Chevrolet Teases Bolt 'EUV' One Component at a Time

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Chevrolet has issued a close-up shot of the Bolt EUV to maximize its marketing mileage ahead of the official debut. It looks like we’ll be seeing the “Electric Utility Vehicle” (crossover) delivered to us piecemeal as General Motors has already issued a darkened silhouette of the model’s exterior and a similarly shadowy peak of what’s going on inside.

Carefully spaced to drop right when the public forgot that Chevy was building the Bolt’s bigger brother, we’ve been given our first image of the model with the correct lighting — and it actually gives us a real sense of what the automobile might look like when the lid is finally lifted.

Noting that the vehicle will receive sequential front (and presumably rear) turn signals, GM gave away that they would be integrated into running lights riding high on the front fascia. It’s even supposed to supplant the unit’s white light with majestic amber in a sweeping motion. That means the actual headlamps should be situated much lower on the vehicle — like on the Nissan Juke, Hyundai Kona, or Chevrolet’s own Trailblazer.

While we don’t know much else about the vehicle, it’ll obviously be larger than the hatchback with some additional ground clearance. GM told us to expect the EUV to be about 3 inches longer than the Bolt EV and provide a bit more legroom for occupants riding in the rear. It’s also supposed to be the company’s first battery-electric to get Super Cruise functionality now that the system is migrating away from Cadillac in an attempt to saturate the whole of GM’s lineup.

Chevrolet will release more details about the 2022 Bolt EUV in the coming months. GM is anticipating production to start next summer, so we imagine the official debut will take place in spring of 2021. Pricing is TBD but we’d imagine the company will probably tack a few grand onto the Bolt MSRP. Expect pricing to start somewhere around $41,000 for the base crossover.

[Image: General Motors]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
7 of 21 comments
  • Akear Akear on Dec 16, 2020

    With the exception of the Fiat 500, the Bolt is the nation's slowest selling compact sized vehicle. Anything with the Bolts name is garbage.

    • See 4 previous
    • Mcs Mcs on Dec 17, 2020

      @Garrett "I would rather have a Fiat 500 than a Bolt. At least the Fiat presents the opportunity to have some silly fun." The Bolt is basically something the size of a Honda Fit with 200 hp. The car magazines timed it 0-60 in 6.3 seconds. That's faster than any Fiat 500. It might even edge out a Civic Si. The new dual-motor versions should be even faster. People autocross them and the aftermarket has coil-overs and brake kits for it. https://ev-mods.com/collections/chevy-bolt-suspension

  • DC Bruce DC Bruce on Dec 17, 2020

    This marketing exercise is truly silly. It is premised on the idea that the product being slowly "revealed" is already desirable, so the excitement builds -- e.g. the new Corvette. It's hard to see the Bolt as "desirable" in any significant way, unless you're the kind of person who gets excited about refrigerators or vacuum cleaners. The truth about any of these future "cars" is they are becoming commoditized, first in appearance (what can you do with the basic shape of an SUV to make it interesting or distinctive?) and secondly, with electrification, in driving characteristics. I occasionally watch a YouTube channel, "curious cars" which consists of 20-30 minute mini-reviews of various vintage and not so vintage cars by an interestingly dyspeptic salesman named Bill. His deal is finding these cars, cleaning them up a bit and then, in a reverse-psychology way, selling them via his reviews (he actually panned the BMW electric car, calling it a "toaster"). Anyway . . . one of his recent reviews was of a 1968 Buick Riviera, which had low mileage and was in good condition. It is a truly pretty car outside, in a way that nothing is today. The interior, as Bill noted, was showing signs of the General's de-contenting, as compared to the most desirable Rivs (1963-65). It seemed, frankly, kind of crude. But the exterior design was beautiful, unique and therefore instantly recognizable as a Riviera. Hardly a commodity . . . and it featured a 430 cubic inch V-8 rated at 360 HP. So, aurally, it had character as well.

  • Lichtronamo Watch as the non-us based automakers shift more production to Mexico in the future.
  • 28-Cars-Later " Electrek recently dug around in Tesla’s online parts catalog and found that the windshield costs a whopping $1,900 to replace.To be fair, that’s around what a Mercedes S-Class or Rivian windshield costs, but the Tesla’s glass is unique because of its shape. It’s also worth noting that most insurance plans have glass replacement options that can make the repair a low- or zero-cost issue. "Now I understand why my insurance is so high despite no claims for years and about 7,500 annual miles between three cars.
  • AMcA My theory is that that when the Big 3 gave away the store to the UAW in the last contract, there was a side deal in which the UAW promised to go after the non-organized transplant plants. Even the UAW understands that if the wage differential gets too high it's gonna kill the golden goose.
  • MKizzy Why else does range matter? Because in the EV advocate's dream scenario of a post-ICE future, the average multi-car household will find itself with more EVs in their garages and driveways than places to plug them in or the capacity to charge then all at once without significant electrical upgrades. Unless each vehicle has enough range to allow for multiple days without plugging in, fighting over charging access in multi-EV households will be right up there with finances for causes of domestic strife.
  • 28-Cars-Later WSJ blurb in Think or Swim:Workers at Volkswagen's Tennessee factory voted to join the United Auto Workers, marking a historic win for the 89- year-old union that is seeking to expand where it has struggled before, with foreign-owned factories in the South.The vote is a breakthrough for the UAW, whose membership has shrunk by about three-quarters since the 1970s, to less than 400,000 workers last year.UAW leaders have hitched their growth ambitions to organizing nonunion auto factories, many of which are in southern states where the Detroit-based labor group has failed several times and antiunion sentiment abounds."People are ready for change," said Kelcey Smith, 48, who has worked in the VW plant's paint shop for about a year, after leaving his job at an Amazon.com warehouse in town. "We look forward to making history and bringing change throughout the entire South."   ...Start the clock on a Chattanooga shutdown.
Next