Volkswagen Says ID.3 Still Coming, Even If It Isn't Ready

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Running a little behind in its electric vehicle program, Volkswagen plans to resume production of its battery-powered ID.3 hatchback this Thursday. This is part of its revised strategy aimed at helping the company endure the bleak outlook created by coronavirus countermeasures that upended the global economy.

Like most automakers, VW will be on the hook for sizable fines in Europe if it fails to improve fleet-wide emissions this year, and it’s now losing cash as factories remain shuttered and consumers hone their social distancing skills.

With the latter problem almost completely out of its grasp, Volkswagen is focusing on making sure the ID.3 lands on the market this summer — even if that means rushing it out the door in a less-than-ideal state. Back in February, it was reported that the model suffered from a glut of software issues (an oddly common issue with the brand’s pre-production EVs) that could force VW to delay the ID.3’s launch. That apparently won’t be an issue, as it’s just going to run with whatever code it has at the ready.

On Wednesday, a Volkswagen informed Automotive News that the converted Zwickau facility it now uses to build electric vehicles for the VW, Audi and Seat brands is a go for assembly. The site will resume production later this week so the ID.3 official debut can move ahead as planned.

“Our target is to deliver the 30,000 ID.3 first-edition pre-booked models to all customers at the same time,” a spokesperson explained.

“Vehicles built will be equipped with whatever version of the software suite is current at the corresponding time of their production and prior to their delivery to customers in summer will receive the latest version. Subsequent to the market launch the digital functions will then continue to be updated in regular increments in the following months.”

Based on the severity and frequency of February’s claimed software glitches, we’re curious to see how the first batch turns out. Thousands of those cars have already been built and are reportedly being held in storage while employees address technical issues. Worryingly, being manufactured without over-the-air updates seems to have been one of the problems, but our thoughts remain focused on how consumers will respond to this solution. Is this really how people are going to want to buy their cars moving forward?

Volkswagen is asking a lot by delivering a potentially broken product it plans on gradually remedying through months of remote updates. Tesla has shown some of the benefits of connected cars by issuing meaningful over-the-air overhauls that add features or improve performance. That said, Tesla has also shown how easily a corporation can use those same tools against consumers by charging for updates that never come (FSD) or digitally neutering cars on the secondhand market. VW’s willingness to use cutting-edge technologies to deliver an unfinished-sounding product seems wholly unnecessary and sets another lousy precedent for the industry.

Even if the ID.3’s launch isn’t a disaster, Volkswagen still expects customers to pay for the privilege of beta testing its latest model.

[Images: Volkswagen]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 10 comments
  • Victor Victor on Apr 23, 2020

    Come on people, this is VW. They'll just put a TDi down there with enough sound deadening and say it's an EV.

  • RHD RHD on Apr 23, 2020

    With every article I read, I feel better and better about buying used and paying cash. No lease headaches, no software glitches, no black box tracking, no potential on-the-road hacking, no Comprehensive insurance, no German Engineering, no monthly payments... and I can do all the maintenance and minor to moderate repairs myself for just the cost of the parts.

    • ToolGuy ToolGuy on Apr 23, 2020

      RHD, when I finish a repair job, I like to buy myself a tool. The 'reward' tool will often come in handy for the next repair - I haven't regretted any yet. (And my "Black Friday" tool purchases seem to always pay off.)

  • Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.
  • Lou_BC "That’s expensive for a midsize pickup" All of the "offroad" midsize trucks fall in that 65k USD range. The ZR2 is probably the cheapest ( without Bison option).
  • Lou_BC There are a few in my town. They come out on sunny days. I'd rather spend $29k on a square body Chevy
  • Lou_BC I had a 2010 Ford F150 and 2010 Toyota Sienna. The F150 went through 3 sets of brakes and Sienna 2 sets. Similar mileage and 10 year span.4 sets tires on F150. Truck needed a set of rear shocks and front axle seals. The solenoid in the T-case was replaced under warranty. I replaced a "blend door motor" on heater. Sienna needed a water pump and heater blower both on warranty. One TSB then recall on spare tire cable. Has a limp mode due to an engine sensor failure. At 11 years old I had to replace clutch pack in rear diff F150. My ZR2 diesel at 55,000 km. Needs new tires. Duratrac's worn and chewed up. Needed front end alignment (1st time ever on any truck I've owned).Rear brakes worn out. Left pads were to metal. Chevy rear brakes don't like offroad. Weird "inside out" dents in a few spots rear fenders. Typically GM can't really build an offroad truck issue. They won't warranty. Has fender-well liners. Tore off one rear shock protector. Was cheaper to order from GM warehouse through parts supplier than through Chevy dealer. Lots of squeaks and rattles. Infotainment has crashed a few times. Seat heater modual was on recall. One of those post sale retrofit.Local dealer is horrific. If my son can't service or repair it, I'll drive 120 km to the next town. 1st and last Chevy. Love the drivetrain and suspension. Fit and finish mediocre. Dealer sucks.
  • MaintenanceCosts You expect everything on Amazon and eBay to be fake, but it's a shame to see fake stuff on Summit Racing. Glad they pulled it.
Next