Report: Nissan-Honda Tie-up Didn't Makes It to the First Date

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Romance was not in the air when Japanese officials attempted to spark a merger between troubled automaker Nissan and its far healthier rival, Honda, a report in the Financial Times claims.

According to three sources, the effort to bring both automakers to the table — a high-level decision apparently originating in the Japanese Prime Minister’s office — went nowhere. Can anyone imagine a reason why Honda would turn up its nose at such an idea?

The attempt to bring both sides to the table for merger talks reportedly occurred at the end of last year, as Nissan floundered amid financial distress born of falling global sales and brash past decisions. The pandemic that came along early this year didn’t help things and effectively buried the idea. The thinking in Shinzo Abe’s office was that the bad blood between Nissan and alliance partner Renault could lead to a split — a danger that risked leaving “the Japanese company exposed.”

Who better to partner with than unencumbered auto giant Honda? Toyota, it seemed, had too many smaller tie-ups on the go already.

Indeed, FT claims the close relationship between Nissan and Renault and the capital structure they both share was a factor in the idea not getting off the ground. Renault owns a 43.4-percent stake in Nissan, with Nissan holding a 15-percent stake in the former company. As well, the French government holds a 15-percent stake in Renault.

It’s reported that the effort to merge didn’t even make it to the boards of either automaker, with Honda rejecting the idea outright. Nissan preferred to move forward with its own attempts to right the ship and repair the alliance.

In May, the automaker released a four-year plan aimed at solidifying Nissan’s fiscal foundation. The plan would see the automaker shrink in global reach and output; alliance partners Renault and Mitsubishi would also tame their ambitions, focusing instead on the markets and products that show the most promise.

As for the kiboshed merger talks, parts and platform compatibility between Honda and Nissan products would have proven another sticking point.

One former Nissan executive told FT, “A Nissan-Honda merger would only make sense to people who do not understand the car industry.”

[Image: Nissan]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 14 comments
  • Schmitt trigger Schmitt trigger on Aug 17, 2020

    The way things are going with Nissan, the only suitors could well be Gaijin companies. Hyundai would symbolize how far ahead a former Japanese imperial colony has leaped forward.

    • Aquaticko Aquaticko on Aug 17, 2020

      Would make some sense, as the Japanese market remains large and Hyundai has no presence of any kind in it, but it is a shrinking market, and other than that, I don't know what Nissan has to offer Hyundai. Same thing with Mitsubishi.

  • FreedMike FreedMike on Aug 17, 2020

    My first thought is that a Chinese company would be the ideal candidate to link up with Nissan, but I don't think the Japanese government would ever let that happen.

  • Funky D The problem is not exclusively the cost of the vehicle. The problem is that there are too few use cases for BEVs that couldn't be done by a plug-in hybrid, with the latter having the ability to do long-range trips without requiring lengthy recharging and being better able to function in really cold climates.In our particular case, a plug-in hybrid would run in all electric mode for the vast majority of the miles we would drive on a regular basis. It would also charge faster and the battery replacement should be less expensive than its BEV counterpart.So the answer for me is a polite, but firm NO.
  • 3SpeedAutomatic 2012 Ford Escape V6 FWD at 147k miles:Just went thru a heavy maintenance cycle: full brake job with rotors and drums, replace top & bottom radiator hoses, radiator flush, transmission flush, replace valve cover gaskets (still leaks oil, but not as bad as before), & fan belt. Also, #4 fuel injector locked up. About $4.5k spread over 19 months. Sole means of transportation, so don't mind spending the money for reliability. Was going to replace prior to the above maintenance cycle, but COVID screwed up the market ( $4k markup over sticker including $400 for nitrogen in the tires), so bit the bullet. Now serious about replacing, but waiting for used and/or new car prices to fall a bit more. Have my eye on a particular SUV. Last I checked, had a $2.5k discount with great interest rate (better than my CU) for financing. Will keep on driving Escape as long as A/C works. 🚗🚗🚗
  • Rna65689660 For such a flat surface, why not get smoke tint, Rtint or Rvynil. Starts at $8. I used to use a company called Lamin-x, but I think they are gone. Has held up great.
  • Cprescott A cheaper golf cart will not make me more inclined to screw up my life. I can go 500 plus miles on a tank of gas with my 2016 ICE car that is paid off. I get two weeks out of a tank that takes from start to finish less than 10 minutes to refill. At no point with golf cart technology as we know it can they match what my ICE vehicle can do. Hell no. Absolutely never.
  • Cprescott People do silly things to their cars.
Next