Rare Rides: The 1987 Chevrolet Nova Hatchback, the All-American Corolla

Corey Lewis
by Corey Lewis

Today’s Rare Ride was the final iteration of the Chevrolet Nova nameplate in North America. An economy car that largely vanished from roads long ago, today’s hatchback example is very clean and very NUMMI.

The Nova nameplate had a long history at Chevrolet and was attached to the brand’s compact offering for the 1962 model year. GM sought a competitor for the successful Ford Falcon introduced in ’59 and needed it fast. Originally the model was called Chevy II, as GM management declined the suggested Nova name because it didn’t start with a letter C. Nova became the top trim of the Chevy II initially and remained a trim until 1969 when it took over as model designation. Nova was in its third generation by 1968 and remained on the X-body platform through its fourth and fifth generations, which carried the model through 1979. At that point, the name took a break until its triumphant return in 1985.

The new ’85 Nova was a joint venture / rebadging between GM and Toyota, which resulted in Corolla-based cars sold under GM brands. Initially, the resulting cars were Chevrolets, then Geos, and finally Chevrolets again. The Nova resided on the AE82 Corolla platform, which GM called S for its purposes. Corollas and Novas were built together in Fremont, California at the NUMMI plant which now loosely assembles Tesla vehicles.

Initially, the only body style available was an upright four-door sedan, sold only in the Midwest region. Shortly thereafter, a five-door hatch was added and sales expanded across North America. The Nova joined other Japanese rebranding exercises like the Chevy Sprint and Spectrum, both of which were launched in their own regions before going nationwide. Sprint was assigned to the west coast, and Spectrum to the east.

All examples of Nova had a 1.6-liter engine, which was offered in two different versions depending upon the model year. The initial 1.6 SOHC had a carburetor and produced 74 horsepower. Transmissions at the time were a three-speed auto or five-speed manual. For 1988 the sportier fuel-injected Twin-Cam used a DOHC version of the 1.6-liter engine shared with the Corolla FX16, good for a more impressive 110 horses. Twin-Cam versions used a four-speed auto instead of the three. However, the Twin-Cam was of limited appeal given its price hike ($11,395) over the standard Nova’s ask of $8,800, and just 3,300 were produced.

1988 was the end of the line for Nova anyway, as GM conducted a shift in strategy. The E90 Corolla platform was ready and thus was its rebadge as the Geo Prizm. Starting in 1989, GM separated out its Japanese rebadges into their own brand at Geo. Nova vanished from view as the Prizm was introduced early in 1989 for the 1990 model year, and GM started selling lots of Geos.

Today’s incredibly preserved Nova hatchback is the sort of super basic economy car no longer offered in this market. Manual windows, manual locks, and little steel wheels. The only options are the three-speed and air conditioning, which you’ll need with all that greenhouse. The seller has ideas on what you could use the Nova for, which is always a good sign. Yours at $5,850.

[Images: GM]

Corey Lewis
Corey Lewis

Interested in lots of cars and their various historical contexts. Started writing articles for TTAC in late 2016, when my first posts were QOTDs. From there I started a few new series like Rare Rides, Buy/Drive/Burn, Abandoned History, and most recently Rare Rides Icons. Operating from a home base in Cincinnati, Ohio, a relative auto journalist dead zone. Many of my articles are prompted by something I'll see on social media that sparks my interest and causes me to research. Finding articles and information from the early days of the internet and beyond that covers the little details lost to time: trim packages, color and wheel choices, interior fabrics. Beyond those, I'm fascinated by automotive industry experiments, both failures and successes. Lately I've taken an interest in AI, and generating "what if" type images for car models long dead. Reincarnating a modern Toyota Paseo, Lincoln Mark IX, or Isuzu Trooper through a text prompt is fun. Fun to post them on Twitter too, and watch people overreact. To that end, the social media I use most is Twitter, @CoreyLewis86. I also contribute pieces for Forbes Wheels and Forbes Home.

More by Corey Lewis

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 31 comments
  • Jeff S Jeff S on Apr 24, 2021

    I had a friend who had a 1988 red Nova sedan with a 5 speed manual. Very reliable.

  • JEFFSHADOW JEFFSHADOW on Apr 25, 2021

    In 1987 a cashier at my Ralphs supermarket in Buena Park, California had just bought one of these Novas. She really thought it was a Chevrolet and had no knowledge of the shared production platform. That was fine with me as no information offered would matter to her. She absolutely loved that car. In later years author Harlan Ellison became the spokesperson for the Geo brand; his presence was announced as "Noted Futurist". He did drive Geos for awhile and then went to the Honda Civic with his "HE" California license plate. Harlan passed away on June 28, 2018. The old Honda was still in his driveway when I stopped by on June 25 after the Highway Earth car show in Beverly Hills. We drove our 2002 Oldsmobile Intrigue GLS that time. His 1947 Packard was still parked at the right side open garage.

  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh [h3]Wake me up when it is a 1989 635Csi with a M88/3[/h3]
  • BrandX "I can charge using the 240V outlets, sure, but it’s slow."No it's not. That's what all home chargers use - 240V.
  • Jalop1991 does the odometer represent itself in an analog fashion? Will the numbers roll slowly and stop wherever, or do they just blink to the next number like any old boring modern car?
  • MaintenanceCosts E34 535i may be, for my money, the most desirable BMW ever built. (It's either it or the E34 M5.) Skeptical of these mods but they might be worth undoing.
  • Arthur Dailey What a load of cow patties from fat cat politicians, swilling at the trough of their rich backers. Business is all for `free markets` when it benefits them. But are very quick to hold their hands out for government tax credits, tax breaks or government contracts. And business executives are unwilling to limit their power over their workers. Business executives are trained to `divide and conquer` by pitting workers against each other for raises or promotions. As for the fat cat politicians what about legislating a living wage, so workers don't have to worry about holding down multiple jobs or begging for raises? And what about actually criminally charging those who hire people who are not legally illegible to work? Remember that it is business interests who regularly lobby for greater immigration. If you are a good and fair employer, your workers will never feel the need to speak to a union. And if you are not a good employer, then hopefully 'you get the union that you deserve'.
Next