See You in September? Beijing Motor Show Delayed

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

The organizers of the Beijing International Automotive Exhibition have rescheduled the event on account of the novel coronavirus. Originally slated to cap off April, the trade show will now be held between September 26th and October 5th.

While China is supposedly coming out of health crisis in better shape than a lot of other countries, there are reasons to doubt the COVID-19 figures published by the Communist Party of China. The situation on the ground could be much worse than state-backed media and the World Health Organization indicate. However, even if the nation’s ludicrously low infection statistics are accurate, it is not surprising to see event organizers exercising caution.

Most countries have enacted travel restrictions and are advising (or demanding) people stay isolated to help combat the virus from spreading. Trade shows wouldn’t have attendees and those that did show up run the risk of spreading infection — which is why we’ve seen so many postponed or cancelled this year.

From the organizers of the Beijing International Automotive Exhibition:

In light of the serious challenges posted by the COVID-19 pandemic, after close consultation with the relevant parties, we, on behalf of the Organizing Committee of the 2020 (16th) Beijing International Automobile Exhibition [sic] (AUTO CHINA 2020), have decided to postpone the auto show which was initially planned at the new and old venues of China International Exhibition Center (CIEC) in April this year so as to effectively protect the health and safety of exhibitors and spectators. The AUTO CHINA 2020 is rescheduled to the following date — September 26 to October 5, 2020.

The spread of the pandemic has entailed the world economy comprehensive shocks. At this difficult time, it has become the consensus and belief of the global auto industry to firmly boost the morale and collaboration to maintain the stability of the world economy. We believe that AUTO CHINA 2020 is destined to be an extraordinary exhibition in the sense of not only an industry grand gathering to display the latest achievements and promote the trade and exchange of the global auto industries, but also an important moment to witness the colleagues across the global auto sector working together, uniting their efforts, overcoming the difficulties and revitalizing the industry!

Consider this a tentative date for the show. While many automotive trade events are being pushed back until the fall — making it an extra busy season this year — some are simply canceling plans for 2020. Postponements could easily become full-blown shutdowns if the situation calls for it. Still, everyone seems to be hoping COVID-19 subsides enough to restore some semblance of normalcy by autumn.

[Image: Carrie Fereday/Shutterstock]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 33 comments
  • HotPotato HotPotato on Apr 06, 2020

    I have no doubt that an authoritarian government -- or an elected leader with authoritarian preferences, for that matter -- would fudge the numbers. But it's also true that China took this much, much more seriously than we're doing. Check out the article in the New Yorker by the author who was living in Wuhan when this went down. Outside literally every apartment building stood a person who would take your temperature to make sure you had not gotten sick (with one of those remote sensors they just point at your forehead), and would have you walk through a pan of weak bleach solution to disinfect even your shoes, before you went back home. They also would send anyone who was ill to a quarantine center immediately for observation and escalation to treatment if needed (not that there's much we can do about this virus in terms of treatment, other than sticking you in an ice bath if your temperature becomes life-threatening, or use drugs in an off-label way that's probably a coin flip as to whether it will save you or kill you, but I digress). As the world's shop floor, they could turn on a dime to manufacture an enormous amount of tests and protective equipment. And with the Party's plan-for-literally-everything orientation and immense mobilization capability, they built hospitals in days. Here we have so few tests, and such slow test results, that a) it's a statistical certainty that we are undercounting cases, and b) by the time we have enough data to identify a hotspot, we're already much too late. We also don't have nearly enough PPE, and we make states bid against each other for it in the market instead of just providing it. And after 30-40 years of small-government foolishness we literally lack the capability for competent federal emergency response to a major emergency of, well, any kind, whether it's Hurricane Katrina or COVID-19. We used to take this stuff seriously in case the Russkies nuked us or unleashed smallpox or whatever. God help us now.

  • Roader Roader on Apr 06, 2020

    "But it’s also true that China took this much, much more seriously than we’re doing." That's funny: "Doctor Li had already become a national hero for alerting fellow doctors Dec. 30 in an online post about the emergence of a SARS-like illness, warning them to wear protective clothing to avoid infection. Li, along with seven others in Wuhan, were later arrested by local security police on charges of spreading rumors and forced to sign a document disavowing his statements and agreeing to quit speaking out." — 'South China Morning Post' "Preliminary investigations conducted by the Chinese authorities have found no clear evidence of human-to-human transmission of the novel corona virus identified in Wuhan, China." — World Health Organization (WHO), January 14, 2020 "In January President Xi Jinping made a decision that would ultimately condemn the world: allowing 5 million people to leave the epicentre of the virus without being screened." — '60 Minutes Australia' | March 29, 2020

    • See 1 previous
    • Roader Roader on Apr 06, 2020

      @Dan Compare and contrast: Deaths Per Million Population Spain 282 Italy 273 Belgium 143 France 133 Netherlands 108 Switzerland 90 United Kingdom 81 Sweden 47 Iran 46 Ireland 36 United States 33 China's not on there but of course no one except the CCP knows what their real numbers are. In the immortal words of a Hong Kong protester: "DON’T TRUST CHINA. CHINA IS ***HOLE."

  • ToolGuy First picture: I realize that opinions vary on the height of modern trucks, but that entry door on the building is 80 inches tall and hits just below the headlights. Does anyone really believe this is reasonable?Second picture: I do not believe that is a good parking spot to be able to access the bed storage. More specifically, how do you plan to unload topsoil with the truck parked like that? Maybe you kids are taller than me.
  • ToolGuy The other day I attempted to check the engine oil in one of my old embarrassing vehicles and I guess the red shop towel I used wasn't genuine Snap-on (lots of counterfeits floating around) plus my driveway isn't completely level and long story short, the engine seized 3 minutes later.No more used cars for me, and nothing but dealer service from here on in (the journalists were right).
  • Doughboy Wow, Merc knocks it out of the park with their naming convention… again. /s
  • Doughboy I’ve seen car bras before, but never car beards. ZZ Top would be proud.
  • Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.
Next