2020 Toyota Highlander Platinum V6 AWD Review - Victim of Timing

Tim Healey
by Tim Healey
Fast Facts

2020 Toyota Highlander Platinum V6 AWD Fast Facts

3.5-liter V6 (295 hp @ 6,600 rpm, 263 lb-ft @ 4,700 rpm)
Eight-speed automatic, all-wheel drive
20 city / 27 highway / 23 combined (EPA Estimated Rating, MPG)
11.7 city, 8.6 highway, 10.3 combined (NRCan Rating, L/100km)
Base Price
$48,800 (U.S) / $54,150(Canada)
As Tested
$51,112 (U.S.) / $56,905 (Canada)
Prices include $1,120 destination charge in the United States and $1,940 for freight, PDI, and A/C tax in Canada and, because of cross-border equipment differences, can't be directly compared. The V6 must be special ordered in Canada, so consumer pri

The 2020 Toyota Highlander is a pretty good improvement over the previous generation, building off an already strong foundation, but unfortunately for Toyota, it comes along just as Kia’s Telluride and Hyundai’s Palisade soar towards class dominance.

Ask anyone who made big plans for after March 1, 2020, and they’ll tell you – timing is everything.

In Toyota’s case, a very, very good three-row family hauler is getting lost in all the hype about the two outstanding Korean entries.

Somewhere, a Toyota sales manager sobs in his coffee in between Zooms.

Understandably so, because the Highlander is dang good at achieving its mission – hauling your minions/stuff/pets/whatever across town in relative comfort, without being a chore to drive.

The Highlander is not a joy to drive – it can feel heavy, ponderous, and slow at times, despite 295 and 263 lb-ft of torque being on tap from the 3.5-liter V6. Handling is deliberate. The ride, however, is nice and comfortable. An eight-speed automatic transmission gets the power down to the all-wheel-drive system.

Still, the driving dynamics aren’t so far off what the Kia/Hyundai twins offer that it’s completely out of range. And most buyers in this class don’t care all that much about on-road dynamics, anyway. Competence is often good enough.

And the Highlander is more than competent in the areas that matter. The interior looked and felt fairly upscale, and creature comforts weren’t lacking. The cabin design isn’t as handsome as that of the Hyundai and Kia, and it’s a bit of a mish-mash of shapes, but as noted before, the materials look and feel nice enough to make up for any stylistic weirdness. And there’s enough utility in terms of cupholders and cubby holes and storage areas to help out any harried parent.

Even the infotainment screen is better integrated than on many Toyota products, though the brand’s graphics still rival Honda for being the most far behind the times.

Shortly after I drove the gasser Highlander, I marched west an hour to drive the hybrid version of the Highlander on the suburban streets around Toyota’s Chicago-area regional offices. I guess when it comes to this Highlander, there can be more than one.

Not shockingly, the Hybrid is slightly less engaging on-road, in service of fuel economy, but the overall package doesn’t feel too different. You do give up power – the 2.5-liter four-cylinder has 186 system horsepower and 175 lb-ft of torque. You also trade an eight-speed automatic transmission for a CVT.

The exterior design combines slab siding with curved fenders and a sloping roofline with a front face that is more than a tad angry-looking. Thank the slanted headlamps, along with a chrome strip that includes the Toyota badge, for that. The fog-lamp openings also contribute to the Highlander’s perpetually pissed-off face.

It’s an aggressive look that belies the crossover’s mission as a comfortable family hauler. It’s not a bad look, but it feels unnecessary, as well as incongruent with the softer styling from the A-pillar rearward. Who asked for this – dads who want to show that they can still be hardcore with a baby seat in the back?

The features list, especially on the Platinum trim I drove, was class-competitive. There wasn’t much in the way of options – just the paint color ($425), carpeted floor mats and cargo mat ($318), a tablet holder ($99), and crossbars for the cargo area ($350).

Standard features included Toyota’s SafetySense suite of driver’s-aid tech: Pre-collision system w/pedestrian detection, dynamic radar cruise control, lane-departure alert with steering assist, lane-tracing assist, automatic high beams, and road-sign assist. Other standard features included blind-spot monitoring with rear cross-traffic alert, front and rear parking assist with automatic braking, 360-degree camera, 20-inch wheels, LED headlamps, adaptive front lighting, LED fog lights, hands-free power liftgate, panoramic moonroof, rain-sensing wipers, heated and cooled front seats, leather seats, heated second-row seats, 60/40 spilt-fold/fold-flat third-row seats, 12.3-inch touchscreen infotainment, navigation, satellite radio, premium audio with subwoofer, USB media port, four USB charge ports, Android Auto and Apple CarPlay, wireless smart-phone charger, and a rearview mirror that includes HomeLink.

