Stellantis CEO Says EV Transition Poses Serious Problems

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky
stellantis ceo says ev transition poses serious problems

The automotive sector is currently suffering from ongoing component shortages and supply chain bottlenecks stemming from regional restrictions relating to the pandemic. However, it’s assumed that those problems will gradually abate, only to be supplanted by a global deficit of the raw materials necessary for battery production. Analysts have been warning about the shift toward electric vehicles, spurred on by government regulations, for years. But they’re starting to get some company from within the auto industry.

On Tuesday, Stellantis CEO Carlos Tavares suggested that there was a very real possibility that manufacturers could begin confronting serious issues in terms of battery production by 2025 if the shift toward EVs continues at pace. Though his concerns aren’t limited to there being a new chapter in the already too long saga about parts shortages. Tavares is also worried that Western automakers will become overwhelmingly dependent upon Asian battery suppliers which already dominate the global market.

“And if there is no short supply of batteries then there will be a significant dependence of the Western world vis-à-vis Asia. That is something we can easily anticipate,” the CEO said during the Financial Times Future of the Car 2022 conference.

Based on the mad rush to invest in the procurement of the necessary raw materials over the last few years, the rest of the industry couldn’t possibly be unaware of this potential scenario. But some may be better positioned since Fiat Chrysler Automobiles repeatedly snubbed electrification while corporate leadership focused on securing a merger. Now that FCA has combined with PSA Group to become Stellantis, the entity is realigned its priorities to include more of what everyone else is doing.

The company has said it intends on selling sell 5 million all-electric vehicles by 2030 to cater to gasoline bans that are planned for Europe. This comes in tandem with its announcement of battery plants in France, Germany, and Italy to support EV production in the EU. While the industry believes North America will take longer to electrify, Stellantis is planning a battery facility in Ontario, confirmed that Dodge is presently working on electrified muscle cars, and promised that there is at least some level of EV-ification taking place within every other brand it currently owns. Despite this, Tavares seems to believe that government regulators may be steering the industry toward disaster.

“The speed at which now everybody is building manufacturing capacity for batteries is possibly on the edge to be able to support the fast-changing markets in which we are operating,” he said, adding that the emphasis on a swift transition toward EVs could have loads of unforeseen consequences by 2025.

In addition to making Western markets increasingly beholden to Asian manufacturing, Tavares also questioned the ecological benefits of rushing headlong into battery-driven vehicles. Mining operations are not the same in all countries and often come bundled with the risk of using child labor, slave labor, and/or less-than-stringent environmental considerations. Sadly, the bar for what’s deemed acceptable will only be lowered as demand for electrified products increases.

“That means a lot of raw material extraction, that means eventually scarcity of raw materials, that means eventually geopolitical risks,” the CEO said. “We may not like the way those raw materials are going to be sourced in a few years.”

These are issues your author has been similarly vexed about since 2015. But Tavares eventually strayed from the usual talking points of electrification skeptics to examine how this might negatively impact the industry’s finances. By focusing so heavily on advancing new technologies in an effort to surge battery-electric vehicles on the global market, Stellantis’ leadership is worried the industry is putting itself out on a limb that could snap.

Tavares painted a picture where supply chains haven’t fully recovered and the automotive sector now has to cope with limited battery production in Asia. While 2025 was originally supposed to be the year EVs reached financial parity with combustion cars, the suggested scenario would guarantee the former remained substantially more expensive. But vehicle prices would remain high across the board, making it difficult for any company to operate normally in the years to come — regardless of whether they were selling electric or gas-powered products.

Stellantis’ top dog likewise voiced concerns about what would happen to the countless engineers specializing in internal combustion engines if every automaker swaps exclusively to electric cars. Your author would argue this problem extends to independent repair shops and parts retailers, though Tavares focused mainly on those working directly for automakers during his speech.

“We see that some companies would like to go on Old Co., New Co. kind of break down. Our position is quite different from that,” he explained. “For the people who have been creating wealth and value over the last fifty years, for the communities in which we operate, for our own company, it is not ethical to wake up in the morning and discover that you are on the wrong side of the line.”

“It’s important to tell them that we want to bring them along with us because we believe in their learning capabilities,” the CEO continued. “The most important thing is to tell them that we love them. We want to bring them along with us.”

That little bit of backpedaling was fairly common among the conference’s speakers. Numerous CEOs, including Volkswagen AG’s Herbert Diess, made statements about how the existing regulatory targets were untenable — only to double down on their companies’ growing commitment toward battery electric vehicles still being the correct choice. At this point, they almost have to. Collectively, the automotive sector spent an estimated $230 billion on capital expenditures, research, and development pertaining to EVs in 2020. Another $550 billion has been plotted between now and 2030. Automakers have also been planning to introduce new revenue streams that rely heavily on electrification and vehicle connectivity. The ramifications of failing with EVs now would be nothing short of catastrophic — and may explain why top-ranking executives have started hinting that it might be wise to slow things down before it’s too late.

