Rare Rides: The 1986 Pontiac Grand Prix 2+2, Not Actually Named Aerocoupe

by Corey Lewis

Published: June 29th, 2020

rare rides the 1986 pontiac grand prix 2 2 not actually named aerocoupe

Rare Rides previously examined a rare Grand Prix. It was from a Pepsi contest and separated from the coupe you see here by only three years. Today we consider the end of an era for Grand Prix, with the very special 2+2.

Pontiac’s full-size V8 Grand Prix coupe debuted for the 1962 model year as replacement for the Ventura. The Grand Prix was more about performance than Ventura, as that name transitioned to become a luxurious trim of the Catalina. By the second-generation Grand Prix, the model shrunk into a midsize offering, but kept the sportiness Pontiac customers desired.

The successful formula remained the same through the third generation cars, but downsizing occurred for the debut of the fourth-gen model in 1978. The boxier and more contemporary looking fourth Grand Prix was a foot shorter than its predecessor, and lost 600 pounds of heft. Another sign of the times (and fuel economy regulation), Grand Prix customers had to pay extra for a V8 engine. Standard from 1978 onward was V6 power sourced from Buick, in 3.8- or 4.1-liter varieties.V8 options started at 4.3 liters with a Pontiac-developed unit, and ranged to 5.0-liters in the 305 Chevrolet V8. There was also a 5.7-liter diesel option should a customer want to pair an awful diesel experience with their downsized coupe. The vast majority of Grand Prix in this generation gained momentum by the grace of a three-speed automatic. More on that caveat later.

As its sales success continued, evolutionary trim changes appeared. Originally designated as an A-body car, GM created a new front-drive A-body line for 1982, and the rear-drive A-body cars were called G-body instead. And in 1986, there was a bit of a shakeup.

The tail lamps changed in design, featuring three different sections! And less impressively, there was a new body style on offer: the 2+2. This new greenhouse-inspired coupe was paired with the similar Monte Carlo SS 2+2 for a single model year. A homologation effort, General Motors needed to make some production cars in order to use its new aerodynamic two-door body in NASCAR.Notable changes over standard Grand Prix included the large, fixed rear glass arrangement and shortened trunk lid (made of fiberglass), along with an integrated ducktail spoiler. At the front, a pointy aerodynamic nose replaced the boxy standard front clip. All examples came painted in the same two-tone grey scheme, with 2+2 signage here and there. Other standard 2+2 features included 5.0-liter V8 power, plus a transmission upgrade in the form of a four-speed 200-4R. All used the same Rally II wheels.

It should be noted that the “Aerocoupe” name was an affectation by the public, as the official name of the car was Grand Prix 2+2. Given its special limited-production nature, dealers added a considerable 20 percent markup to the cars. In total, 1,118 were made, and all of them went to Southeastern region Pontiac dealers. The Grand Prix remained unchanged for its final model year in 1987, as the rear-drive coupe headed into the sunset. Its replacement in ’88 was much more with the times: front-drive, powered only by V6 engines, and available with four doors.Today’s Rare Ride has just under 29,000 miles, and in its pristine condition asks $18,900.[Images: seller]

#1980s #AmericanCars #ClassicCars #CollectorCars #Coupes #FamilyCars #GeneralMotors #GM #GrandPrix #GrandPrixAerocoupe #UsedCars #Pontiac #PontiacGrandPrix #NewsBlog #MidsizeCars #RareRides

Corey Lewis

Interested in lots of cars and their various historical contexts. Started writing articles for TTAC in late 2016, when my first posts were QOTDs. From there I started a few new series like Rare Rides, Buy/Drive/Burn, Abandoned History, and most recently Rare Rides Icons. Operating from a home base in Cincinnati, Ohio, a relative auto journalist dead zone. Many of my articles are prompted by something I'll see on social media that sparks my interest and causes me to research. Finding articles and information from the early days of the internet and beyond that covers the little details lost to time: trim packages, color and wheel choices, interior fabrics. Beyond those, I'm fascinated by automotive industry experiments, both failures and successes. Lately I've taken an interest in AI, and generating "what if" type images for car models long dead. Reincarnating a modern Toyota Paseo, Lincoln Mark IX, or Isuzu Trooper through a text prompt is fun. Fun to post them on Twitter too, and watch people overreact. To that end, the social media I use most is Twitter, @CoreyLewis86. I also contribute pieces for Forbes Wheels and Forbes Home.

