2021 Nissan Altima SR VC-Turbo Review - Seeking Extra Raciness

Chris Tonn
by Chris Tonn
Fast Facts

2021 Nissan Altima SR FWD VC-Turbo

2.0-liter turbocharged four-cylinder (236hp @ 5,600 rpm, 267 lb-ft @ 4,000 rpm)
Continuously-variable transmission, front-wheel drive
25 city / 34 highway / 29 combined (EPA Rating, MPG)
Base Price: $31,575 US
As Tested: $32,905 US
Prices include $925 destination charge in the United States. 2.0 turbo engine not available in Canada.

Just then, they came in sight of thirty or forty sporty crossovers that rise from that plain. Do you see over yonder, friend Sancho, thirty or forty hulking giants? I intend to do battle with them and slay them.

Such is the life of the sports-sedan enthusiast these days, tilting at the hulking windmills as we pray for a low, lithe vehicle with handling and power aplenty – matched with a real trunk. We ask for these things from automakers who have proven that once upon a time, such mythical creatures did indeed exist and did indeed move from showroom floors in appreciable numbers.

I’d hoped beyond hope that the 2021 Nissan Altima SR on these pages might have rekindled the old four-door sportscar soul deep within Nissan. See those “SR” letters? They look awfully close to the “SE-R” trim that graced generations of sporty Sentras and even an Altima way back when. “VC-Turbo,” too, hints at performance potential. Can this turbocharged sedan meet the increasingly quixotic and depressingly small market for three-box motors with verve?

In short, no. The Altima VC-Turbo is not a sports sedan. It’s a credible midpriced family sedan with better than average power, but there is nothing sporty about this car. That’s OK, really – while I prefer some all-around performance with my sedan, many more people will be perfectly content with a touch of extra power on an otherwise-sedate cruiser. The Altima does the daily driving thing just fine, with good ride quality and quiet, calm road manners.

The engine is the star here – we’ve talked about the variable-compression turbocharged four, theoretically giving V6 performance with four-cylinder economy. It mostly succeeds – for a three-MPG-combined EPA penalty (29 combined for the VC-Turbo versus 32 combined for a front-drive 2.5-liter Altima) you get 48 additional horsepower and 87 lb-ft of torque. The torque figure is significant – this positively jumps off the line with gusto. Nissan persists with the CVT, however, which causes the engine to drone at frequently changing pitch while cruising on the interstate. Hopefully, now that the Pathfinder is reverting to a 9-speed automatic, the great CVT experiment will begin to wind down.

Styling is handsome, but by this point in the product cycle, rather familiar. It will neither turn heads nor offend. The interior, similarly, is mostly bland – brightened a bit by orange stitching on the console, dash, and steering wheel. The faux-carbon weave trim on places like the door panels is a bit garish, I’m afraid – but the seats are magical. Nissan has been putting some seriously great chairs in their mainstream products of late. I’d say this is one of the best places I’ve put my butt in a long time.

My biggest problem with this package? As usual, it’s the price. $30,700 plus destination fees gives a big engine in a midrange package – a matching SR trim with the lesser 2.5-liter four would be over four thousand dollars less expensive. The VC-Turbo engine is only available in this SR trim, with no real options to speak of save premium paint, floor mats, and a spoiler. This premium-priced sedan has mid-level trim – it doesn’t offer Nissan’s excellent ProPilot Assist (adaptive cruise control and steering assist), nor does it offer dual-zone climate control, both of which are standard on the 2.5SL at $29,990 plus D&D. Nor can the powerful engine be fitted to the excellent all-wheel-drive Altima – which is why you can’t get this in the AWD-only Canada market.

If we look beyond Nissan at other competitors, it’s hard to overlook the 252 horses available in the Honda Accord Sport 2.0T. Sadly, the Accord’s manual is no longer, but that car remains the genuine sports sedan I fell in love with a couple of years back. And if it’s power you want, Toyota still offers a V6 in the Camry – 301 horses worth! Both of the competitors have a real automatic transmission, rather than the fun-sapping CVT found in the Nissan.

Nissan, it seems, has a long tradition of letting their engineers pursue new solutions and bringing them to market. Witness the SuperHICAS four-wheel steering of the Eighties and the CVT craze of the past decade or so among many other flights of fancy best suited to CAD programs rather than the rigid Excel screens of the beancounters. The VC-Turbo engine is another interesting solution, but I’m not sure it’s the right solution here in the Altima. The additional power is nice, but not for what you have to give up to get that power. The Nissan Altima VC-Turbo really should be a much better sports sedan fighter than it is in the tilt against the ever-present crossover threat.

[Images: © 2021 Chris Tonn]

Chris Tonn
Chris Tonn

Some enthusiasts say they were born with gasoline in their veins. Chris Tonn, on the other hand, had rust flakes in his eyes nearly since birth. Living in salty Ohio and being hopelessly addicted to vintage British and Japanese steel will do that to you. His work has appeared in eBay Motors, Hagerty, The Truth About Cars, Reader's Digest, AutoGuide, Family Handyman, and Jalopnik. He is a member of the Midwest Automotive Media Association, and he's currently looking for the safety glasses he just set down somewhere.

More by Chris Tonn

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 21 comments
  • Speedlaw Speedlaw on Feb 20, 2021

    Sport Sedan and CVT don't go together.

  • Conslaw Conslaw on Feb 20, 2021

    In the Summer of 2019 my wife and I drove a 2019 Altima rental on a 2500 road trip, and we though it was about the perfect car for our mid-country interstate outing. Even with 80-MPH speed limits half of the time we got just about 40mpg. The 2.5 liter engine provided plenty of power. It was comfortable, quiet. Nice size trunk, and all the modern electronic safety goodies like blind spot warning, smart cruise control, etc.

  • Jeff Self driving cars are not ready for prime time.
  • Lichtronamo Watch as the non-us based automakers shift more production to Mexico in the future.
  • 28-Cars-Later " Electrek recently dug around in Tesla’s online parts catalog and found that the windshield costs a whopping $1,900 to replace.To be fair, that’s around what a Mercedes S-Class or Rivian windshield costs, but the Tesla’s glass is unique because of its shape. It’s also worth noting that most insurance plans have glass replacement options that can make the repair a low- or zero-cost issue. "Now I understand why my insurance is so high despite no claims for years and about 7,500 annual miles between three cars.
  • AMcA My theory is that that when the Big 3 gave away the store to the UAW in the last contract, there was a side deal in which the UAW promised to go after the non-organized transplant plants. Even the UAW understands that if the wage differential gets too high it's gonna kill the golden goose.
  • MKizzy Why else does range matter? Because in the EV advocate's dream scenario of a post-ICE future, the average multi-car household will find itself with more EVs in their garages and driveways than places to plug them in or the capacity to charge then all at once without significant electrical upgrades. Unless each vehicle has enough range to allow for multiple days without plugging in, fighting over charging access in multi-EV households will be right up there with finances for causes of domestic strife.
Next