Fiat Chrysler to Judge: GM's Being Paranoid, Please Ignore

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

General Motors desperately wants to reopen a case dismissed last month by a federal judge, but Fiat Chrysler’s having none of it.

The racketeering lawsuit filed by GM against its crosstown rival alleged that FCA secured unfair labor advantages over GM via bribed UAW officials, with the automaker claiming last week that it possesses new evidence capable of convicting its automotive foe. A number of offshore bank accounts fueled the bribery effort, GM claims, with the automaker’s court filing accusing former UAW Vice President (and ex-GM board member) Joe Ashton of being a paid mole.

Gripping stuff, but FCA says it’s seen this movie before — and it’s a stinker.

According to Reuters, FCA has requested U.S. District Judge Paul Borman to pay no attention to GM’s request, saying its rival’s allegations amount to a “third-rate spy movie, full of preposterous allegations.”

The conviction of Ashton and imprisonment of former FCA labor negotiator Alphons Iacobelli, as well as the sweeping federal investigation into corruption and bribery at the highest levels of the UAW gives GM’s lawsuit weight, but the automaker won’t be able to prove anything unless it gets its day in court. Former UAW president Dennis Williams is also named in the suit as a beneficiary of FCA’s alleged bribery scheme.

GM has claimed since the outset that corrupted bargaining practices left FCA with an unfair labor cost advantage over its domestic rivals, costing its own operations billions. It wanted to collect, and still does.

In a court filing early last week, GM claimed that FCA’s bribery cash flowed by way of bank accounts in the Cayman Islands, Switzerland, Luxembourg, Liechtenstein, Italy, and Singapore. FCA says it’s all bunk, stating to the judge that it operates facilities in dozens of countries. As such, the number of offshore accounts is “unremarkable, and certainly not illegal.”

Continuing, FCA said the naming of FCA officials was a “despicable” act reminiscent of the McCarthy witch hunt of the 1950s.

In a letter seen by Reuters on Monday, FCA CEO Mike Manley told employees that GM’s efforts amount to a case of sour grapes.

“It is… clear to me that this series of attacks is directly related to our success in competing and winning where it matters, in the market,” Manley wrote. “The consistent strengths we’ve demonstrated over the last decade will be deployed to even greater effect as we complete our merger with Groupe PSA.”

Unswayed by FCA’s new filing, GM remained adamant that it would reveal “the full extent of harm the FCA bribery scheme caused GM,” stating that, “FCA’s corruption of the collective bargaining process remains undeniable.”

[Image: Daniel J. Macy/Shutterstock]
Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 7 comments
  • Vulpine Vulpine on Aug 11, 2020

    GM has bankrupted itself once already in this century; pursuing this now will only lead to another far sooner than necessary.

  • SCE to AUX SCE to AUX on Aug 11, 2020

    Maybe the UAW should simply negotiate the same payscales for all workers, regardless of employer. Then the mfrs can treat the UAW as a labor pool from which to draw.

    • Vulpine Vulpine on Aug 11, 2020

      @SCE to AUX: That actually makes sense. But then you'd see the OEMs complaining about industrial espionage when an employee gets laid off from one and hired at another, right after which the second OEM adopts a product type or technique that was recent IP for the first. They never will get along.

  • Analoggrotto Does anyone seriously listen to this?
  • Thomas Same here....but keep in mind that EVs are already much more efficient than ICE vehicles. They need to catch up in all the other areas you mentioned.
  • Analoggrotto It's great to see TTAC kicking up the best for their #1 corporate sponsor. Keep up the good work guys.
  • John66ny Title about self driving cars, linked podcast about headlight restoration. Some relationship?
  • Jeff JMII--If I did not get my Maverick my next choice was a Santa Cruz. They are different but then they are both compact pickups the only real compact pickups on the market. I am glad to hear that the Santa Cruz will have knobs and buttons on it for 2025 it would be good if they offered a hybrid as well. When I looked at both trucks it was less about brand loyalty and more about price, size, and features. I have owned 2 gm made trucks in the past and liked both but gm does not make a true compact truck and neither does Ram, Toyota, or Nissan. The Maverick was the only Ford product that I wanted. If I wanted a larger truck I would have kept either my 99 S-10 extended cab with a 2.2 I-4 5 speed or my 08 Isuzu I-370 4 x 4 with the 3.7 I-5, tow package, heated leather seats, and other niceties and it road like a luxury vehicle. I believe the demand is there for other manufacturers to make compact pickups. The proposed hybrid Toyota Stout would be a great truck. Subaru has experience making small trucks and they could make a very competitive compact truck and Subaru has a great all wheel drive system. Chevy has a great compact pickup offered in South America called the Montana which gm could make in North America and offered in the US and Canada. Ram has a great little compact truck offered in South America as well. Compact trucks are a great vehicle for those who want an open bed for hauling but what a smaller more affordable efficient practical vehicle.
Next