With Range Comes Dominance? Daimler Strengthens Relationship With Chinese Battery Maker CATL

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

With practically every automaker on the planet attempting to make the electric vehicle segment work for them as well as Tesla has, they’re stepping all over each other to gain access to the components necessary to build them.

Everything from securing the raw materials for high-density cells to improving relationships with established battery suppliers will be essential for maximizing market share and embarrassing industry rivals like the little bitches they (hopefully) are. This has been especially true of German brands, who are trying to roll with increasingly demanding emission rules in Europe and China while likewise hoping to improve all-electric range and lower EV production costs.

Daimler, which already has supply deals with SK Innovation, LG Chem and Farasis, is seeking to bolster its partnership with China’s Contemporary Amperex Technology Ltd. (CATL) to address some of the challenges listed above. Mercedes-Benz wants to launch its EQS luxury electric sedan using CATL cells in 2021 — ideally with at least 435 miles of range per charge. While Daimler uses Worldwide Harmonized Light Vehicle Test Procedure (WLTP) metrics that typically average lower when assessed by the U.S. regulators, the proposed target remains enviable.

“We intend to lead in battery technologies, so we are now combining our own research and development expertise with bold partners. We will integrate cutting-edge battery systems to create luxury cars with outstanding range, charging speed, safety and sustainability. Working with CATL will see us accelerate our transformation towards carbon-neutrality,” Markus Schäfer, Mercedes-Benz Cars COO and Daimler board member, explained.

“CATL will be a major supplier securing capacity for the next generations of our EQ products in the years to come.”

As per Wednesday’s announcement, the updated CATL partnership will include supplying cells and entire battery systems in exchange for Daimler sharing its own R&D. That also means MB Cars and MB Vans will get the same cell-to-pack (CTP) design Tesla now has in Asia. If executed correctly, vehicles using the system are supposed to yield higher energy densities and swifter charging times. CTP is likewise supposed to help tamp down production costs immensely. That said, these benefits are currently speculative in nature, even if they do seem to hold immense promise for EV adoption rates.

Vying to someday be carbon neutral, Daimler suggested that CATL battery production will be dependent upon renewable energy sources, noting that the company will build a new facility near Erfurt, Germany, to supply Mercedes.

CATL already intends to start production there by the end of 2020. While the pandemic has created some setbacks at the site, it’s supposed to be mostly on track to begin deliveries to European partners soon — including BMW Group, Daimler, Renault, Volkswagen Group, and Volvo.

[Image: Franz12/Shutterstock]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 20 comments
  • Inside Looking Out Inside Looking Out on Aug 05, 2020

    " in exchange for Daimler sharing its own R&D" That's how China Inc. functions. They force you to "share" your know how and then force you into a bankruptcy.

  • Redapple Redapple on Aug 06, 2020

    I had a 2000 Explorer. New. I called it the drifting, plodding, pounding pile of sheet. I ve captained sail boats with better steering. (EX. 2005 Jeanneau 45 ') Headlight died. Had to drop the fascia to change out the bulb. My last FORD. Bye.

  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh I'd rather they have the old sweep gauges, the hhuuggee left to right speedometer from the 40's and 50's where the needle went from lefty to right like in my 1969 Nova
  • Buickman I like it!
  • JMII Hyundai Santa Cruz, which doesn't do "truck" things as well as the Maverick does.How so? I see this repeated often with no reference to exactly what it does better.As a Santa Cruz owner the only things the Mav does better is price on lower trims and fuel economy with the hybrid. The Mav's bed is a bit bigger but only when the SC has the roll-top bed cover, without this they are the same size. The Mav has an off road package and a towing package the SC lacks but these are just some parts differences. And even with the tow package the Hyundai is rated to tow 1,000lbs more then the Ford. The SC now has XRT trim that beefs up the looks if your into the off-roader vibe. As both vehicles are soft-roaders neither are rock crawling just because of some extra bits Ford tacked on.I'm still loving my SC (at 9k in mileage). I don't see any advantages to the Ford when you are looking at the medium to top end trims of both vehicles. If you want to save money and gas then the Ford becomes the right choice. You will get a cheaper interior but many are fine with this, especially if don't like the all touch controls on the SC. However this has been changed in the '25 models in which buttons and knobs have returned.
  • Analoggrotto I'd feel proper silly staring at an LCD pretending to be real gauges.
  • Gray gm should hang their wimpy logo on a strip mall next to Saul Goodman's office.
Next