Despite gaining an early lead on electrification due to Dieselgate, Volkswagen Group had trouble building truly competitive EVs until somewhat recently. Major shifts in production also resulted in work stoppages stemming from widespread component shortages (which curiously didn’t seem to impact Tesla all that seriously) and problems with quality control. But that’s not what the business feels is its greatest obstacle. Diess stressed that the number of charging stations planned for Europe probably wouldn’t be sufficient to support 100-percent EV sales by 2030. Tavares seemed to be in agreement, noting that it was just one problem of many attached to the overarching electrification scheme.

“What’s next? Where is the clean energy? Where is the charging infrastructure? Where are the raw materials? Where are the geopolitical risks of sourcing those raw materials? Who is looking at the full picture of this transformation?” he asked the audience.

[Image: Frederic Legrand – COMEO/Shutterstock]

Join the conversation
3 of 62 comments
  • Hreardon Hreardon on May 12, 2022

    I have a strong suspicion that those states looking to ban ICE vehicles are going to be making changes to those plans as the cutoff dates get closer and consumers start paying attention to what's *really* going to happen. The problem is that these lawmakers are treating ICE like incandescent lights. The ramifications of this ban are significantly greater than they fully understand.

  • Theo Theo on Aug 30, 2022

    It just trading one environmental issue for another,mining lithium has implications. But most of the EV drivers in the USA will just say "they are saving the planet" while shifting the environmental cost to that allows them to say that to a third world country.

    South America's 'lithium fields' reveal the dark side of our electric future

    • Mcs Mcs on Aug 30, 2022

      Yeah, but once the lithium is mined, it can be recycled from batteries by companies like redwood materials. It's not like the constant damage by the oil industry. You also have CATL and other companies making rapid progress with NA+ sodium ion battery with mass production starting next year. Besides, there's only about 18 lbs of lithium in the battery. Compared with the ton+ of steel in a car (that has to be processed and sometimes mined), it's really trivial. There are also clean geothermal lithium mining operations coming online like in the Salton Sea area.

  • Jeanbaptiste Any variant of “pizza” flavored combos. I only eat these on car trips and they are just my special gut wrenching treat.
  • Nrd515 Usually for me it's been Arby's for pretty much forever, except when the one near my house dosed me with food poisoning twice in about a year. Both times were horrible, but the second time was just so terrible it's up near the top of my medical horror stories, and I have a few of those. Obviously, I never went to that one again. I'm still pissed at Arby's for dropping Potato Cakes, and Culver's is truly better anyway. It will be Arby's fish for my "cheat day", when I eat what I want. No tartar sauce and no lettuce on mine, please. And if I get a fish and a French Dip & Swiss? Keep the Swiss, and the dip, too salty. Just the meat and the bread for me, thanks. The odds are about 25% that they will screw one or both of them up and I will have to drive through again to get replacement sandwiches. Culver's seems to get my order right many times in a row, but if I hurry and don't check my order, that's when it's screwed up and garbage to me. My best friend lives on Starbucks coffee. I don't understand coffee's appeal at all. Both my sister and I hate anything it's in. It's like green peppers, they ruin everything they touch. About the only things I hate more than coffee are most condiments, ranked from most hated to..who cares..[list=1][*]Tartar sauce. Just thinking about it makes me smell it in my head. A nod to Ranch here too. Disgusting. [/*][*]Mayo. JEEEEZUS! WTF?[/*][*]Ketchup. Sweet puke tasting sludge. On my fries? Salt. [/*][*]Mustard. Yikes. Brown, yellow, whatever, it's just awful.[/*][*]Pickles. Just ruin it from the pickle juice. No. [/*][*]Horsey, Secret, whatever sauce. Gross. [/*][*]American Cheese. American Sleeze. Any cheese, I don't want it.[/*][*]Shredded lettuce. I don't hate it, but it's warm and what's the point?[/*][*]Raw onion. Totally OK, but not something I really want. Grilled onions is a whole nother thing, I WANT those on a burger.[/*][*]Any of that "juice" that Subway and other sandwich places want to put on. NO, HELL NO! Actually, move this up to #5. [/*][/list=1]
  • SPPPP It seems like a really nice car that's just still trying to find its customer.
  • MRF 95 T-Bird I owned an 87 Thunderbird aka the second generation aero bird. It was a fine driving comfortable and very reliable car. Quite underrated compared to the GM G-body mid sized coupes since unlike them they had rack and pinion steering and struts on all four wheels plus fuel injection which GM was a bit late to the game on their mid and full sized cars. When I sold it I considered a Mark VII LSC which like many had its trouble prone air suspension deleted and replaced with coils and struts. Instead I went for a MN-12 Thunderbird.
  • SCE to AUX Somebody got the bill of material mixed up and never caught it.Maybe the stud was for a different version (like the 4xe) which might use a different fuel tank.