Mercedes-Benz Abandons Manual Transmission, Sticks With Streamlining

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

As the manual transmission gradually joins the wheel-mounted throttle lever in the automotive history trash bin, we’ve been wondering which manufacture would be the next to take a bold stance against be-clutched vehicles. Today we have our answer, thanks to a tweet explaining the brand’s research boss had indicated Mercedes-Benz doesn’t have room for manuals in its current restructuring program.

“The head of @MercedesBenz’s R&D operations, Markus Schaefer, has confirmed the company will ‘eliminate manual transmissions’ as part of cost-cutting initiatives that will also see a ‘substantial reduction in platforms’ and a ‘very dramatic reduction in combustion engines,'” automotive journalist Greg Kable explained via social media on Tuesday.

Considering yours truly hasn’t seen a manual Mercedes in the wild manufactured after 2002, this news probably isn’t knocking anyone out of their chair. In fact, the company hasn’t been selling manual optioned cars in the United States for several years.

Trying to consolidate models onto fewer platforms isn’t much of a shocker either. Mercedes-Benz actually opened the year by stating that it would be reducing the number of cars, engines, and platforms available to customers to ensure it had enough money to transition into an electric automotive brand. “We are reviewing our product portfolio, especially as we announced so many pure EVs,” Schafer said in March. “Knowing the complexity after the growth in the last couple of years means we are definitely reviewing our current lineup. The idea is to streamline — taking car variants out, but also platforms, powertrains, and components.”

Schafer said that, while Daimler’s plan was not to eliminate V8 and V12 engines from the Mercedes lineup, the company would ultimately have to utilize four-cylinder engines at a much higher frequency — especially if its ultimate goal is to prioritize EV sales moving forward. Meanwhile, the number of platforms the company uses should shrink immensely, leaving a few bases upon which to build the majority of its vehicles from. While this will undoubtedly save the brand a mint that can be reinvested into costly EV development, it kind of makes it sound like the next generation of internal combustion cars are going to be virtually identical to each other with tepid powertrain and sizing options being the only items setting them apart.

[Image: Franz12/Shutterstock]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 27 comments
  • Namesakeone Namesakeone on Oct 07, 2020

    Nobody wants three pedals, everybody wants three rows.

  • Jerome10 Jerome10 on Oct 07, 2020

    Did Mercedes even sell sticks anytime recently in the USA? I’m telling you this rush to EVs and 4 cylinders is going to leave a trail of destruction. The EU can mandate whatever they want (they’re good at that). Then when lots of damage is done they’ll have a shocking revelation that you can’t make people desire or buy things they don’t want and change course. After billions thrown into the furnace and probably a few auto companies going out of business. The other danger is that if you’ve got 4 cylinder hybrids.... so does everyone else. What special reason do I have to buy a Mercedes at this point? The Ford 4 cylinder hybrid system is probably just as good or better than Mercedes. Smoother. Lasts longer. Better MPG. Part of what makes something luxurious is that it has features not available in pleb models. Am I supposed to believe some higher resolution iPads and some fancy inside lighting and a Star on the hood are enough of a luxury differentiator to pay 50% more? To be clear this is not a problem exclusive to Mercedes. BMW has also nearly lost all of the magical things that built its brand. You can ride your image for awhile but eventually people ask “why am I buying this again? What is so special about this that makes it worth this price?” (See Cadillac starting in the 1980s).

    • Old_WRX Old_WRX on Oct 07, 2020

      "Star on the hood are enough of a luxury differentiator to pay 50% more?" I think they are still riding off the long gone quality they had back in the day of things like the 280SE, 240D and such. Those older MB were built really well, but that's long past. You forgot to mention the perfume dispenser thing on upscale MB's. No need to hang that Christmas tree from the rear view mirror. Now isn't that worth shelling out for?

  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh haaaaaaaaaaahahahahahahahaha
  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh *Why would anyone buy this* when the 2025 RamCharger is right around the corner, *faster* with vastly *better mpg* and stupid amounts of torque using a proven engine layout and motivation drive in use since 1920.
  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh I hate this soooooooo much. but the 2025 RAMCHARGER is the CORRECT bridge for people to go electric. I hate dodge (thanks for making me buy 2 replacement 46RH's) .. but the ramcharger's electric drive layout is *vastly* superior to a full electric car in dense populous areas where charging is difficult and where moron luddite science hating trumpers sabotage charges or block them.If Toyota had a tundra in the same config i'd plop 75k cash down today and burn my pos chevy in the dealer parking lot
  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh I own my house 100% paid for at age 52. the answer is still NO.-28k (realistically) would take 8 years to offset my gas truck even with its constant repair bills (thanks chevy)-Still takes too long to charge UNTIL solidsate batteries are a thing and 80% in 15 minutes becomes a reality (for ME anyways, i get others are willing to wait)For the rest of the market, especially people in dense cityscape, apartments dens rentals it just isnt feasible yet IMO.
  • ToolGuy I do like the fuel economy of a 6-cylinder engine. 😉
Next