Rare Rides: A Very Limited Edition 2002 Range Rover G4 Challenge (Part II)

Corey Lewis
by Corey Lewis
rare rides a very limited edition 2002 range rover g4 challenge part ii

In Part I of this very orange Rare Ride, we covered the love child of Rover, BMW, and (eventually) Ford which was the L322 Range Rover. Today we’ll talk about just what makes this one so special, aside from the glaringly orange paint.

The race known today as G4 had its roots in the early Eighties when cigarette maker Camel was the primary sponsor of the Camel Trophy off-roading challenge. In its kickoff year in 1980 teams used Jeeps, but every year after Land Rovers were used. The Camel used traditional Series Land Rovers, as well as the Defender, Discovery, and Freelander. The Camel Trophy sort of morphed as it went along through the year 2000, and in its last year had boats as its primary exploration vehicles. Land Rover felt the event was straying too far from SUV exploration and too near to lifestyle-ness and pulled its sponsorship a couple of years prior. At the end, RJ Reynolds (owner of Camel) had recently separated from Nabisco and was in the process of selling all non-US operations to Japan Tobacco circa 1999. Japan Tobacco chose to focus on its Camel Active clothing brand and did not pursue future instances of the Camel Trophy.

A couple of years later, teams from 16 different countries worked with Land Rover to reestablish a global off-road driving challenge, with Land Rover as the primary sponsor. The G4 was born and included similar events from the last time Land Rover participated in the Camel Trophy in 1998. Four different stages formed the “ultimate global adventure,” and took place in four different time zones. The inaugural event in 2003 offered as grand prize a fully-equipped Range Rover. The winner of the inaugural G4 declined the Range and said he wanted two Defenders instead. Land Rover obliged.

To participate during the 2003 G4, Land Rover prepared 31 Defenders, 30 Range Rovers, 62 Discovery IIs, and 30 Freelanders. Painted in Tangiers Orange, the Range Rovers were outfitted with a heavy-duty winch, front and rear brush guards, trailer hitches, underbody protection, rear roof access ladder, and a solid roof rack from Safety Devices. Additionally, there were extra lights on the outside for night time exploring, a roof-mounted spare wheel, and serious G4-spec Goodyear MTR tires. Fitting its mission of durable exploration, the Range Rover’s interior was outfitted in a basic dark gray and had many bits of brushed aluminum where there would normally be polished wood.

The Range Rover seen here was built for the later Australian sections of the challenge. Due to its photogenic location and the fact the Range Rover was the new hotness from Land Rover, it became the most photographed vehicle in the event. After G4, it was presented on posters and in Land Rover marketing materials and catalogs. At some point, it was sold off by Land Rover into private hands, but not before being stripped of its unique G4 parts. A longstanding tradition since the Camel Trophy, buyers of used Camel/G4 cars occupy their time with restoring their special use Land Rovers back to competition appearance at great expense. Then they never use them off-road again because they’re valuable collector’s items covered in unobtainium aftermarket parts.

The G4 Challenge persisted through 2007, at which point it became a more charity-oriented event as Land Rover linked up with the Red Cross. In the latter part of 2008, Land Rover decided to cancel the 2008-2009 scheduled events in Mongolia due to the financial crisis. The company has never reinstated the challenge.

There’s still time left to bid on today’s G4 Range Rover. As of writing it was near its reserve, and bid up to $24,654.

[Images: seller]

Join the conversation
2 of 4 comments
  • SCE to AUX Good summary, Matt.I like EVs, but not bans, subsidies, or carbon credits. Let them find their own level.PM Sunak has done a good thing, but I'm surprised at how sensibly early he made the call. Hopefully they'll ban the ban altogether.
  • SCE to AUX "Having spoken to plenty of suppliers over the years, many have told me they tried to adapt to EV production only to be confronted with inconsistent orders."Lofty sales predictions followed by reality.I once worked (very briefly) for a key supplier to Segway, back when "Ginger" was going to change the world. Many suppliers like us tooled up to support sales in the millions, only to sell thousands - and then went bankrupt.
  • SCE to AUX "all-electric vehicles, resulting in a scenario where automakers need fewer traditional suppliers"Is that really true? Fewer traditional suppliers, but they'll be replaced with other suppliers. You won't have the myriad of parts for an internal combustion engine and its accessories (exhaust, sensors), but you still have gear reducers (sometimes two or three), electric motors with lots of internal components, motor mounts, cooling systems, and switchgear.Battery packs aren't so simple, either, and the fire recalls show that quality control is paramount.The rest of the vehicle is pretty much the same - suspension, brakes, body, etc.
  • Theflyersfan As crazy as the NE/Mid-Atlantic I-95 corridor drivers can be, for the most part they pay attention and there aren't too many stupid games. I think at times it's just too crowded for that stuff. I've lived all over the US and the worst drivers are in parts of the Midwest. As I've mentioned before, Ohio drivers have ZERO lane discipline when it comes to cruising, merging, and exiting. And I've just seen it in this area (Louisville) where many drivers have literally no idea how to merge. I've never seen an area where drivers have no problems merging onto an interstate at 30 mph right in front of you. There are some gruesome wrecks at these merge points because it looks like drivers are just too timid to merge and speed up correctly. And the weaving and merging at cloverleaf exits (which in this day and age need to all go away) borders on comical in that no one has a bloody clue of let car merge in, you merge right to exit, and then someone repeats behind you. That way traffic moves. Not a chance here.And for all of the ragging LA drivers get, I found them just fine. It's actually kind of funny watching them rearrange themselves like after a NASCAR caution flag once traffic eases up and they line up, speed up to 80 mph for a few miles, only to come to a dead halt again. I think they are just so used to the mess of freeways and drivers that it's kind of a "we'll get there when we get there..." kind of attitude.
  • Analoggrotto I refuse to comment until Tassos comments.