Ford Trots Out New Ranger for Other Markets, Will Likely Appear in America Soon
Despite what we’d all like to think, America isn’t always the first to receive a particular new vehicle – even when it is made by one of our largest automakers. That was the case with the current Ford Ranger, a pickup truck which was on sale in other markets before it showed up on our shores. Even now, other iterations (Ranger Raptor, anyone?) are not found in North American showrooms.
Such is the case for the next-gen Ranger as well, it seems. Ford launched the revamped mid-sizer in an online event last night, showing off a trio of trims and detailing several powertrains that are unlikely to be options in this country. One thing’s virtually assured, however – it probably won’t take Ford as long to drag this Ranger across the pond as it did with the current model.
Why? Profits, for one. We don’t need to explain to the B&B that pickup trucks are laden with profits in the same way your author’s plate of french fries is laden with gravy. Consider the burgeoning mid-size market as well, with players from Toyota and GM, not to mention the newly introduced Frontier. Leaving its Ranger to wither on the vine would be tantamount to leaving money on the table, something for which the Blue Oval is not known.
Anyways, the truck. This new Ranger cuts a familiar shape but has sufficiently different styling cues to distinguish it from the present model. It also rides on a wheelbase that is 2 inches longer and also has a couple extra inches of width. The latter will likely help with elbow room in the cab; at present, driver and passenger share cozy quarters. Those headlamps are very reminiscent of the Maverick, a choice that was surely intentional in order to create brand harmony across its lineup. That pickup family now runs the gamut from small to extra large, by the way, from unibody Maverick to giant Super Duty.
Behind that new face will reside a choice of powertrains, depending on the market in which the truck is being sold. Suffice it to say there is little chance either of the three diesel engines will make it to America, given recent challenges associated with that type of fuel. It is an excellent bet the existing 2.3-liter EcoBoost four-banger, making 270 horsepower and 310 lb-ft of torque, will return along with its 10-speed automatic transmission dance partner. Whispers remain that Ford is set to plug the 2.7L EcoBoost V6 into the next Ranger, set for Raptor duty and cranking out similar specs as found in F-150 – namely 325 horses and 400 lb-ft of twist. That is nothing but speculation for now, however.
We would say the interior shots provided by the Ford Thailand media site to show a cabin that is an evolution of the current accommodations. Dominating the dashboard is a large infotainment screen of similar ilk to the one found in Expedition and Mach-E, though it lacks the integrated dial of those units. Controls appear on the display for features such as heated seats but there doesn’t seem to be any fixed buttons for items like a power tailgate.
Speaking of the cargo area, Ford showed this next-gen Ranger with a very handy step integrated into the side of its bed just behind the rear wheel. Like GM’s bumper step, it’s a great way to offer owners a leg up while deploying exactly zero moving parts. Also shown in the promotional photos are twin power outlets in the bed, plus a rail system of sorts which seems to accept both moveable tie-down points and an oddball bed divider.
For some overseas markets, the next Ranger will be produced in Thailand and South Africa starting in 2022. We’ll keep our ears to the ground for the inevitable American version.
Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.
More by Matthew Guy
Latest Car ReviewsRead more
Latest Product ReviewsRead more
- 285exp If the conversion to EVs was really so vital to solve an existential climate change crisis, it wouldn’t matter whether they were built by US union workers or where the batteries and battery materials came from.
- El scotto Another EBPosky, "EVs are Stoopid, prove to me water freezes at 0 degrees Celsius" article.It was never explained if the rural schools own the buses or if the school bus routes are contracted out. If the bus routes are contracted out, will Carpenter or Bluebird offer an electric school bus? Flexmatt never stated the range of brand-unspecified school bus. Will the min-mart be open at the end of the 179-mile drive? No cell coverage? Why doesn't the bus driver have an emergency sat phone?Two more problems Mr. Musk could solve.
- RICK Long time Cadillac admirer with 89 Fleetwood Brougham deElegance and 93 Brougham, always liked Eldorado until downsized after 76. Those were the days. Sad to see what now wears Cadillac name.
- Carsofchaos Bike lanes are in use what maybe 10 to 12 hours a day? The other periods of the day they aren't in use whatsoever. A bike can carry one person and a vehicle can carry multiple people. It's very simple math to figure out that a bike lane in no way shape or form will handle more people than cars will.The bigger issue is double parked delivery vehicles. They are often double parked and taking up lanes because there are cars parked on the curb. You combine that with a bike lane and pedestrians Crossing wherever they feel like it and it's a recipe for disaster. I think if we could just go back to two lanes of traffic things would flow much better. I started coming to the city in 2003 before a lot of these bike lanes were implemented and the traffic is definitely much worse now than it was back then. Sadly at this point I don't really think there is a solution but I can guarantee that congestion pricing will not fix this problem.
- Charles When I lived in Los Angeles I saw a 9-5 a few times and instanly admired the sweeping low slug aerodynamic jet tech influenced lines and all that beautiful glass. The car was very different from what I expected from a Saab even though the 900 Turbo was nice. A casual lady friend had a Saab Sonnet, never drove or rode in it but nonetheless chilled my enthusiasm and I eventually forgot about Saabs. In the following years I have had seven Mercedes's, three or four Jaguars even two Daimlers both the 250 V-8 and the massive and powerful Majestic Major. Daily drivers of a brand new 300ZX 2+2 and Lincolns, plus a few diesel trucks. Having moved to my big farm in central New York, trucks and SUV's are the standard, even though I have a Mercedes S500 in one of my barns. Due to circumstances with my Ford Explorer and needing a second driver I found the 2006 9-5 locally. Very little surface rust, none undercarriage, original owner, garage kept, wife driver and all the original literature and a ton of paid receipts and history. The car just turned 200,000 miles and I love it. Feels new like I'm back in my Nissan 300ZX with a lot more European class and ready power with the awesome turbo. So fun to drive, the smooth power and torque is incredible! Great price paid to justify going through the car and giving her everything she needs, i.e., new tires, battery, all shocks, struts, control arms, timing chain and rust removable to come, plus more. The problem now is I want to restore it and likely put it in my concrete barn and only drive in good weather. As to the writer, Alex Dykes, I take great exception calling the 9-5 Saab "ugly," finding myself looking back at her beauty and uniqueness. Moreover, I get new looks from others not quite recognizing, like the days out west with my more expensive European cars. There are Saabs eclipsing 300K rourinely and one at a million miles and I believe one car with 500K on the original engine. So clearly, this is a keeper, in love already with my SportCombi. I want to be in that elite club.