Mercedes-Benz GLE Adopts New Platform for 2019, Doesn't Skip Leg Day

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

The pride of Tuscaloosa is getting a very German revamp for its next generation, adopting evolutionary changes in design while slipping in some new tech that only reveals itself to the driver.

First gracing our shores in 1997, Mercedes-Benz’s GLE debuted as the ML320, finding fans in successful realtors everywhere. Since then, M-B has made sure not to push the the model’s boundaries too much, leaving much of the experimentation to its Mercedes-AMG division. It’s unlikely return buyers will find much to hate about the 2019 version, unless they’re particularly averse to six-pot engines with cylinders arranged all in a row.

Revealed for the first time Tuesday, the new GLE hops to the automaker’s Modular High Architecture platform, promising reductions in weight and an increase in stiffness. Equally as notable, perhaps even more, is the model’s 48-volt electrical system, which technically classifies this vehicle as a mild hybrid. A public debut takes place at October’s Paris auto show.

As reported by Automotive News Europe, the GLE’s wheelbase grows just over 3 inches, improving cabin volume and making an optional third row a possibility. The base engine is a 3.0-liter inline-six generating 367 horsepower, hooked up to the aforementioned mild hybrid system for electrical boost during acceleration (“EQ Boost,” in well-branded Mercedes-Benz parlance). Some 22 extra ponies and an undisclosed amount of torque can be drawn from this system for brief periods.

In the U.S., the current GLE range starts with the GLE400 and its standard twin-turbo 3.0-liter V6. That mill, hooked to a seven-speed automatic, provides 329 hp and 354 lb-ft.

“At a later stage a plug-in hybrid variant with a particularly long range will be added to the drive portfolio,” Mercedes-Benz claims.

While the GLE’s outward looks won’t cause rubbernecking pedestrians to walk into traffic, it isn’t likely to offend the brand faithful. The grille opening grows larger and rounder, with the lower air opening adopting a variation of the dog bone shape seen on other models. A slipperier body means coefficient of drag drops to a low 0.29, further aiding fuel economy gains (whatever those might be).

Beneath the SUV, the automaker’s in-house adaptive suspension system draws power from the 48-volt system to adjust damping rates for each wheel, individually. It should help keep things level when the going gets rough. Mercedes-Benz calls the new setup E-Active Body Control.

Inside, drivers gain larger display screens and a color, high-resolution head-up display. No longer does the center stack host an iPad-like screen poking up above the dash. The automaker’s next-generation MBUX virtual assistant now responds to speech commands, as well as hand and arm gestures. (That latter capability is something we’d like to see in action.)

Further details, as well as pricing, will come closer to the GLE’s early 2019 launch date in the U.S.

[Images: Daimler AG]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 22 comments
  • Bd2 Bd2 on Sep 12, 2018

    Aesthetically (sheetmetal-wise), the GLE was the worst of the MB CUVs. Guess there is some improvement, but that's not saying much. The worst is the greenhouse where it looks like the cargo area/hatch was tacked onto the back of a sedan.

  • SPPPP SPPPP on Sep 12, 2018

    Larger screens inside. Oh ... yay...

  • Jeff JMII--If I did not get my Maverick my next choice was a Santa Cruz. They are different but then they are both compact pickups the only real compact pickups on the market. I am glad to hear that the Santa Cruz will have knobs and buttons on it for 2025 it would be good if they offered a hybrid as well. When I looked at both trucks it was less about brand loyalty and more about price, size, and features. I have owned 2 gm made trucks in the past and liked both but gm does not make a true compact truck and neither does Ram, Toyota, or Nissan. The Maverick was the only Ford product that I wanted. If I wanted a larger truck I would have kept either my 99 S-10 extended cab with a 2.2 I-4 5 speed or my 08 Isuzu I-370 4 x 4 with the 3.7 I-5, tow package, heated leather seats, and other niceties and it road like a luxury vehicle. I believe the demand is there for other manufacturers to make compact pickups. The proposed hybrid Toyota Stout would be a great truck. Subaru has experience making small trucks and they could make a very competitive compact truck and Subaru has a great all wheel drive system. Chevy has a great compact pickup offered in South America called the Montana which gm could be made in North America and offered in the US and Canada. Ram has a great little compact truck offered in South America as well.
  • Groza George I don’t care about GM’s anything. They have not had anything of interest or of reasonable quality in a generation and now solely stay on business to provide UAW retirement while they slowly move production to Mexico.
  • Arthur Dailey We have a lease coming due in October and no intention of buying the vehicle when the lease is up.Trying to decide on a replacement vehicle our preferences are the Maverick, Subaru Forester and Mazda CX-5 or CX-30.Unfortunately both the Maverick and Subaru are thin on the ground. Would prefer a Maverick with the hybrid, but the wife has 2 'must haves' those being heated seats and blind spot monitoring. That requires a factory order on the Maverick bringing Canadian price in the mid $40k range, and a delivery time of TBD. For the Subaru it looks like we would have to go up 2 trim levels to get those and that also puts it into the mid $40k range.Therefore are contemplating take another 2 or 3 year lease. Hoping that vehicle supply and prices stabilize and purchasing a hybrid or electric when that lease expires. By then we will both be retired, so that vehicle could be a 'forever car'. And an increased 'carbon tax' just kicked in this week in most of Canada. Prices are currently $1.72 per litre. Which according to my rough calculations is approximately $5.00 per gallon in US currency.Any recommendations would be welcomed.
  • Eric Wait! They're moving? Mexico??!!
  • GrumpyOldMan All modern road vehicles have tachometers in RPM X 1000. I've often wondered if that is a nanny-state regulation to prevent drivers from confusing it with the speedometer. If so, the Ford retro gauges would appear to be illegal.
Next