That all added up to $48,800. With the options and the $1,120 destination fee, the sticker was $51,112. That $48,800 base price is a few grand more than a Telluride SX bases for, but clicking lots of options boxes on the Kia puts it on par with the as-tested price.

However, a Telluride spec’d close to this Highlander undercut it by several thousand dollars.

The Highlander is a pretty damn good three-row crossover, with nice interior materials. It’s not as strong all-around as the Palisade or Telluride, mainly because it’s not quite as attractive, inside or out, and it’s not quite as engaging on-road. But it’s nicer than Ford’s Explorer, which can get costly, and feels a bit upmarket compared to Volkswagen’s Atlas (which scores well on utility, if not aesthetics).

There’s a reason the Telluride and Palisade are kicking butt, but if they don’t ring your bell, the Highlander works well.

Maybe that will make our hypothetical sobbing Toyota exec feel better.

[Images © 2020 Tim Healey/TTAC]

Tim Healey
Tim Healey

Tim Healey grew up around the auto-parts business and has always had a love for cars — his parents joke his first word was “‘Vette”. Despite this, he wanted to pursue a career in sports writing but he ended up falling semi-accidentally into the automotive-journalism industry, first at Consumer Guide Automotive and later at Web2Carz.com. He also worked as an industry analyst at Mintel Group and freelanced for About.com, CarFax, Vehix.com, High Gear Media, Torque News, FutureCar.com, Cars.com, among others, and of course Vertical Scope sites such as AutoGuide.com, Off-Road.com, and HybridCars.com. He’s an urbanite and as such, doesn’t need a daily driver, but if he had one, it would be compact, sporty, and have a manual transmission.

More by Tim Healey

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 78 comments
  • SuperCarEnthusiast SuperCarEnthusiast on Sep 30, 2020

    What the new Highlander needs is a V8! Maybe tune to 400 hp and 400 lbs. torque!

  • Petey Petey on Oct 15, 2020

    Is it just me or is the 3.5L motor getting long in the tooth.... Come on Toyota, Your competitors are offering V8's, and turbos, even twin turbos in their family sleds. If your going to charge 55K canadian, I would demand more then a na V6.

  • HotRod Not me personally, but yes - lower prices will dramatically increase the EV's appeal.
  • Slavuta "the price isn’t terrible by current EV standards, starting at $47,200"Not terrible for a new Toyota model. But for a Vietnamese no-name, this is terrible.
  • Slavuta This is catch22 for me. I would take RAV4 for the powertrain alone. And I wouldn't take it for the same thing. Engines have history of issues and transmission shifts like glass. So, the advantage over hard-working 1.5 is lost.My answer is simple - CX5. This is Japan built, excellent car which has only one shortage - the trunk space.
  • Slavuta "Toyota engineers have told us that they intentionally build their powertrains with longevity in mind"Engine is exactly the area where Toyota 4cyl engines had big issues even recently. There was no longevity of any kind. They didn't break, they just consumed so much oil that it was like fueling gasoline and feeding oil every time
  • Wjtinfwb Very fortunate so far; the fleet ranges from 2002 to 2023, the most expensive car to maintain we have is our 2020 Acura MDX. One significant issue was taken care of under warranty, otherwise, 6 oil changes at the Acura dealer at $89.95 for full-synthetic and a new set of Michelin Defenders and 4-wheel alignment for 1300. No complaints. a '16 Subaru Crosstrek and '16 Focus ST have each required a new battery, the Ford's was covered under warranty, Subaru's was just under $200. 2 sets of tires on the Focus, 1 set on the Subie. That's it. The Focus has 80k on it and gets synthetic ever 5k at about $90, the Crosstrek is almost identical except I'll run it to 7500 since it's not turbocharged. My '02 V10 Excursion gets one oil change a year, I do it myself for about $30 bucks with Synthetic oil and Motorcraft filter from Wal-Mart for less than $40 bucks. Otherwise it asks for nothing and never has. My new Bronco is still under warranty and has no issues. The local Ford dealer sucks so I do it myself. 6 qts. of full syn, a Motorcraft cartridge filter from Amazon. Total cost about $55 bucks. Takes me 45 minutes. All in I spend about $400/yr. maintaining cars not including tires. The Excursion will likely need some front end work this year, I've set aside a thousand bucks for that. A lot less expensive than when our fleet was smaller but all German.
Next