By on April 28, 2021

Ford badge emblem logo

On Tuesday, Ford Motor Co. said it would be putting $185 million toward the construction of a research and development site focused on electric vehicle battery development in southeast Michigan. The facility will be called Ford Ion Park and employ roughly 150 full-time employees that will be focusing on small-scale projects that it hopes might lead to technological breakthroughs offering it a competitive advantage.

While the facility was said to also be capable of manufacturing cells, Ford made it clear during the teleconference that it won’t be operating as a battery plant. Any packs assembled at the R&D center are likely to exist exclusively for evaluation, with the luckiest batteries being installed into concept or test vehicles. 

“We’re already scaling production of all-electric vehicles around the world as more customers experience and crave the fun-to-drive benefits of electric vehicles with zero emissions,” stated Hau Thai-Tang, Ford’s chief product platform and operations officer. “Investing in more battery R&D ultimately will help us speed the process to deliver more, even better, lower cost EVs for customers over time.”

But as reporters began to probe the automaker on whether or not that means it will eventually pivot toward manufacturing its own batteries, Ford was less committal — stating that it preferred to maintain its existing partnerships with battery suppliers and would continue working with outside entities in the future.

Considering the timing of this announcement, it was clear that this was an issue on many people’s minds. While the semiconductor shortage has been forcing most manufacturers to stall production this year, Blue Oval was one of the automakers suffering the worst. Combine that with the problems SK Innovation (Ford’s main battery supplier) has been having of late and it starts to seem like management started developing doubts about just-in-time supply chains. But Ford Ion Park doesn’t really seem to be up to the task of converting the company into becoming self-reliant on the battery front.

CEO Jim Farley has suggested it’s all about incremental growth. After all, it wasn’t more than a few months ago when his predecessor (former CEO Jim Hackett) said that there wasn’t any real advantage to vertically integrate battery production. But he’s also no longer with the company and it’s easy to speculate as to why.

Farley spent the last month telling the press that Ford has basically been shopping around to see the lay of the land up until now. But this is the year the real work allegedly begins by way of a $22-billion investment to modernize its facilities and products. Though the money will be funneled in through 2025 and represents an increase from the original $11 billion it planned on spending already.

Semiconductors came up during the conference call about Ford Ion Park, with Thai-Tang echoing statements made by Farley about how this has been a learning experience on how best to manage supply chains. He said the solution is to make Ford a more flexible automaker and work more closely with suppliers while it remains on the lookout for technological breakthroughs — something the new R&D center could help with.

The 200,000-square-foot facility is supposed to open before the start of 2023 and work closely with the Battery Benchmarking and Test Laboratory located in nearby Allen Park (go Jaguars).

[Image: Ford Motor Co.]

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

10 Comments on “Ford Spending $185 Million on New Battery R&D Center...”


  • avatar
    SCE to AUX

    Nothing wrong with doing R&D, but the effort seems half-hearted if it’s just to learn academic stuff without applying it to your own production facility.

    When the ‘real’ auto mfrs look at Tesla’s Gigafactories, what do they think is going on? Nobody can match Tesla for their energy density, drivetrain efficiency, long life, power output, scalability, and cost management. This didn’t happen by accident.

    Batteries are not the commodities people think they are, so it looks like some mfrs are realizing this about a decade later than Tesla. But if Ford isn’t willing to go all-in on its own battery production facility, don’t expect to see a fleet of volume EVs from them for many years to come.

    • 0 avatar
      mcs

      Tesla’s first step towards battery manufacturing was opening a battery lab. Ford does have close ties to Factorial Energy through Mark Fields and they should use that connection to scoop them up. At this point, they need to head towards solid-state. Without solid-state they’ll be in big trouble in 5 years or so when Toyota and other manufacturers figure out solid-state mass production. They also need to take a close look at Na-Ion. The density isn’t as good as Li-Ion yet, but not that far behind. If they can just push it to at least 300 Wh/kg, I think it would be the technology of choice.

  • avatar
    mcs

    ” in nearby Allen Park (go Jaguars).”

    If it’s on Enterprise Drive or over by the Lion’s facility, that’s Northern Allen Park and the MHS Cardinals, not the AHS Jaguars.

  • avatar

    Good morning! Ford finally woke up.

  • avatar
    tylanner

    Gonna be difficult for a company that hasn’t done anything other than reform plastic and sheetmetal around the same basic machine for decades…

  • avatar
    Kendahl

    It’s a start. In another ten years, they might catch up to Tesla.

  • avatar
    jimmyy

    Doing R&D in Michigan is like flushing money down the toilet. High value R&D should be done in NYC, Boston, LA, SD, SF, or Seattle. No where else has the brain power needed.

  • avatar
    schmitt trigger

    Perhaps even Austin,TX.

    Ford is belatedly putting their feet on the water, while other companies are already swimming competition laps.

  • avatar
    EBFlex

    They can’t use the stupid, condemned train station for this?

  • avatar
    ToolGuy

    “The facility will be called Ford Ion Park”

    • Ok, but if the ions are parked there won’t be much current flow.

    • Is Ford going negative? (at least two jokes in those four words – read carefully)

    [Anode you would say that – I’m only here Faraday.]

    Cue the soundtrack and cut to the montage as Ford makes 17 years worth of progress in the next 17 months:
    https://youtu.be/p44G0U4sLCE

    (We can squeeze royalties to Joe Esposito et al into the $22B total. Any montage scenes which need to be re-shot can be done at Flat Rock Assembly.)

Read all comments

Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Recent Comments

  • Sid SB: Great to see that no said it needs a turbo.
  • Dan: I like big sedans and this is a nice looking car but I won’t buy a four and $55,000 for the V6 –...
  • Commodore P: My daily driver is a 2008 Civic LX in that exact Galaxy Gray. Thirteen years and 209,000 miles of...
  • Tele Vision: I’d go for a 2012 330i instead of this abomination. Update the VANOS system and you’re...
  • BSttac: When the Accord is simply better in every way if you can “live” without AWD

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Who We Are

  • Adam Tonge
  • Bozi Tatarevic
  • Corey Lewis
  • Mark Baruth
  • Ronnie Schreiber