans -- most car buyers don't come close to exploring the top speed potential of their vehicles. But they buy power anyway. Volvo's implicit message is: "don't waste your money; because we're not going to let you use it anyway!" It will be interesting to see how that turns out. As the driver of a governed 420 hp half ton pickup truck, I have kissed but not slammed into the 98 mph governed top speed. In a number of western states, the speed limit on certain highways is 80 or 85. So, it's not that hard to find the limit if you're say, shooting the gap between a slow-moving truck and a left-lane bandit. And, FTW, on those highways, I do the posted limit not the usual 5 mph over.

  • Analoggrotto Does anyone seriously listen to this?
  • Thomas Same here....but keep in mind that EVs are already much more efficient than ICE vehicles. They need to catch up in all the other areas you mentioned.
  • Analoggrotto It's great to see TTAC kicking up the best for their #1 corporate sponsor. Keep up the good work guys.
  • John66ny Title about self driving cars, linked podcast about headlight restoration. Some relationship?
  • Jeff JMII--If I did not get my Maverick my next choice was a Santa Cruz. They are different but then they are both compact pickups the only real compact pickups on the market. I am glad to hear that the Santa Cruz will have knobs and buttons on it for 2025 it would be good if they offered a hybrid as well. When I looked at both trucks it was less about brand loyalty and more about price, size, and features. I have owned 2 gm made trucks in the past and liked both but gm does not make a true compact truck and neither does Ram, Toyota, or Nissan. The Maverick was the only Ford product that I wanted. If I wanted a larger truck I would have kept either my 99 S-10 extended cab with a 2.2 I-4 5 speed or my 08 Isuzu I-370 4 x 4 with the 3.7 I-5, tow package, heated leather seats, and other niceties and it road like a luxury vehicle. I believe the demand is there for other manufacturers to make compact pickups. The proposed hybrid Toyota Stout would be a great truck. Subaru has experience making small trucks and they could make a very competitive compact truck and Subaru has a great all wheel drive system. Chevy has a great compact pickup offered in South America called the Montana which gm could make in North America and offered in the US and Canada. Ram has a great little compact truck offered in South America as well. Compact trucks are a great vehicle for those who want an open bed for hauling but what a smaller more affordable efficient practical vehicle.
Next