More by Corey Lewis

Comments

Join the conversation

6 of 34 comments

PrincipalDan on Jun 29, 2020

yup... Fuel Injection does not get the credit it deserves in many circles for being such a wonderful leap forward. In my fantasy world my 1987 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme with Olds 307 would have had TBI. I don't even care if it would have increased the horsepower/torque. The drive-ability benefits would have been amazing.

Like Reply
Art Vandelay on Jun 30, 2020

This car wasn't built to sell in any numbers...it was built because the aerodynamic Ford Thunderbird was kicking GM's butt on NASCAR's big tracks. That's all.

Like Reply
- See 3 previous
- MRF 95 T-Bird on Jun 30, 2020
  
  A suggestion for Buy, Drive, Burn- Fox body Thunderbird, Cougar vs GM G-body coupes.
  
  Like
- Art Vandelay on Jun 30, 2020
  
  @MRF 95 T-Bird Buy - 87-88 Cougar XR-7 with 5.0 Drive - 88 Thunderbird Turbo Coupe with Manual and SVO type magnetic suspension (Think the 88 had the most power, but any past 85 will really do) burn - all of the G bodies.
  
  Like
- MRF 95 T-Bird on Jul 01, 2020
  
  @Art Vandelay I owned an 87 Thunderbird with the 3.8 Essex TBI, the 88 got the MPI that gave it a few more ponies. One of the best vehicles I’ve ever owned. The 87-88 Turbo coupe had the inter cooler with the air slots in the hood giving it around 40 more horsepower. The SVO Mustang had the hood scoop.
  
  Like
- Steve on Jul 07, 2020
  
  @Art Vandelay Art - I got an 87 Buick G-Body that says different. It came in one color...Black.
  
  Like

Recent Comments

Sobhuza Trooper That Dave Thomas fella sounds like the kind of twit who is oh-so-quick to tell us how easy and fun the bus is for any and all of your personal transportation needs. The time to get to and from the bus stop is never a concern. The time waiting for the bus is never a concern. The time waiting for a connection (if there is one) is never a concern. The weather is never a concern. Whatever you might be carrying or intend to purchase is never a concern. Nope, Boo Cars! Yeah Buses! Buses rule!Needless to say, these twits don't actual take the damn bus.
MaintenanceCosts Nobody here seems to acknowledge that there are multiple use cases for cars.Some people spend all their time driving all over the country and need every mile and minute of time savings. ICE cars are better for them right now.Some people only drive locally and fly when they travel. For them, there's probably a range number that works, and they don't really need more. For the uses for which we use our EV, that would be around 150 miles. The other thing about a low range requirement is it can make 120V charging viable. If you don't drive more than an average of about 40 miles/day, you can probably get enough electrons through a wall outlet. We spent over two years charging our Bolt only through 120V, while our house was getting rebuilt, and never had an issue.Those are extremes. There are all sorts of use cases in between, which probably represent the majority of drivers. For some users, what's needed is more range. But I think for most users, what's needed is better charging. Retrofit apartment garages like Tim's with 240V outlets at every spot. Install more L3 chargers in supermarket parking lots and alongside gas stations. Make chargers that work like Tesla Superchargers as ubiquitous as gas stations, and EV charging will not be an issue for most users.
MaintenanceCosts I don't have an opinion on whether any one plant unionizing is the right answer, but the employees sure need to have the right to organize. Unions or the credible threat of unionization are the only thing, history has proven, that can keep employers honest. Without it, we've seen over and over, the employers have complete power over the workers and feel free to exploit the workers however they see fit. (And don't tell me "oh, the workers can just leave" - in an oligopolistic industry, working conditions quickly converge, and there's not another employer right around the corner.)
Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh [h3]Wake me up when it is a 1989 635Csi with a M88/3[/h3]
BrandX "I can charge using the 240V outlets, sure, but it’s slow."No it's not. That's what all home chargers use - 240V.