Junkyard Find: 1977 Mercury Bobcat 3-Door

Murilee Martin
by Murilee Martin

You’d think that examples of the Ford Pinto and its Mercury-badged twin, the Bobcat, would have disappeared from the American junkyard ecosystem by now, given the cheapness of these cars and the decades of exploding-Pinto punchlines since “Pinto Madness” came out in 1977. No doubt due to the huge quantities sold during the Pinto/Bobcat’s 10-year production run (well over three million), such is not the case; I continue to find Pintos and Bobcats in junkyards to this day.

Here’s a light blue ’77 three-door Bobcat in a Northern California self-serve yard.

The Bobcat didn’t differ much from the Pinto at any point during its 1975-1980 production run. When you bought the Bobcat, you got some standard features that were optional on the Pinto, plus the bragging rights that came with ownership of the more upscale marque. In 1977, the Bobcat three-door started at $3,338, while the cheapest Pinto went for $3,099 (that’s about $14,630 and $13,580 in 2020 dollars, respectively).

The Bobcat came with cloth-and-vinyl bucket seats as standard equipment, though you still had to pay extra for a scratchy AM radio.

This one lived a hard life, at least in its later years. This spray-foam-and-tape trim repair speaks volumes.

California cars will rust, given enough time.

This one was on the street as recently as 2008, on the bayous mean streets of El Cerrito (home of Creedence Clearwater Revival).

A four-speed manual came as the base transmission in the ’77 Bobcat, but most Mercury shoppers insisted on automatics by that time.

These stickers look faded enough to have been installed by the original owner.

In 1977, Bobcat shoppers had the option of buying the same 2.8-liter V6 that went into the Capri, resulting in 90 horsepower at the driver’s command. This car got the base 2.3-liter four-cylinder, rated at 89 horses (but 20 fewer pound-feet of torque).

Bobcat and Pinto sales dropped quite a bit after 1977, partly due to the perceived risk of explosion during rear-end collisions and partly due to the increasing obsolescence of the late-1960s design.

Pintos really weren’t much more likely to explode than other cars with the fuel tank mounted between the rear bumper and rear axle. Unfortunately, most Detroit cars of the era used that layout, and so the danger went well beyond just the Pinto.

Watch out for intruding elephant trunks in your Bobcat!

Bobcat marketing focused on cheapness. Note the amazing Sports Accent Group Bobcat in this final-model-year TV commercial.







Murilee Martin
Murilee Martin

Murilee Martin is the pen name of Phil Greden, a writer who has lived in Minnesota, California, Georgia and (now) Colorado. He has toiled at copywriting, technical writing, junkmail writing, fiction writing and now automotive writing. He has owned many terrible vehicles and some good ones. He spends a great deal of time in self-service junkyards. These days, he writes for publications including Autoweek, Autoblog, Hagerty, The Truth About Cars and Capital One.

More by Murilee Martin

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 33 comments
  • Mike-NB2 Mike-NB2 on Jun 02, 2020

    At 23 seconds into the first ad that's Sgt. Lucy Bates (aka Betty Thomas) dealing with the elephant trunk. I'm sure that got her prepared for the likes of Renko and LaRue on The Hill. I may be a bit of a masochist, but I liked these cars, particularly the three-door wagons. But then again, I was only 11 when this particular car was built so I didn't need to worry about the repairs.

  • TommyT913 TommyT913 on Jun 02, 2020

    What yard is this in? I need the door panels.

  • Analoggrotto Does anyone seriously listen to this?
  • Thomas Same here....but keep in mind that EVs are already much more efficient than ICE vehicles. They need to catch up in all the other areas you mentioned.
  • Analoggrotto It's great to see TTAC kicking up the best for their #1 corporate sponsor. Keep up the good work guys.
  • John66ny Title about self driving cars, linked podcast about headlight restoration. Some relationship?
  • Jeff JMII--If I did not get my Maverick my next choice was a Santa Cruz. They are different but then they are both compact pickups the only real compact pickups on the market. I am glad to hear that the Santa Cruz will have knobs and buttons on it for 2025 it would be good if they offered a hybrid as well. When I looked at both trucks it was less about brand loyalty and more about price, size, and features. I have owned 2 gm made trucks in the past and liked both but gm does not make a true compact truck and neither does Ram, Toyota, or Nissan. The Maverick was the only Ford product that I wanted. If I wanted a larger truck I would have kept either my 99 S-10 extended cab with a 2.2 I-4 5 speed or my 08 Isuzu I-370 4 x 4 with the 3.7 I-5, tow package, heated leather seats, and other niceties and it road like a luxury vehicle. I believe the demand is there for other manufacturers to make compact pickups. The proposed hybrid Toyota Stout would be a great truck. Subaru has experience making small trucks and they could make a very competitive compact truck and Subaru has a great all wheel drive system. Chevy has a great compact pickup offered in South America called the Montana which gm could make in North America and offered in the US and Canada. Ram has a great little compact truck offered in South America as well. Compact trucks are a great vehicle for those who want an open bed for hauling but what a smaller more affordable efficient practical vehicle.
Next