Slow Out of the Gate, Ford Says It Won't Skimp on GT Production

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

For those wealthy enough to afford a Ford GT — and lucky enough to be chosen by Ford for the current model run — relax, things could be worse. But there’s no denying that waiting on a car, especially one as scarce and desirable as the GT, is a painful experience. It’s one made all the more painful by the fact that GT production didn’t exactly lift gracefully from the launch pad.

Of the 250 GTs Ford planned to build for the 2017 model year, only 138 carbon-fiber beasts left partner Multimatic’s Canadian facility.

According to Motor Authority, which came across this tidbit on a Ford GT online message board, a number of issues cropped up early in the second-generation GT’s lifespan. Multimatic planned to build one of the EcoBoost-powered supercars a day, but the ramp-up instead took months. Ford’s partner only reached its goal in mid-2017 — more than half a year after the first GT left the facility.

“This is a hand-built supercar, which we are committed to deliver flawlessly. We built into our process an extended ramp-up due to several factors such as global homologation testing and supplier constraints,” a Ford spokesman said in a statement.

Multimatic hasn’t experienced this pace of production before, and a follow-up inquiry revealed that supplier issues and the extra time needed to paint “Victory” edition GTs added to the shortfall. Ford promises a full complement of 250 vehicles for the 2018 model year.

After announcing the initial two-year run, consumer demand for the GT overwhelmed Ford. The automaker soon found itself announcing an additional two years of GT production, wrapping up for the 2020 model year. However, the 138 vehicles built for 2017 means Ford has to play catch-up.

“We are building one Ford GT a day and are committed to building the vehicle for at least four years,” Ford’s spokesman said, adding, “We’re sticking to our initial commitment of 1,000 vehicles.”

[Image: Ford Motor Company]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 6 comments
  • SCE to AUX All that lift makes for an easy rollover of your $70k truck.
  • SCE to AUX My son cross-shopped the RAV4 and Model Y, then bought the Y. To their surprise, they hated the RAV4.
  • SCE to AUX I'm already driving the cheap EV (19 Ioniq EV).$30k MSRP in late 2018, $23k after subsidy at lease (no tax hassle)$549/year insurance$40 in electricity to drive 1000 miles/month66k miles, no range lossAffordable 16" tiresVirtually no maintenance expensesHyundai (for example) has dramatically cut prices on their EVs, so you can get a 361-mile Ioniq 6 in the high 30s right now.But ask me if I'd go to the Subaru brand if one was affordable, and the answer is no.
  • David Murilee Martin, These Toyota Vans were absolute garbage. As the labor even basic service cost 400% as much as servicing a VW Vanagon or American minivan. A skilled Toyota tech would take about 2.5 hours just to change the air cleaner. Also they also broke often, as they overheated and warped the engine and boiled the automatic transmission...
  • Marcr My wife and I mostly work from home (or use public transit), the kid is grown, and we no longer do road trips of more than 150 miles or so. Our one car mostly gets used for local errands and the occasional airport pickup. The first non-Tesla, non-Mini, non-Fiat, non-Kia/Hyundai, non-GM (I do have my biases) small fun-to-drive hatchback EV with 200+ mile range, instrument display behind the wheel where it belongs and actual knobs for oft-used functions for under $35K will get our money. What we really want is a proper 21st century equivalent of the original Honda Civic. The Volvo EX30 is close and may end up being the compromise choice.
Next