Nikola Founder Continues Dumping Stock Following Criminal Indictment

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Nikola Corp. founder, Trevor Milton, has been offloading stock ever since he was indicted for making misleading and/or blatantly false statements about the company. The formal charges were issued in July, piggybacking off a critically damning report from 2020 that alleged Nikola had grotesquely misrepresented its production capabilities and falsified a video where it showed an inoperable prototype vehicle working as if it was fully functional. The paper caught the attention of both the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) as well as the Department of Justice (DOJ) — resulting in Milton stepping down as CEO and twelve months of investigative probes.

According to Bloomberg, the founder dumped 11.7 million shares of Nikola in a series of transactions that wrapped up on Tuesday. That was estimated to be worth about $131 million and stacks with $153 million of stock Milton sold in August of 2021.

From Bloomberg:

Federal prosecutors took issue with his claims about the startup’s first semi-truck prototype, which was inoperable; a battery-electric and hydrogen-powered pickup that amounted to little more than design sketches; and Nikola’s hydrogen production capabilities, battery-development work and customer orders.

Nikola announced earlier this month it was in talks with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission to resolve its investigation and expects to pay a $125 million civil penalty. The company ended September with about $587 million in cash.

While the vehicle startup saw its valuation plummet immediately after last year’s scandal, its share price has been comparatively stable in recent months. But it’s still trending down and Milton may need a bunch of money to help cover some sizable legal bills.

But this is also what rich people do, especially when they happen to be in charge of an EV startup. Milton, and those like him, are too often the modern equivalent of a snake-oil salesman. Some businesses barter untested mobility solutions, typically targeting small cities desperate to revitalize their image. Others simply go big and sell the dream of emissions-free transportation without a hint of how it’s to be accomplished. Though the result is always the same, a public that buys in and executives that cash outright when the company begins to tank. The resulting funds are then put into assets yielding legitimate value (e.g. fancy homes) and sometimes recirculated into the next business venture.

This is hardly limited to the automotive realm, of course. Fraudulent businesses and misleading marketing predate recorded history. But there’s clearly a surplus in several modern sectors of commerce, with EV startups occupying a spot somewhere near the top.

While we cannot say that Milton had premeditated plans to con Nikola investors, there’s a case being made to prove that’s exactly what happened. Though it pretty much always feels like these kinds of financial shenanigans fall short of anything that can be considered true accountability. My guess is that the decades-old sexual impropriates that always seem to come after larger, more-actionable scandals, will continue to follow Milton around in the media. Trevor supposedly abused his underage cousin at a funeral when he was 18. But those allegations will quickly dissipate once the public has lost interest or he’s issued a slap on the wrist for the as-of-yet-unproven industrial misdeeds.

Then, assuming that we’re sticking to the modern manner of “doing business,” he’ll reemerge a few years later to announce some miraculous product that he’ll be able to mass-produce after investors have poured a few billion into his new company. Meanwhile, Nikola will throw a few employees under the bus and be faulted for having a “toxic corporate culture” that can only be ended by adding more female executives. Your guess is as good as mine on whether or not the company will ever mass-produce electric and hydrogen-powered vehicles, however.

[Image: Nikola]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 10 comments
  • MaintenanceCosts In Toyota's hands, these hybrid powertrains with a single motor and a conventional automatic transmission have not been achieving the same kind of fuel economy benefits as the planetary-gear setups in the smaller cars. It's too bad. Many years ago GM did a group of full-size pickups and SUVs with a 6.0L V8 and a two-motor planetary gear system, and those got the fuel economy boost you'd expect while maintaining big-time towing capacity. Toyota should have done the same with its turbo four and six in the new trucks.
  • JMII My C7 isn't too bad maintain wise but it requires 10 quarts of expensive 0W-40 once a year (per GM) and tires are pricey due size and grip requirements. I average about $600 a year in maintenance but a majority of that is due to track usage. Brake fluid, brake pads and tires add up quickly. Wiper blades, coolant flush, transmission fluid, rear diff fluid and a new battery were the other costs. I bought the car in 2018 with 18k in mileage and now it has 42k. Many of the items mentioned are needed between 20k and 40k per GM's service schedule so my ownership period just happens to align with various intervals.I really need to go thru my service spreadsheet and put track related items on a separate tab to get a better picture of what "normal" cost would be. Its likely 75% of my spend is track related.Repairs to date are only $350. I needed a new XM antenna (aftermarket), a cargo net clip, a backup lamp switch and new LED side markers (aftermarket). The LEDs were the most expensive at $220.
  • Slavuta I drove it but previous style. Its big, with numb steering feel, and transmission that takes away from whatever the engine has.
  • Wjtinfwb Rivaled only by the Prowler and Thunderbird as retro vehicles that missed the mark... by a mile.
  • Wjtinfwb Tennessee is a Right to Work state. The UAW will have a bit less leverage there than in Michigan, which repealed R t W a couple years ago. And how much leverage will the UAW really have in Chattanooga. That plant builds ID. 4 and Atlas, neither of which are setting the world afire, sales wise. I'd have thought VW would have learned the UAW plays by different rules than the placid German unions from the Westmoreland PA debacle. But history has shown VW to be exceptionally slow learners. Watching with interest.
Next