Too Warm: Ford Recalls Nearly 900,000 F-150s Over Block Heater Fault

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Harnessing the magic of electricity to keep your engine block toasty is a better option than crossing your fingers and saying a silent prayer before turning the key (or pressing the button) on cold mornings. Unfortunately for Ford F-150 owners living in northern climes, the block heater residing beneath their truck’s hood might pose a danger to their vehicle — and perhaps their house.

Hoping to remedy a fire risk, Ford Motor Company has issued a recall on roughly 874,000 late-model F-150s in North America.

The recall covers F-150s from the 2015 to 2019 model years, as well as Super Duty models from the 2017 to 2019 model years. Not surprisingly, Canada sees a significant share of the recalled block heater-equipped vehicles — 463,793 in that frigid country, with the remaining 410,289 located in the United States and federal territories. Of these vehicles, Ford estimates 6 percent have the defect.

For owners, the risk only exists when the vehicle’s plugged in. The recall notice states that “water and corrosive contaminant intrusion into the block heater cable’s splice connector could cause corrosion and damage to the connector. Prolonged corrosion in the cable splice connector can cause a resistive short, inoperative engine block heater, and/or tripping of household breakers or GFCI equipped outlets while the vehicle is parked and the block heater is plugged in.”

Certain factors increase the likelihood of a resistive short, including the angle of the connection, its location, and duration of exposure to road salt. A resistive short, as Ford says, “can increase the risk of overheated or melted wiring and fire.”

Trucks built before and after the recalled batch have either grease applied to the splice connector or a different routing for the cables and orientation of the connector. The manufacturer says cables on recalled vehicles will be examined for signs of damage or corrosion; if everything looks fine, dealers will apply dielectric grease to the connections. Owner notification begins January 7th.

The automaker says it’s aware of three fires caused by the defect, with “minor property damage” reported in another incident. Owners of trucks with corroded connectors face a number of tell-tale signs. According to the automaker, the “block heater may become inoperative, the household breaker or outlet GFCI may trip, the user may hear buzzing or sizzling noise, or observe smoke and/or sparks when the cable is plugged into a wall outlet.”

Ford claims the afflicted half-tons rolled out of the company’s Dearborn Truck Plant between March 18, 2014 and November 17, 2018, while Kansas City Assembly built its share of the tally from August 21st, 2014 to November 17th, 2018. Recalled Super Duty trucks left Ohio Assembly between February 5th, 2016 and November 17th, 2018, and the automaker’s Kentucky Truck Plant from October 8th, 2015, to November 17th, 2018.

If your truck’s suddenly causing you a bit of worry, Ford is reachable at 1-866-436-7332. The reference number for this recall is 18S45.

[Image: Ford Motor Company]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 37 comments
  • Ltcmgm78 It depends on whether or not the union is a help or a hindrance to the manufacturer and workers. A union isn't needed if the manufacturer takes care of its workers.
  • Honda1 Unions were needed back in the early days, not needed know. There are plenty of rules and regulations and government agencies that keep companies in line. It's just a money grad and nothing more. Fain is a punk!
  • 1995 SC If the necessary number of employees vote to unionize then yes, they should be unionized. That's how it works.
  • Sobhuza Trooper That Dave Thomas fella sounds like the kind of twit who is oh-so-quick to tell us how easy and fun the bus is for any and all of your personal transportation needs. The time to get to and from the bus stop is never a concern. The time waiting for the bus is never a concern. The time waiting for a connection (if there is one) is never a concern. The weather is never a concern. Whatever you might be carrying or intend to purchase is never a concern. Nope, Boo Cars! Yeah Buses! Buses rule!Needless to say, these twits don't actual take the damn bus.
  • MaintenanceCosts Nobody here seems to acknowledge that there are multiple use cases for cars.Some people spend all their time driving all over the country and need every mile and minute of time savings. ICE cars are better for them right now.Some people only drive locally and fly when they travel. For them, there's probably a range number that works, and they don't really need more. For the uses for which we use our EV, that would be around 150 miles. The other thing about a low range requirement is it can make 120V charging viable. If you don't drive more than an average of about 40 miles/day, you can probably get enough electrons through a wall outlet. We spent over two years charging our Bolt only through 120V, while our house was getting rebuilt, and never had an issue.Those are extremes. There are all sorts of use cases in between, which probably represent the majority of drivers. For some users, what's needed is more range. But I think for most users, what's needed is better charging. Retrofit apartment garages like Tim's with 240V outlets at every spot. Install more L3 chargers in supermarket parking lots and alongside gas stations. Make chargers that work like Tesla Superchargers as ubiquitous as gas stations, and EV charging will not be an issue for most users.
Next