Chip Shortage Expands, GM Forced to Idle Factories

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

While the Great Semiconductor Shortage of 2021 probably isn’t going to the defining historical topic of the modern era, it’s presently doing a number on the automotive industry. Volkswagen Group, Ford, Mazda, Nissan, Subaru Corp., Toyota, and Stellantis have all reported the need to scale back production this year.

On Wednesday, General Motors said that it would also have to handle the issue by closing down four plants next week. Affected sites include Kansas’ Fairfax Assembly, Ontario’s CAMI Assembly, and Mexico’s San Luis Potosí Assembly. GM Korea will likewise be operating Bupyeong 2 at half capacity, according to Reuters.

From Reuters:

GM did not disclose how much volume it would lose or which supplier was affected by the chip shortage, but said the focus has been on keeping production running at plants building the highest-profit vehicles — full-size pickup trucks and SUVs as well as the Chevrolet Corvette sports car. GM said it intends to make up as much lost production as possible.

“Despite our mitigation efforts, the semiconductor shortage will impact GM production in 2021,” GM spokesman David Barnas told Reuters in a statement.

“Semiconductor supply for the global auto industry remains very fluid,” he added. “Our supply chain organization is working closely with our supply base to find solutions for our suppliers’ semiconductor requirements and to mitigate impacts on GM.”

The resulting lost production around the globe is currently estimated to account for 564,000 vehicles, according to AutoForecast Solutions. However, the total number could caress 1 million units if the chip supply doesn’t improve.

But why is there a shortage in the first place?

Other than the obvious answer of COVID-19 restrictions mangling the supply chains of most industries, general demand for semiconductors has skyrocketed. Your author recently found himself needing to purchase some ear protection and noticed that even the low-end muffs offered Bluetooth in addition to the auxiliary audio jack. That swiftly led to the realization that practically every new product comes equipped with Wi-Fi and/or Bluetooth these days. Combine that Huawei going on a chip-buying spree ahead of the U.S. semiconductor ban and the broader issue begins to come into focus. We’re cramming chips everywhere they might fit and simply can’t build them fast enough.

This has also left automakers tugging at their collars when discussing what Q1 might look like. Volvo Cars was the latest, noting that it had secured a healthy supply of semiconductor chips for the next few weeks as it fretted about the future. “So, short-term no disturbance … But there is of course a big risk that it could come here during the first quarter. But it is very hard to forecast,” Volvo CEO Håkan Samuelsson explained on Thursday.

With Qualcomm having just announced that it’s also having trouble meeting demand as chip shortages continue to spread, Samuelsson’s words likely apply as much to Volvo as it does the automotive sector as a whole.

[Image: General Motors]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 9 comments
  • Dusterdude Dusterdude on Feb 06, 2021

    JIT fails again . For certain items it’s great , for other items that are more scarce ( or need to be sourced overseas) it doesn’t make sense.. ( even though means higher investment cost and some more inventory write offs .. ) In 2014/5 I worked for a mid sized company ( ~$50 million in sales as Supply Chain Mgr and made sure we weren’t running JIT on electronics for the product. Even though that industry had a 6. -8 week lead time for finished product as smaller player we promised 5 years). For giggles I called an employee at previous employer last week to see how things were going , and they said “ not too well we are short on electronics so can’t ship many orders in regular lead time “.

  • Dusterdude Dusterdude on Feb 06, 2021

    Above should say we promised 5 WEEKS for finished product delivery ( not years ! ) And current supply chain mgr is big believer in JIT

  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh I'd rather they have the old sweep gauges, the hhuuggee left to right speedometer from the 40's and 50's where the needle went from lefty to right like in my 1969 Nova
  • Buickman I like it!
  • JMII Hyundai Santa Cruz, which doesn't do "truck" things as well as the Maverick does.How so? I see this repeated often with no reference to exactly what it does better.As a Santa Cruz owner the only things the Mav does better is price on lower trims and fuel economy with the hybrid. The Mav's bed is a bit bigger but only when the SC has the roll-top bed cover, without this they are the same size. The Mav has an off road package and a towing package the SC lacks but these are just some parts differences. And even with the tow package the Hyundai is rated to tow 1,000lbs more then the Ford. The SC now has XRT trim that beefs up the looks if your into the off-roader vibe. As both vehicles are soft-roaders neither are rock crawling just because of some extra bits Ford tacked on.I'm still loving my SC (at 9k in mileage). I don't see any advantages to the Ford when you are looking at the medium to top end trims of both vehicles. If you want to save money and gas then the Ford becomes the right choice. You will get a cheaper interior but many are fine with this, especially if don't like the all touch controls on the SC. However this has been changed in the '25 models in which buttons and knobs have returned.
  • Analoggrotto I'd feel proper silly staring at an LCD pretending to be real gauges.
  • Gray gm should hang their wimpy logo on a strip mall next to Saul Goodman's office.
Next