Tesla Board Gains Two Watchdogs As Musk Seeks a Way Out of His Cave Mess

by Steph Willems

Published: December 28th, 2018

tesla board gains two watchdogs as musk seeks a way out of his cave mess

Tesla’s nine-member board now numbers eleven, with many shareholders hoping that the addition of two independent directors — a key directive of Tesla’s SEC settlement — helps keep a lid on CEO Elon Musk’s stock-rocking shenanigans.

Whether or not the two new members can actually do this remains to be seen. Musk continued antagonizing the Securities and Exchange Commission even after agreeing to the settlement that saw him removed as chairman, and he insists no one’s vetting his tweets. Speaking of ill-considered tweets, Musk’s lawyers claim the British cave diver suing Musk for defamation should just let it go.

Joining the board are Larry Ellison, co-founder of Oracle Corp., and Kathleen Wilson-Thompson, global PR chief for Walgreens Boots Alliance Inc., Automotive News reports. The two will take their place at a table roundly viewed as being stocked with staunch Musk ~~lapdogs~~ loyalists — members who stuck by their CEO after his infamous go-private tweet of August 7th.

Many suggest that Ellison may be no different. In October, Ellison told an audience, “I’m very close friends with Elon Musk and I’m a big investor in Tesla.”

As part of the SEC settlement, which cost Tesla and Musk $20 million apiece, Musk transferred his chairman title to telecom exec and Tesla board member Robyn Denholm in November. He’s not allowed to wear that hat again for three years.

In a 60 Minutes interview airing earlier this month, Musk suggested his power remained undiluted and downplayed his influence on the company’s stock.

Musk’s capricious tweets might have earned him a slapdown from the U.S. securities regulator, but it also brought him perhaps the most avoidable lawsuit in history. Repeatedly, Musk tweeted that British diver Vernon Unsworth — a key figure in this year’s cave rescue of a trapped Thai soccer team — was a pedophile, providing no evidence for the claim. You’ll recall that this came after Unsworth suggested Musk should stick his homemade submarine where the sun don’t shine. Like a robin tugging a squirming worm from the fresh spring soil, Musk kept up the attacks, at one point daring Unsworth to sue him.

Unsworth filed suit in September, accusing Musk of libel and slander. He’s seeking at least $75,000 in damages.

On Wednesday, Musk’s lawyers filed a motion to dismiss the suit, essentially claiming that Twitter is silly and people say dumb things on it. And besides, no one took Musk seriously. According to CNBC, Musk’s legal representation said the CEO took to Twitter (“a social networking website infamous for invective and hyperbole”) to respond to Unsworth’s “indefensible and baseless attacks.”

Unsworth’s lawyer rejects this argument, claiming he expects the case to move forward.

[Image: Tesla]

#CorporateGovernance #ElonMusk #LawAndOrder #Lawsuits #Tesla

Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments

Join the conversation

2 of 10 comments

Iamwho2k on Dec 28, 2018

If a $20 million penalty won't get this guy off of Twitter, asking $75,000 is way too low. Add three zeroes to the end and maybe Elon *might* wise up.

Like Reply
Art Vandelay on Dec 30, 2018

The way out is easy...publicly apologize to the dude, show sincerity by hanging up the Twitter account afterwards, settle the lawsuit and walk away a bit wiser.

Like Reply

Recent Comments

MaintenanceCosts Nobody here seems to acknowledge that there are multiple use cases for cars.Some people spend all their time driving all over the country and need every mile and minute of time savings. ICE cars are better for them right now.Some people only drive locally and fly when they travel. For them, there's probably a range number that works, and they don't really need more. For the uses for which we use our EV, that would be around 150 miles. The other thing about a low range requirement is it can make 120V charging viable. If you don't drive more than an average of about 40 miles/day, you can probably get enough electrons through a wall outlet. We spent over two years charging our Bolt only through 120V, while our house was getting rebuilt, and never had an issue.Those are extremes. There are all sorts of use cases in between, which probably represent the majority of drivers. For some users, what's needed is more range. But I think for most users, what's needed is better charging. Retrofit apartment garages like Tim's with 240V outlets at every spot. Install more L3 chargers in supermarket parking lots and alongside gas stations. Make chargers that work like Tesla Superchargers as ubiquitous as gas stations, and EV charging will not be an issue for most users.
MaintenanceCosts I don't have an opinion on whether any one plant unionizing is the right answer, but the employees sure need to have the right to organize. Unions or the credible threat of unionization are the only thing, history has proven, that can keep employers honest. Without it, we've seen over and over, the employers have complete power over the workers and feel free to exploit the workers however they see fit. (And don't tell me "oh, the workers can just leave" - in an oligopolistic industry, working conditions quickly converge, and there's not another employer right around the corner.)
Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh [h3]Wake me up when it is a 1989 635Csi with a M88/3[/h3]
BrandX "I can charge using the 240V outlets, sure, but it’s slow."No it's not. That's what all home chargers use - 240V.
Jalop1991 does the odometer represent itself in an analog fashion? Will the numbers roll slowly and stop wherever, or do they just blink to the next number like any old boring modern car?