Rare Rides: The 1967 Hino Contessa 1300S, Rear-engine Blip on the Radar

Corey Lewis
by Corey Lewis

Hino is a well-known producer of commercial vehicles today and has been in the commercial truck market since World War II. But for a short while in the Sixties, they built their own rear-engine passenger car.

Say hello to Contessa.

The Contessa traced its roots back to the Renault 4CV. Produced between 1947 and 1961, Renault produced over a million examples of its small family four-door. Aside from its French production location, the 4CV was built under license in Spain, Australia, and Japan.

Japanese production started in 1953, and the 4CV was assembled under license by Hino as the Hino Renault 4CV. The company’s first passenger car, Hino kept building the Renault until its cancellation in 1961. Toward the end of the 4CV’s life, the people at Hino realized they didn’t want to stop producing a passenger car, and set their engineers to work.

When the 4CV ended production, the rear-engine Contessa 900 was ready to take its place at Hino dealerships. Hino re-engineered the 4CV and gave it a larger wheelbase, and a longer and wider body with updated styling for the Sixties. Unlike its Renault-designed predecessor, the additional size meant the Contessa seated five instead of four and was much more desirable as a family sedan. Also available was the upscale looking Contessa Sprint, a two-door coupe. The Contessa was powered by an 893-cc inline-four engine that was a larger derivation of Renault’s 4CV mill. 35 horsepower made for an (eventual) top speed of 68 miles per hour. Originally the transmission was a three-speed on the tree, which was later swapped for a four-speed with a Hino-designed electromagnetic clutch.

Contessa existed in its first generation through 1964, when a new 1300 model took its place. Larger and more powerful than its predecessor, it also wore a new body designed by Giovanni Michelotti. Aside from new styling, the most important change to Contessa was its engine. Now, the car was powered by a 1.3-liter inline-four developed by Hino. A revised Sprint coupe followed the sedan with an introduction in 1965. This time, the Sprint had a performance edge over the sedan: Higher compression in the Sprint’s engine meant a jump in horsepower from 54 to 64.

The Contessa 1300 remained in production through 1966, at which point the company fell under Toyota’s ownership umbrella. Not fond of small car competition, Contessa production was halted by March 1967. A few more Contessas were assembled through 1968 and 1969, as Toyota used up remaining body shells and utilized on-hand Toyota parts when Hino part supplies ran out. Hino would never again produce a passenger car.

Today’s Rare Ride is from the end of Contessa production, a 1967 example. Its series of owners have included a Hino dealer, the Hino factory, as well as a museum. In 54 years it’s traveled 1,708 miles. Yours in New Zealand for $21,459.

[Image: Hino]

Corey Lewis
Corey Lewis

Interested in lots of cars and their various historical contexts. Started writing articles for TTAC in late 2016, when my first posts were QOTDs. From there I started a few new series like Rare Rides, Buy/Drive/Burn, Abandoned History, and most recently Rare Rides Icons. Operating from a home base in Cincinnati, Ohio, a relative auto journalist dead zone. Many of my articles are prompted by something I'll see on social media that sparks my interest and causes me to research. Finding articles and information from the early days of the internet and beyond that covers the little details lost to time: trim packages, color and wheel choices, interior fabrics. Beyond those, I'm fascinated by automotive industry experiments, both failures and successes. Lately I've taken an interest in AI, and generating "what if" type images for car models long dead. Reincarnating a modern Toyota Paseo, Lincoln Mark IX, or Isuzu Trooper through a text prompt is fun. Fun to post them on Twitter too, and watch people overreact. To that end, the social media I use most is Twitter, @CoreyLewis86. I also contribute pieces for Forbes Wheels and Forbes Home.

More by Corey Lewis

Comments
Join the conversation
5 of 26 comments
  • Peeryog Peeryog on Jan 15, 2021

    Man, I know this is small car but she seems to be towering over it in this photo and like she would awkwardly fill any of the positions in the car if she sat in them. Maybe because I just came from the previous article where the womans shoulder barely made the top of the wheel arch.

  • Arthur Dailey Arthur Dailey on Jan 16, 2021

    Why hasn't anyone here mentioned the similarities to the Hillman Imp?

    • Msquare Msquare on Jan 16, 2021

      Because the Imp came out in 1963, after the Contessa and long after the 4CV. If anything, the Imp represented the peak of development for this configuration. The Mini had already established the future of smaller cars, and it was front engine and front drive. While some designs soldiered on into the 1970's, very little new came out after the Imp. The rear engine was a dead end in car design, front drive proving itself superior in every way. By the end of the 1970's, only old designs like the Beetle and Porsche 911 remained in production.

  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh I own my house 100% paid for at age 52. the answer is still NO.-28k (realistically) would take 8 years to offset my gas truck even with its constant repair bills (thanks chevy)-Still takes too long to charge UNTIL solidsate batteries are a thing and 80% in 15 minutes becomes a reality (for ME anyways, i get others are willing to wait)For the rest of the market, especially people in dense cityscape, apartments dens rentals it just isnt feasible yet IMO.
  • ToolGuy I do like the fuel economy of a 6-cylinder engine. 😉
  • Carson D I'd go with the RAV4. It will last forever, and someone will pay you for it if you ever lose your survival instincts.
  • THX1136 A less expensive EV would make it more attractive. For the record, I've never purchased a brand new vehicle as I have never been able to afford anything but used. I think the same would apply to an EV. I also tend to keep a vehicle way longer than most folks do - 10+ years. If there was a more affordable one right now then other things come to bear. There are currently no chargers in my immediate area (town of 16K). I don't know if I can afford to install the necessary electrical service to put one in my car port right now either. Other than all that, I would want to buy what I like from a cosmetic standpoint. That would be a Charger EV which, right now, doesn't exist and I couldn't afford anyway. I would not buy an EV just to be buying an EV. Nothing against them either. Most of my constraints are purely financial being 71 with a disabled wife and on a fixed income.
  • ToolGuy Two more thoughts, ok three:a) Will this affordable EV have expressive C/D pillars, detailing on the rocker panels and many many things happening around the headlamps? Asking for a friend.b) Will this affordable EV have interior soft touch plastics and materials lifted directly from a European luxury sedan? Because if it does not, the automotive journalists are going to mention it and that will definitely spoil my purchase decision.c) Whatever the nominal range is, I need it to be 2 miles more, otherwise no deal. (+2 rule is iterative)
Next