Trade War Watch: Trump Rejects Auto Tariff Deal With Europe

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Earlier this year, President Donald Trump took a renewed interest in European tariffs after deciding he didn’t like what he saw. He argued it was time for the United States to consider a fresh tax on vehicles manufactured in the European Union to level the playing field. “If the EU wants to further increase their already massive tariffs and barriers on U.S. companies doing business there, we will simply apply a tax on their cars which freely pour into the U.S.,” he wrote in March.

A few months later, America floated the ridiculous-sounding proposal of abolishing all automotive tariffs between the U.S. and EU. Surprisingly, Europe was highly receptive. German Chancellor Angela Merkel even directly addressed the issue by saying she would support lowering EU tariffs on U.S. car imports. The European Union now seems willing to pursue a zero-tariff solution on automobiles.

However, Trump has since changed his tune. The new rhetoric coming from the White House is that the deal, which was originally pitched by the U.S., is no longer good enough.

This came just a few hours after EU Trade Commissioner Cecilia Malmstrom told the European Parliament’s trade committee that the EU is absolutely “willing to bring down even our car tariffs to zero, all tariffs to zero, if the U.S. does the same.”

While that sounds like exactly the sort of deal the United States wanted, Trump pulled back. “It’s not good enough,” he told Bloomberg in an interview from Thursday. “Their consumer habits are to buy their cars, not to buy our cars. The European Union is almost as bad as China, just smaller.”

That is true. The majority of American automobiles that sell well in Europe are manufactured outside the U.S. However, there’s a swath of German brands that build here and sell globally that would be seriously affected by tariffs — namely BMW and Mercedes-Benz.

From Bloomberg:

BMW for example is projected to sell nearly 70,000 X3 SUVs in Europe made in its South Carolina factory this year, according to data from LMC Automotive. Compare that to roughly 15,000 units of Tesla Inc.’s Model S sedan, which LMC, an industry data consultancy, projects will be the top-selling model in Europe assembled in the U.S. by an American automaker.

Presently, the U.S. imposes a 25 percent tariff on light trucks and pickups and a 2.5 percent levy on passenger cars. The EU imposes a 10 percent tariff on all passenger vehicles. The United States has suggested increasing the fee on imported automobiles if a deal cannot be struck that would boost domestic production and get more American Made machinery into European driveways.

Figuring out exactly what the U.S. wants out of this arrangement is difficult to pick apart. It’s not as if the EU can force its population to buy American, and nullifying tariffs was something the United States seemed genuinely interested in. It also seemed incredible that the EU was willing to play ball. Trump clearly desires more from Europe, though.

We’re curious to see how this plays out, as there appeared to be plenty of buzz around the deal. The zero-trade proposal also gave European auto stocks a boost, so it’ll be doubly interesting to see how they’re impacted by the apparent dissolution of the plan.

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 158 comments
  • Tstag Tstag on Sep 01, 2018

    As a European I think we should lower our trade barriers to zero on US cars. But if Trump subsequently attacks European cars with tarrifs then we should all out retaliate. The EU is actually a bigger market than the US if Trump insitis on a fight then he’s in for a shock!

  • Jeff S Jeff S on Sep 03, 2018

    Seems like many of the compact and subcompact cars could qualify for the EU those with less than 2.0 ccs especially the turbo charged 4 cylinders. As for US brands that would for the most part leave GM which doesn't have a presence in the EU since selling off Opel. Ford already has the Focus and Fiesta in the EU. On second thought maybe not. Agree the EU standards make importing most vehicles impossible. Maybe Tesla and other electric vehicles. Do we really need the European market for US made vehicles except maybe BMW, Mercedes, VW, the Japanese, and the Korean brands made in the US? Seems China and Asia are the markets to concentrate on. European standards will become harder to comply with except electric because they will eventually eliminate ICE. Sounds like the EU might not be worth going after with their increasing complex and more restrictive regulations. There are other US made products that would do much better in the EU. Also most of the EU cars that aren't in the US market might not be worth bringing over. I doubt they are as good as the Japanese and South Korean brands unless you like lots of repairs and higher cost parts.

  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh I'd rather they have the old sweep gauges, the hhuuggee left to right speedometer from the 40's and 50's where the needle went from lefty to right like in my 1969 Nova
  • Buickman I like it!
  • JMII Hyundai Santa Cruz, which doesn't do "truck" things as well as the Maverick does.How so? I see this repeated often with no reference to exactly what it does better.As a Santa Cruz owner the only things the Mav does better is price on lower trims and fuel economy with the hybrid. The Mav's bed is a bit bigger but only when the SC has the roll-top bed cover, without this they are the same size. The Mav has an off road package and a towing package the SC lacks but these are just some parts differences. And even with the tow package the Hyundai is rated to tow 1,000lbs more then the Ford. The SC now has XRT trim that beefs up the looks if your into the off-roader vibe. As both vehicles are soft-roaders neither are rock crawling just because of some extra bits Ford tacked on.I'm still loving my SC (at 9k in mileage). I don't see any advantages to the Ford when you are looking at the medium to top end trims of both vehicles. If you want to save money and gas then the Ford becomes the right choice. You will get a cheaper interior but many are fine with this, especially if don't like the all touch controls on the SC. However this has been changed in the '25 models in which buttons and knobs have returned.
  • Analoggrotto I'd feel proper silly staring at an LCD pretending to be real gauges.
  • Gray gm should hang their wimpy logo on a strip mall next to Saul Goodman's office.
Next