Mercedes-Benz Accidentally Shares Consumer Data
Mercedes-Benz inadvertently leaked the private data of some of its customers. The good news is that the number of affected people was alleged to have capped somewhere around one thousand at the time of this writing. But the bad news is that this wasn’t like having your e-mail or phone number getting out there. Contents reportedly included customers’ social security numbers, self-reported credit scores, driver licenses, addresses, and credit card information.
While the odds of you personally being affected remain low, the circumstances in which this took place are becoming increasingly common. Customers and interested buyers entering personal data into company and dealer websites between 2014 and 2017 had their data stored via a cloud storage platform. But it wasn’t as secure as it should be and Mercedes is now blaming the vendor for the security breach and subsequent embarrassment.
Unfortunately, the compensation the manufacturer is willing to offer leaves a lot to be desired and it sounds like there’s more digging to be done before we can definitively anything about the scope of the problem. It’s slightly odd that it would be limited to just a thousand people when the cloud storage platform became a receptacle for consumer data coming in from numerous sources and spanning several years.
Mercedes is offering people who had their data left out in the wind a complimentary two-year subscription to a credit-monitoring service. That could be especially handy if someone uses the breach to steal your identity and rack up a bunch of debt. But it hardly seems like sufficient compensation for someone who had their private information mishandled. For what it’s worth, the company is claiming it has the whole thing handled.
“Data security is a serious matter for MBUSA,” stated the manufacturer in an apologetic release. “Our vendor confirmed that the issue is corrected and that such an event cannot be replicated. We will continue our investigation to ensure that this situation is properly addressed.”
From Mercedes:
The investigation was initiated to assess the accessibility of approximately 1.6 million unique records. The vast majority of these records included information such as name, address, emails, phone numbers, and some purchased vehicle information. However, MBUSA would like to stress that a review of the total data entry record set determined that less than 1,000 individual Mercedes-Benz customers and interested buyers had additional personal information in a publicly accessible state. Mercedes-Benz USA has already begun notifying individuals, whose additional information was accessible, about this incident. Any individual who had credit card information, a driver’ s license number or a social security number included in the data will be offered complimentary 24-month subscription to a credit monitoring service. We will also notify the appropriate government agencies.
Any individuals who have questions or concerns about this incident should contact the Mercedes-Benz Customer Assistance Center at 1-800-367-6372.
This is the kind of stuff that has me often playing the skeptic when it comes to the automotive industry’s current infatuation with consumer data and cloud-based storage solutions. While dumping information onto the cloud helps it avoid it becoming subject to physical harm (e.g. natural disasters), you’re effectively handing it all over to a third party that can do whatever it likes and making it vulnerable to their screwups. And all the conveniences of being able to access files anywhere do pose a few alternative security risks.
Though we don’t have a sound solution other than recommending you think twice before handing sensitive info over to any organization. Businesses the world over are now heavily reliant on cloud-based storage and keen to hoover up as much data as they can find.
[Image: Franz12/Shutterstock]
Consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulations. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, he has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed about the automotive sector by national broadcasts, participated in a few amateur rallying events, and driven more rental cars than anyone ever should. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and learned to drive by twelve. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer and motorcycles.
More by Matt Posky
Latest Car Reviews
Read moreLatest Product Reviews
Read moreRecent Comments
- Tassos Ask me if I care for the idiotic vehicles less than 10% of whose owners use as INTENDED.
- Brandon The 2024 Mercedes-Benz E 350 4Matic looks like a compelling addition to the luxury sedan market. From the drive notes, it’s clear that Mercedes-Benz has maintained its commitment to blending performance with comfort. The handling and acceleration seem impressive, reflecting Mercedes’ signature blend of power and smoothness.
- Jmanb52 In this case clearly a driver responsbile for the accident. Lawyer just trying to add confusion to jude and or jury to think about it. I was on a jury once for an auto accident and one of the attorneys tried a few stunts to shift blame. Same thing is happening here. The companies pushing autonamous want to deal with fleet markets like the autonamous taxi companies rather than individual consumers. In my opinion I think they belvie that would be more predictable sales. Car gets to xyz milage time to replace. In my opinion they could never sell a full autonamous car to an individual because of a back and forth legal battles between owner and maker when there is a crash. They need to foget about all these take over driver aids. It is just causing more issues than it could prevent.
- Jmanb52 Short answer is NO! It has been a tread for manufactures to basicaly glue a tablet to an area of the dash and call it an infotament system. However there is not one of us on here that doesn't ahve a smart phone or tablet. With the android auto, and the Apple Carplay and bluetooth that conencts car spekers and mic to our headset, do we even need an Infotament system or just bluetooth connection to use hands free mic and spearkers or wired connection to USB port for connection to spearkers / mic and charge the phone. So maybe the QOTD should be do manufactures even need to provide an infotanement system or should they just provide an in dash holder for a tablet or smartphone?
- Jmanb52 In the past year I did some more research on EVs. I already knew for years they were heavier than a ICE car of the same model / class. Like the F150 lightning can be 1000 LBS heavier than its ICE counterpart. In the last year I read more on the size of breaks, tires and other items that take more resrouces to create and polute more in their wear. This was another nail in my corporate EV caufin. I already didn't have much care for them due to my height (over 6 feet) and they all have a bad desgin, over dependency on gimics, over computerized driving experience. If I ever did get one it would be a low range in town only type vehicle that I would convert an older car. There is no manufacture making EVs that is worth a penny of my money.
Comments
Join the conversation
So that's where Katherine Archuleta went after she left OPM.
Mercedes used to be the epitome of quality, understated luxury, class, comfort, engineering and durability. All the guys that worked there when that was the case have retired years ago. The new crew is entirely different. Only the name is the same. Its cache is gone; buying a Mercedes now means you are overpaying for something that is being underdelivered.