By on October 1, 2021

The troubled Lordstown Motors has announced it will be selling its Ohio production facility to the Taiwanese Hon Hai Precision Industry, better known as Foxconn. But this is not a case of the prospective automaker offloading its assets so it can pay off its debts in full retreat. Instead, Lordstown has asserted this is a necessary partnership that will help guarantee it can still deliver the all-electric Endurance pickup truck.

Terms stipulate that Lordstown Motors will sell the sprawling factory to Foxconn for about $230 million. Two years ago, the site was purchased from General Motors for a very breezy $20 million after the Detroit-based manufacturer decided to abandon the Chevrolet Cruze. Foxconn will also be buying up $50 million worth of common stock and effectively take responsibility for production at Lordstown Assembly. However there is a laundry list of things that need to be done before pickup assembly is even an option. 

The duo have yet to formalize their agreement as to how the Endurance will be assembled (with Foxconn presumed to take the lead) or collaborate with the relevant suppliers so that production can be maintained. They will also need to assemble the vehicles that will be used for the testing, validation, and verification, in order they can get the necessary regulatory approvals for moving forward.

Foxconn is assumed to be jumping in because it’s a multinational entity with trillions in revenue and ties dispersed across the technology sector and eager to expand into vehicle production. Some of its biggest clients have included Amazon, Apple, BlackBerry, Cisco, Dell, Fisker, Google, Hewlett-Packard, Huawei, Intel, Microsoft, Motorola, Nintendo, Sega, Sony, Toshiba, Vizio, and Xiaomi. Globally, Foxconn has more than a million employees and it remains the largest employer in mainland China by far.

Despite the prospective automaker having gotten itself into trouble of late (not that Foxconn is lacking in terms of scandal), news of the deal caused Lordstown shares to increase by as much as 12 percent on Thursday evening. Bloomberg reported that the stock climbed by 8.4 percent during regular hours, closing at $7.98.

From Bloomberg:

The accord gives both companies something they badly need. Lordstown Motors gets a partner that will hasten the startup’s move into large-scale production, which will help lower the high costs required to make EVs. Foxconn gets a plant in North America where it can build its open-source electric vehicle platform and do contract manufacturing for partners like Fisker Inc.

“It’s less about a facility sale than a strategic partnership,” Lordstown Motors Chief Executive Officer Dan Ninivaggi said in an interview. “You have to find a way to get scale in the auto industry. Foxconn has a vision. They’ve got enormous capabilities in manufacturing and they will be able to fill that plant faster than we could.”

Foxconn’s manufacturing prowess is irrefutable and it’s likely the firm was responsible for manufacturing at least one gaming console, computer, or cell phone you’ve previously owned. It also appears to be getting the better deal here since Lordstown had grown vocally desperate over the summer. Finances had reached a point where the company no longer knew if it would be able to reach the production phase and it is currently under investigation by the Securities and Exchange Commission and Department of Justice over its deal to go public — in addition to some allegedly false or misleading statements made by former management, including company founder and ex-CEO Steve Burns.

While the partnership does provide the cash-strapped EV startup with more funding, Foxconn now owns its only manufacturing facility and has the ability to jumpstart vehicle production ahead of plans to assist Fisker (likely using the same facility).

On a longer timeline, this could bode similarly well for Apple’s sporadic interest in building an automobile. But it’s a little early to presume anything right now. We’ll be impressed if Lordstown Motors manages to adhere to its promise of delivering its pickup within the first half of 2022.

[Image: Lordstown Motors]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

19 Comments on “Lordstown Motors Sells Home to Foxconn...”

  • avatar

    Since we are unable to make any cars, let’s flip plants for profit. Brilliant.

  • avatar

    RIDE at 6.66 right now, no joke (RIP $20-30 bag holders). Hopefully it will sink much further before Foxconn (or someone else) announces a buyout/merger.

  • avatar
    SCE to AUX

    Lordstown and Fisker in the same plant?

    I suppose it makes sense to consolidate the vapors.

  • avatar

    So now Lordstown has combined its untried “motor-in-hub” technology (it’s Slovenian!) with the high precision of Chinese manufacturing practices.

    What could possibly go wrong?

    • 0 avatar

      You can get high-precision manufacturing done in China.

      It’s just that Chinese CMs charge 1st-world prices for 1st-world quality, and many global brands pursue profit margins over quality.

      When you do business in China (and everywhere else on earth), you get to choose where on the quality-janky scale you want to be. The catch is that working janky-cheap partners tend to improve your profit margins.

    • 0 avatar

      One presumes that the always informed and up-to-date commentariat knows that Foxconn is a Taiwanese company? You know, capitalist to the core? Sure you do, you just forgot.

      Like US companies that offshored tens of millions of manufacturing jobs to China and hollowed out America just to make an extra buck, Foxconn offshores its manufacturing to mainland China, where they run a huge camp, er, facility, to knock out iPhones for $10 which they sell on to Apple under contract for a secret number of bux.

      Nobody in the plutocratic level or the US government is going to complain about Foxconn buying Lordstown. As a Taiwanese company, it gets two thumbs up from the people who actually matter and run all our plebeian lives for fun and profit.

      You’re welcome.

      • 0 avatar

        The Chinese CM / mini-Foxconn that I use is technically headquartered in Thailand. [shrug]

        But their main factory is in a major Chinese city, with specialized factories scattered around the world — including one they own in The United States.

        It’s a global business. [shrug]

  • avatar

    I think Elio needs a factory – at least a factory that isn’t an empty echo chamber. They could all three merge and their motto could be:
    “ Dumber Together!”

  • avatar

    I don’t think Foxconn are fools. There are subtleties behind that deal we don’t know about. May be Biden put pressure on Foxconn to start production anything in USA. Or it was Trump? Or both? Anyway, what difference it makes?

    • 0 avatar

      I use a company that I would describe as a mini-Foxconn.

      They are primarily an asian company, but they have sales offices in Califronia and own a small factory in Ohio. They’re truly trying to become a global company.

      I’m sure FoxConn has plans, and contingency plans, for what to do with this plant.

      I would be surprised of they were going to start making their premier products (like the iPhone) there, though. It’s far more likely that Foxconn is diversifying what they do so they can sell both sunscreen and umbrellas, so to speak.

  • avatar

    Aaaand the whole Lordstown scam comes full circle. Nicely done, Steve Burns.

  • avatar

    This will be interesting, Foxconn had a big circus here in Wisconsin about building a bazillion dollar plant, employ a bazillion people etc and people where tripping over each other to make it happen.

    Things are still occurring,but it’s been massively scaled down.

  • avatar

    Is this the company that lost the US postal contract due to the fact they did not have a valid testing vehicle?

Read all comments

Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Recent Comments

  • Bill Wade: I submit there will be rather large resistance to buying used EVs, especially ones with higher mileage.
  • Arthur Dailey: Having seen them both ‘in the flesh’ I prefer the exterior styling of the Maverick. It is...
  • swissAventador: Definitely cool. Just this past weekend, got a mini tour with a Santa Cruz owner and a couple other...
  • Matt Posky: Regulations and the law change on a regular basis. Neither are not stagnant. I don’t want to come...
  • Matt Posky: I’ve no personal attachment to diesel powertrains. But the fact that Europe prioritized and...

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Who We Are

  • Adam Tonge
  • Bozi Tatarevic
  • Corey Lewis
  • Jo Borras
  • Mark Baruth
  • Ronnie Schreiber