Upstart Lucid Banks on Big Numbers, Not Bodystyle

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

There’s no shortage of fledgling electric automakers peddling their future wares, so how does an embryonic car company avoid becoming just a face in the crowd? If you’re Lucid Motors, you aim for big numbers. The kind that matter to motoring enthusiasts, not environmentalists.

With its first model, the Air, Lucid plans to wow would-be buyers not just with an impressive driving range, but also power and acceleration specs. Those early numbers arrived today, one week ahead of the production model’s public debut.

Feel like running the quarter mile in fewer than 10 seconds? Lucid claims that, in top-flight guise, the Air can do just that. In dual-motor, all-wheel drive spec, the sedan is said to be “able to achieve quarter-mile times as low as 9.9 seconds on a consistent, repeatable


basis.”

To put that number in some sort of context, Dodge claims the 2021 Charger SRT Hellcat Redeye, maker of 797 horsepower, can do it in 10.6 seconds. Eye-popping quickness for sure, though the eco crowd might look down on such an outlandish display of muscle flexing as needlessly wasted electrons. Battery capacity and electricity generation isn’t without its own upstream environmental impacts.

Yet Lucid seems to know what an Air customer looks like, and what these consumers care about. While lesser Airs made to with a single motor, even that model isn’t a slough. The automaker revealed its in-house drivetrain today, making quite a fuss over the potency and compactness of the proprietary units. Combining permanent magnet motor, inverter, and transmission, the drive units are said to weight just 163 pounds. Output for one unit can be as high as 670 hp.

In dual-motor guise, the pinnacle Air makes 1,080 ponies, fueled by a huge — and apparently quite energy dense — 113 kWh battery pack. A 900V electrical architecture enables the car to take on 300 miles of range in 20 minutes, assuming one can find an ultra-fast charging station. And as we told you already, a third-party testing outfit pegged the leggiest Air at 517 miles of EPA-estimated range.

To recap: huge power, boffo range, and speed to spare. Seems like a recipe tailor-made to attract those who wouldn’t otherwise find themselves drawn to an electric car. Someone who gets a kick out of bragging rights and showing off, even if it means forking over big dollars. As Lucid has no intention of knocking Nissan off its green people’s car pedestal, this all sounds like the automaker will instead fill a specific niche in the emissions-free ecosystem.

The automaker admits as much.

In an interview with Autoblog, Emad Dlala, a technology fellow at Lucid, weighed in on the company’s decision to launch the brand with a sedan, rather than a truck or SUV like rival Rivian.

“Even if we take a small percentage of that luxury segment, we’re going to be fine. We’re not going to see a shortage of orders,” Dlala said. “Another thing is, as a startup, you can go with the best product in terms of how desirable it is, but even if the specs are OK, you are probably not going to succeed as well as with a car with sensational specs, even if demand is not as high. That’s what we think the sedan will lead us to: much better specifications.”

The Air’s long road to readiness ends Sept. 9, when buyers can finally take a look at the production-ready product slated to arrive in driveways (via an Arizona assembly plant) in 2021.

[Images: Lucid Motors]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
5 of 11 comments
  • Aja8888 Aja8888 on Sep 02, 2020

    Guy's don't wait up at night expecting ICE cars to be gone like the dinosaurs anytime soon. EV's are just too expensive and the batteries are the weak spot, from a safety, range and material availability standpoint. Don't forget that probably 90% of ICE car drivers are low level wage earners with probably a wife and two kids to support. They are buying the "sedans" and small "crossovers" that the Big Guns put out by the MILLIONS. This is worldwide, BTW. I suspect those 90% of ICE buyers may wander into the EV market when a used one can be had for $10 -12 grand. And that may be a long while from now, given the small market share EV's have.

    • See 2 previous
    • RHD RHD on Sep 07, 2020

      A Honda Civic hybrid battery costs about $2000, including installation. Claims of $5000+ are inaccurate and misleading. The hyperbole about how expensive electric cars are to replace batteries in is right-wing nonsense. Next year I'm installing solar panels, and I would consider adding an electric car to the fleet. Just not paying $50 or more to fill up would fill pretty good. The quietness of an EV has to be experienced to be appreciated, and the acceleration will open your eyes.

  • ToolGuy ToolGuy on Sep 02, 2020

    "Combining permanent magnet motor, inverter, and transmission, the drive units are said to weight just 163 pounds." This would look amazing in the engine bay of my GMT400 pickup about 6 years from now. (Let me know if you total your Lucid Air and would like to sell the drive unit.) [I will also be on the lookout for some next-gen batteries. Replacing the weight of the current engine and transmission with this drive unit and some nice batteries half a decade from now would make for an exceptionally clean installation (can keep my current flatbed height). Don't need a lot of range for this vehicle, but might end up with plenty by then.]

  • ToolGuy The other day I attempted to check the engine oil in one of my old embarrassing vehicles and I guess the red shop towel I used wasn't genuine Snap-on (lots of counterfeits floating around) plus my driveway isn't completely level and long story short, the engine seized 3 minutes later.No more used cars for me, and nothing but dealer service from here on in (the journalists were right).
  • Doughboy Wow, Merc knocks it out of the park with their naming convention… again. /s
  • Doughboy I’ve seen car bras before, but never car beards. ZZ Top would be proud.
  • Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.
  • Lou_BC "That’s expensive for a midsize pickup" All of the "offroad" midsize trucks fall in that 65k USD range. The ZR2 is probably the cheapest ( without Bison option).
Next