Housekeeping: There Are Gonna Be Some Changes Around Here

Tim Healey
by Tim Healey

Hi there. Your friendly Managing Editor here. I am checking in with you out there in B and B land to give you a quick update on what’s going on over here on this side of the computer/phone/tablet screen, over here in TTAC country.

We’re about to make a change to how we operate this site. Since before I was hired here, we’ve been chasing the news cycle along with our competition, putting out 8-10 posts per day pre COVID, and around 5 per day in recent months, thanks mostly to the pandemic causing the rush of industry news to slow from a gush to a trickle.

Well, my bosses and I have decided to focus less on the news and more on TTAC’s take on it. Even if that means fewer posts overall.

I’ll spare you the business reasons, other than to say we believe this change will be beneficial to the site and the company that owns it.

The editorial reason is simple: TTAC exists not to simply tell you the news about the automotive industry, but to drive the conversation about said news. We are here to cut through the spin and the B.S. and tell you truths that other sites skim over or ignore for whatever reason.

I’m biased, but I think we’ve mostly done a good job of that in my time here, the occasional misstep aside. But we can always do more. We already editorialize, analyze, and opine, but there’s room for more of that — and, we think, an appetite from you guys for more of it.

So that means flipping the mix. Right now, the site is 65-80 percent news, depending on the day, with the rest being reviews, features, and op-eds. We’re going to cut back on the news, especially straight news, and increase the percentage of the articles that drive conversation based on the news.

We simply think we add more value to the discourse by going more in-depth on topics than if we are just re-blogging what Automotive News already wrote.

That said, we will still run some stories that re-blog news broke by others, with or without our own take. Just less often.

Again, to be crystal clear, this doesn’t mean we don’t do any news, or that we won’t do straight “just the facts” news. Of course not. There will still be important news stories that we’d be remiss to skip, and sometimes we’ll have an opinion or analysis attached, and sometimes we’ll play it straight. As we’ve always done. But you will see fewer stories about small changes in some OEM’s C-suite or small recalls that have little to do with safety. The number won’t be zero, but it will be less than it has been.

We’ll still have news-heavy coverage of major events that break news, such as auto shows, of course.

This change does mean that depending on the day, you will likely see fewer posts — but the posts you do see will be longer, more deeply researched, and perhaps contain more original reporting.

What does this mean for your favorite features? Very little. Rare Rides, B/D/B, car reviews, junkyard finds, and most of the rest aren’t going anywhere. The timing of publication may change a bit, and mild format tweaks are always possible, but otherwise, they will continue to be part of TTAC. Except for Ace of Base, which became a COVID-related casualty thanks to the dearth of new-car launches in 2020. Mr. Guy and I are already brainstorming how to replace it.

You may also see some new bylines on the site, including some that you haven’t seen on these digital pages in years. You’ll also continue to see the same masthead you see now, except for Jason — he has left us to pursue other opportunities and we wish him well.

(For those wondering about Bark, Ronnie, and Bozi, they remain on the roster, but are all busy with other projects at the moment.)

You might even see your own bylines here. That’s right: As part of this shift, I am putting out a call for pitches. If you have ideas for stories about the industry that you think fit TTAC’s style and mission, feel free to reach out. I can’t promise I’ll reply to everyone, but if I like it, I’ll be in touch.

That’s on a freelance basis, to be clear — we are not looking to hire a new newsbot/news contributor at this time.

One last thing: The current commenting policies and moderation operations remain in place, unchanged.

That, as they say, is that. If you have questions or feedback, sound off below.

[Image: Sorn340 Studio Images/Shutterstock.com]

Tim Healey
Tim Healey

Tim Healey grew up around the auto-parts business and has always had a love for cars — his parents joke his first word was “‘Vette”. Despite this, he wanted to pursue a career in sports writing but he ended up falling semi-accidentally into the automotive-journalism industry, first at Consumer Guide Automotive and later at Web2Carz.com. He also worked as an industry analyst at Mintel Group and freelanced for About.com, CarFax, Vehix.com, High Gear Media, Torque News, FutureCar.com, Cars.com, among others, and of course Vertical Scope sites such as AutoGuide.com, Off-Road.com, and HybridCars.com. He’s an urbanite and as such, doesn’t need a daily driver, but if he had one, it would be compact, sporty, and have a manual transmission.

More by Tim Healey

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 50 comments
  • JaVeyron JaVeyron on Jun 05, 2021

    I’m honestly excited to hear that a business case can be made for quality, unique writing, which goes against the trend of content mill clickbaity crap. This is the perfect place for deep dives, inside baseball, and cutting through marketing spin, since it would fit TTAC’s brand and differentiate it from other sites. Looking forward to read the new stuff!

  • Speedlaw Speedlaw on Jun 09, 2021

    more moderation of political rants please. I already have twitter for the Two Minutes' Hate.

  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh Elon hates bad press (hence TWITTER circus) So the press jumping up and down screaming ''musk fails cheap EV'' is likely ego-driving this response as per normal ..not to side with tesla or musk but canceling the 25k EV was a good move, selling a EV for barely above cost is a terrible idea in a market where it seems EV saturation is hitting peak
  • 1995 SC Wife has a new Ridgeline and it came with 2 years so I don't have to think about it for a while.My FIAT needed a battery (the 12V...not the drive battery), a replacement steering column cover and I had to buy a Tesla Charging adapter to use the destination charger at one of the places I frequent. Also had to replace the charge cable because I am an idiot and ran the stock one over and destroyed the connector. Around 600 bucks all in there but 250 is because of the cable.The Thunderbird has needed much the past year. ABS Pump - 300. Master Cylinder 100. Tool to bleed ABS 350 (Welcome to pre OBD2 electronics), Amp for Stereo -250, Motor mounts 150, Injectors 300, Airbag Module - 15 at the u pull it, Belts and hoses, 100 - Plugs and wires 100, Trans fluid, filter and replacement pan, 150, ignition lock cylinder and rekey - 125, Cassette Player mechanism - 15 bucks at the U Pull it, and a ton of time to do things like replace the grease in the power seat motots (it was hard and the seats wouldn't move when cold), Rear pinion seal - 15 buckjs, Fix a million broken tabs in the dash surround, recap the ride control module and all. My wife would say more, but my Math has me around 2 grand. Still needs an exhaust manifold gasket and the drivers side window acts up from time to time. I do it all but if I were paying someone that would be rough. It's 30 this year though so I roll with it. You'll have times like these running old junk.
  • 3-On-The-Tree Besides for the sake of emissions I don’t understand why the OEM’s went with small displacement twin turbo engines in heavy trucks. Like you guys stated above there really isn’t a MPG advantage. Plus that engine is under stress pulling that truck around then you hit it with turbos, more rpm’s , air, fuel, heat. My F-150 Ecoboost 3.5 went through one turbo replacement and the other was leaking. l’ll stick with my 2021 V8 Tundra.
  • Syke What I'll never understand about economics reporting: $1.1 billion net income is a mark of failure? Anyone with half a brain recognizes that Tesla is slowly settling in to becoming just another EV manufacturer, now that the legacy manufacturers have gained a sense of reality and quit tripping over their own feet in converting their product lines. Who is stupid enough to believe that Tesla is going to remain 90% of the EV market for the next ten years?Or is it just cheap headlines to highlight another Tesla "problem"?
  • Rna65689660 I had an AMG G-Wagon roar past me at night doing 90 - 100. What a glorious sound. This won’t get the same vibe.
Next