Endless Pressure and Public Scandal Leads to Pruitt's Resignation as EPA Head

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Scott Pruitt, who spearheaded the Trump administration’s initiative to roll back Obama-era fuel economy standards for light vehicles, has resigned. Even after assuming the position, Pruitt remained a tough sell as head of the EPA. His stance on climate change was uncharacteristic of any modern-day environmentalist and he seemed utterly bent on corporate deregulation to bolster profits and stimulate the economy.

Then came a flurry of scandals stemming from frivolous spending habits, improper use of authority, and possible business ties that would inhibit his ability to act in an unbiased manner. Numerous federal investigations were launched into these matters.

While a number of the impropriety claims came from political opponents actively hunting for gaps in his armor, let’s face it, Pruitt hasn’t been making things particularly difficult for them.

His rental of a bedroom in a condominium located in an expensive area of Washington D.C. — owned by the wife of lobbyist — for $50 a night for several months was as strange as it was suspicious. But it was his alleged office habits that were the most damning. Pruitt reportedly had staff running personal errands for him, doing things like investigating real estate opportunities or helping him pursue a Chick-fil-A franchise. He also spent quite a bit of money on a private phone booth at the EPA and racked up huge bills by flying in first- and business-class seats as frequently as possible — even for extremely short trips.

EPA officials said the decision to fly first class was necessary because Pruitt had become recognizable due to widespread media coverage and was being subjected to vulgar language and aggressive behavior from the public. The agency head had even received death threats at his home. His security team claimed isolating him was best solution to the problem.

“If he’s surrounded by other members of the public or it’s a threat, their job is to push him and pull him away from those threats,” Henry Barnet , the director of EPA’s Office of Criminal Enforcement, said in a February interview with Bloomberg. “That’s why it is imperative to keep him away from the individuals so they can keep him safe.”

General support of Pruitt was already waning in the lead-up to various House subcommittees on Capitol Hill earlier this year — where he was accused of being irresponsible with money and no protector of the environment. While some of the charges against him were indefensible, he did have a rebuttal for the fuel economy rollback. It’s been his assertion that the burden to maintain the existing efficiency mandates on automobiles weighs heavy on the industry and is largely unrealistic.

Automakers may be able to squeak by, enduring moderate financial penalties in the coming years, but he feels that consumers won’t respond to more fuel efficient vehicles. This is debatable, especially if the industry has to offer them, but there’s evidence to support his claim. The practical efficiency of new vehicles hasn’t gone up in several years when you account for American buying habits. People are selecting heavier automobiles and not placing a strong emphasis on efficiency.

Be that as it may, Pruitt’s deregulation crusade still caused quite a bit of negative publicity. Some of his decisions have no rebuttal that doesn’t revolve around claims that the EPA has gotten overzealous in recent years — something which began when he was Oklahoma’s attorney general. But a lot of Pruitt’s decisions just look like he’s doing businesses that want to pollute a series of large favors.

Several aides and communications officers quit the EPA this year while the Democrats clamored for his resignation. Even some Republican lawmakers have stopped defending him from criticism. Meanwhile, the EPA’s own Science Advisory Board said the agency was ignoring its own research to rationalize its push to deregulate.

President Donald Trump announced in a tweet on Thursday that he had officially accepted Pruitt’s resignation. “Within the Agency Scott has done an outstanding job and I will always be thankful to him for this,” Trump said.

Andrew Wheeler, a former lobbyist for the coal industry, will take over the agency as acting administrator on Monday. While his agenda is likely to be similar to that of Pruitt, most expect him to take a more moderate stance and not push quite so hard for widespread deregulation.

[Image: Lorie Shaull/ Wikimedia Commons ( CC BY-SA 2.0)]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 208 comments
  • CecilSaxon CecilSaxon on Jul 08, 2018

    TTAC needs to stick to cars. Folks either see him as the Devil incarnate and hater of all things dear to them or a benign God fearing man that just gave his all until politics began threatening his family.

  • El scotto El scotto on Jul 08, 2018

    1. There's a warning label every time you log into a government computer that more or less states that your consent to gov't monitoring. 1a. The far right/left will either love or hate that info. 2. Everything, repeat EVERYTHING Pruitt typed on his gov't computer was monitored. 2. Will the EPA Inspector General (IG) do anything with this info? 2a. Will the EPA IG do anything with this info? That's the next news story. Don't worry, TTAC will run it.

  • Honda1 Unions were needed back in the early days, not needed know. There are plenty of rules and regulations and government agencies that keep companies in line. It's just a money grad and nothing more. Fain is a punk!
  • 1995 SC If the necessary number of employees vote to unionize then yes, they should be unionized. That's how it works.
  • Sobhuza Trooper That Dave Thomas fella sounds like the kind of twit who is oh-so-quick to tell us how easy and fun the bus is for any and all of your personal transportation needs. The time to get to and from the bus stop is never a concern. The time waiting for the bus is never a concern. The time waiting for a connection (if there is one) is never a concern. The weather is never a concern. Whatever you might be carrying or intend to purchase is never a concern. Nope, Boo Cars! Yeah Buses! Buses rule!Needless to say, these twits don't actual take the damn bus.
  • MaintenanceCosts Nobody here seems to acknowledge that there are multiple use cases for cars.Some people spend all their time driving all over the country and need every mile and minute of time savings. ICE cars are better for them right now.Some people only drive locally and fly when they travel. For them, there's probably a range number that works, and they don't really need more. For the uses for which we use our EV, that would be around 150 miles. The other thing about a low range requirement is it can make 120V charging viable. If you don't drive more than an average of about 40 miles/day, you can probably get enough electrons through a wall outlet. We spent over two years charging our Bolt only through 120V, while our house was getting rebuilt, and never had an issue.Those are extremes. There are all sorts of use cases in between, which probably represent the majority of drivers. For some users, what's needed is more range. But I think for most users, what's needed is better charging. Retrofit apartment garages like Tim's with 240V outlets at every spot. Install more L3 chargers in supermarket parking lots and alongside gas stations. Make chargers that work like Tesla Superchargers as ubiquitous as gas stations, and EV charging will not be an issue for most users.
  • MaintenanceCosts I don't have an opinion on whether any one plant unionizing is the right answer, but the employees sure need to have the right to organize. Unions or the credible threat of unionization are the only thing, history has proven, that can keep employers honest. Without it, we've seen over and over, the employers have complete power over the workers and feel free to exploit the workers however they see fit. (And don't tell me "oh, the workers can just leave" - in an oligopolistic industry, working conditions quickly converge, and there's not another employer right around the corner.)
Next