Mexico Gives Amnesty to Illegal American Cars

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Last week, Mexican President Andrés Manuel López Obrador made a pledge to legalize millions of vehicles being illegally imported from the United States. While it sounds like a phenomenal way to help the nation to contend with product shortages that are driving up vehicle prices around the globe, all of the cars had been smuggled previously and many were presumed to have been stolen.

This has created a lot of tension. Despite there being evidence that these vehicles frequently end up becoming workhorses for criminal cartels, illegally imported beaters also provide a cheap alternative to poorer residents right when automotive prices (new and used) have started to disconnect from reality. Times are tough and destitute families aren’t going to care where a car comes from when it’s the only one they can afford. So López Obrador has officially launched a new regularization program designed to bring these automobiles into the fold.

“We are going to legalize all of them, we are going to give them a permit, we are going to recognize them as owners of the vehicle,” López Obrador said ahead of signing the amnesty agreement. “Because there are a lot of people who use these cars because they don’t have the money to buy a new car, and with these cars they take their children to school and carry out their activities.”

Importing cars into Mexico has always been legal, provided it meets the latest regulatory standards and individuals pay the necessary fees. But there are millions of automobiles currently operating within the country that were snuck in, most of which originated in the United States. Known as “chocolate cars,” they’ve been the preferred steed for organized crime. But they also make their way into the hands of regular people as an affordable alternative to secondhand goods found on dealer lots. Due to taxes and fees, smuggled vehicles can be found at roughly half the price as a government-certified secondhand jalopy.

The amnesty arrangement would allow these illegal imports to be registered in Mexico after paying a fee of 2,500 pesos ($123 USD). Though local authorities have to come up with their own unique strategies to encourage those in possession of chocolate cars to comply. For now, the plan is being limited to states that border the U.S. (Sonora, Chihuahua, Coahuila, Nuevo León, Tamaulipas, and Baja California) since they’re the ones presumed to contain the largest number of illegal imports. Baja alone is estimated to have 500,000 cars, despite having a population of less than 4 million.

President López Obrador stated that the plan could be used to help El Norte’s six municipalities fund roadway repairs with tens of billions of pesos flooding into states that saw health compliance numbers. But not everyone shares his enthusiasm. Guillermo Rosales Zárate, the Director of Mexico’s Association of Automotive Distributors, has claimed the strategy effectively rewards criminal behavior and could cut new vehicle sales by over 30 percent.

“It is a mistake to legalize smuggled vehicles,” he said. “It will have an impact on the economy, as well as create concerning environmental pollution and insecurity that threatens people’s lives.”

While the sales estimate sounds plausible, any claims that this will negatively impact the environment are absolutely ridiculous. It’s always obnoxious to see pollution tacked onto every argument. But it’s particularly nonsensical in a scenario where the end goal results in older autos staying around longer and there is a lessened need for new vehicle production. Distributors have been asking the government to stop people from smuggling vehicles into the country for years and are willing to make whatever claims are necessary to get the public on their side.

Guillermo Rosales Zárate later went on to call the measure a victory for organized crime.

However, he’s hardly alone in his outrage. Numerous officials have cited that automotive smuggling has become a major industry for cartels operating along the border. Some even operate legitimate businesses on both sides of the fence to help facilitate the process while also serving as fronts for human trafficking and drug running. Worse yet, these groups have become the de facto government in some areas and often bribe corrupted officials so they’ll turn a blind eye.

This really clouds the argument on what’s to be done. If cartels have amassed sufficient power along the border to avoid prosecution, then it becomes hard to argue for the continuation of policies that have resulted in black market automobiles and increased violent crime. You either have to enforce the law or attempt to normalize the grayer aspects of criminal organizations to a point that they’ll hopefully go legit. I cannot presume to know which strategy is best for Mexico but the hands-off approach certainly hasn’t been working — and I don’t just mean in Mexico.

