General Motors Going Back Into the Defense Business

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

“Old soldiers never die,” the saying goes, “they just fade away.”

And that’s exactly what General Motors, no stranger to U.S. military products, did following the Cold War. The company that once produced the Cadillac-built M5 Stuart tank and Buick-built M18 Hellcat tank destroyer in World War Two sold its military products division — GM Defense — to General Dynamics in 2003.

However, just because Stryker and LAV III light armored vehicle production is now someone else’s responsibility doesn’t mean GM isn’t interested in fulfilling the military’s needs. The company still ships engines and transmissions to the Army, but according to a new report, the automaker is once again planning an official military division.

Coming on the heels of last week’s unveiling of the versatile Silent Utility Rover Universal Superstructure (SURUS), Automotive News reports that GM has a new defense industry unit in the works.

Called GM Defense LLC, the unit would exist under the automaker’s Global Product Development umbrella. Last week’s fuel cell-powered vehicle platform would be just one product the unit aims to dangle in front of customers. Besides the obvious U.S. Army appeal of its vehicles, other products would fill various roles in both aerospace and defence, GM claims.

“This new business structure will enhance GM’s productivity, agility and affordability in a very dynamic customer environment,” said Charlie Freese, executive director of GM Global Fuel Cell Business, in an email to Automotive News. “Our goal is to make it simpler and more seamless to do business with General Motors.”

It will be Freese’s job to oversee GM Defense LLC. As for the unit’s home base, the company hasn’t decided on a location yet, according to GM spokeswoman Elizabeth Winter.

The HD truck-based SURUS platform isn’t the only hydrogen-powered project under development at GM. A year ago, GM unveiled a war-ready fuel cell variant of the Chevrolet Colorado pickup, and a third project is said to be underway.

[Image: General Motors]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 5 comments
  • JMII Hyundai Santa Cruz, which doesn't do "truck" things as well as the Maverick does.How so? I see this repeated often with no reference to exactly what it does better.As a Santa Cruz owner the only things the Mav does better is price on lower trims and fuel economy with the hybrid. The Mav's bed is a bit bigger but only when the SC has the roll-top bed cover, without this they are the same size. The Mav has an off road package and a towing package the SC lacks but these are just some parts differences. And even with the tow package the Hyundai is rated to tow 1,000lbs more then the Ford. The SC now has XRT trim that beefs up the looks if your into the off-roader vibe. As both vehicles are soft-roaders neither are rock crawling just because of some extra bits Ford tacked on.I'm still loving my SC (at 9k in mileage). I don't see any advantages to the Ford when you are looking at the medium to top end trims of both vehicles. If you want to save money and gas then the Ford becomes the right choice. You will get a cheaper interior but many are fine with this, especially if don't like the all touch controls on the SC. However this has been changed in the '25 models in which buttons and knobs have returned.
  • Analoggrotto I'd feel proper silly staring at an LCD pretending to be real gauges.
  • Gray gm should hang their wimpy logo on a strip mall next to Saul Goodman's office.
  • 1995 SC No
  • Analoggrotto I hope the walls of Mary Barra's office are covered in crushed velvet.
Next