One of the consequences of smuggling being so lucrative has resulted in elevated car crime and smaller inventories north of the border. American states closer to the Mexican line often see per-capita vehicle thefts at quadruple the frequency as those located along the Atlantic Ocean. While some of that has to do with their proximity to shipping containers waiting to shuttle stolen goods across the Pacific, vehicles being illegally imported into Mexico remain a significant factor. However, plenty of the vehicles being funneled southward are purchased legally from dealerships or through vehicle auctions (often as salvage titles).

Then there is the Mexican Employers Federation, which has suggested President López Obrador’s measures will ultimately load up Mexico with old, unsafe vehicles right when the automotive sector needs a boost. The nation’s new vehicle sales were down 20 percent over the first half of 2021 vs the same stretch of time in 2019.

Mexican media outlets have also been critical of the plan. But they don’t necessarily represent the people in possession of these cars, many of whom will probably be glad to ditch U.S. plates so they can formally register their vehicle. Still, much of the above holds little relevance when the Mexican government doesn’t seem to be in control of the border.

“We need to recognize that we don’t have control over the passage of these cars along the border,” Fidel Villanueva, the director of Anapromex, which defends the owners of illegally imported cars, told The Washington Post. “The Americans don’t want them, so they’ll keep coming, [good, nice and cheap.]”

Considering how much used vehicles are going for in the United States these days, it’s hard to claim we don’t want them. We just aren’t holding onto them and there’s not much being done about it.

[Image: Chess Ocampo/Shutterstock]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 29 comments
  • Jeff S Jeff S on Oct 22, 2021

    With the chip shortage the USA is starting to turn into Cuba.

  • Loopy55 Loopy55 on Oct 24, 2021

    Here in San Diego the US has its own “border” just before the entry into Mexico. This has license plate readers and is manned at random times..presumably to stop the trafficking of stolen vehicles.

  • Honda1 Unions were needed back in the early days, not needed know. There are plenty of rules and regulations and government agencies that keep companies in line. It's just a money grad and nothing more. Fain is a punk!
  • 1995 SC If the necessary number of employees vote to unionize then yes, they should be unionized. That's how it works.
  • Sobhuza Trooper That Dave Thomas fella sounds like the kind of twit who is oh-so-quick to tell us how easy and fun the bus is for any and all of your personal transportation needs. The time to get to and from the bus stop is never a concern. The time waiting for the bus is never a concern. The time waiting for a connection (if there is one) is never a concern. The weather is never a concern. Whatever you might be carrying or intend to purchase is never a concern. Nope, Boo Cars! Yeah Buses! Buses rule!Needless to say, these twits don't actual take the damn bus.
  • MaintenanceCosts Nobody here seems to acknowledge that there are multiple use cases for cars.Some people spend all their time driving all over the country and need every mile and minute of time savings. ICE cars are better for them right now.Some people only drive locally and fly when they travel. For them, there's probably a range number that works, and they don't really need more. For the uses for which we use our EV, that would be around 150 miles. The other thing about a low range requirement is it can make 120V charging viable. If you don't drive more than an average of about 40 miles/day, you can probably get enough electrons through a wall outlet. We spent over two years charging our Bolt only through 120V, while our house was getting rebuilt, and never had an issue.Those are extremes. There are all sorts of use cases in between, which probably represent the majority of drivers. For some users, what's needed is more range. But I think for most users, what's needed is better charging. Retrofit apartment garages like Tim's with 240V outlets at every spot. Install more L3 chargers in supermarket parking lots and alongside gas stations. Make chargers that work like Tesla Superchargers as ubiquitous as gas stations, and EV charging will not be an issue for most users.
  • MaintenanceCosts I don't have an opinion on whether any one plant unionizing is the right answer, but the employees sure need to have the right to organize. Unions or the credible threat of unionization are the only thing, history has proven, that can keep employers honest. Without it, we've seen over and over, the employers have complete power over the workers and feel free to exploit the workers however they see fit. (And don't tell me "oh, the workers can just leave" - in an oligopolistic industry, working conditions quickly converge, and there's not another employer right around the corner.)
Next