Nissan Temporarily Shutters Global Headquarters, Japanese Factories

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky
nissan temporarily shutters global headquarters japanese factories

Nissan said Tuesday that it plans to temporarily shut down its global headquarters and several factories in Japan to help curtail the spread of the novel coronavirus. While Japanese automakers are legally allowed to operate within the country (with conditions), most have instituted some amount of health countermeasures independently. The nation has also formed a joint council for automakers and component suppliers to work with the government in maintaining supply chains while avoiding future contagion risks.

Despite the level of precautions taken, the country’s automakers are still estimated to lose at least $1.6 billion as the pandemic suppresses demand around the world. Nissan, which issued profit warnings in 2019, went into 2020 expecting to eliminate thousands of positions so it could begin amassing $4.4 billion in savings by 2023. Marketing budgets and product lineups would also need to be rejiggered dramatically to assure profitability moving forward. With the coronavirus further complicating the company’s strategy, May’s idling could be about more than just containing the coronavirus.

Most Japanese automakers, including Nissan, have already stalled production due to supply chain issues and an overwhelming lack of customers. According to Reuters, Nissan said that 15,000 employees at its headquarters in Yokohama and main R&D center in the nearby Atsugi, Kanagawa Prefecture would be required to take leave for 16 days from next Monday through Japan’s “Golden Week” holiday — starting on May 4th.

From Reuters:

Its headquarters would be closed to all but essential workers, a Nissan spokeswoman said, adding that those affected would receive “the majority” of their full salaries during the period.

The spokeswoman said the measures were aimed at keeping more than 90 percent of its employees away from its offices, up from 80 percent at the moment.

Like many of its global rivals, Nissan has also shuttered most of its global production facilities in compliance with “shelter at home” directives to contain the spread of the virus.

Admirable. But Nissan is also expected to make huge production cuts in the years ahead — becoming a smaller, more stable company. That’s the hope, anyway. Analysts were predicting annual targets being cut by as much as 1 million units before the pandemic. The manufacturer is expected to released a revised plan (one that accounts for the coronavirus) next month, with most under the impression that intensified downsizing will be necessary. Nissan’s not alone in this, however. Rivals in better financial health have said they’re expecting 2020 production levels to be off target by as much as 50 percent.

By idling its headquarters, the automaker can probably save itself a bit of money as it also helps enact some useful social distancing measures. Still, it’s hardly an ideal scenario for the company. Many of non-essential workers will continue drawing from funds that can’t be replenished until things improve. But it doesn’t make much sense to ask them to come in when there’s precious little going on, and having assembly lines running when nobody’s buying automobiles seems unwise.

Nissan has already stalled production at its Tochigi plant — which produces Infiniti models — for the rest of this month and intends to continue doing so through much of May. Meanwhile, Nissan Motor Kyushu — which manufactures exported Rogue models in Fukuoka Prefecture — will continue operating on limited shifts before a brief 4-day closure next month.

Japanese automakers have already enacted plant closures in the United States and, more recently, have started scaling back production in their home country. Toyota slowed output to keep pace with demand and Honda said it will probably suspend production at several facilities to address supply chain problems with formerly shuttered Chinese factories that reopened on a limited basis.

[Image: FotograFFF/Shutterstock]

Join the conversation
4 of 13 comments
  • SCE to AUX Good summary, Matt.I like EVs, but not bans, subsidies, or carbon credits. Let them find their own level.PM Sunak has done a good thing, but I'm surprised at how sensibly early he made the call. Hopefully they'll ban the ban altogether.
  • SCE to AUX "Having spoken to plenty of suppliers over the years, many have told me they tried to adapt to EV production only to be confronted with inconsistent orders."Lofty sales predictions followed by reality.I once worked (very briefly) for a key supplier to Segway, back when "Ginger" was going to change the world. Many suppliers like us tooled up to support sales in the millions, only to sell thousands - and then went bankrupt.
  • SCE to AUX "all-electric vehicles, resulting in a scenario where automakers need fewer traditional suppliers"Is that really true? Fewer traditional suppliers, but they'll be replaced with other suppliers. You won't have the myriad of parts for an internal combustion engine and its accessories (exhaust, sensors), but you still have gear reducers (sometimes two or three), electric motors with lots of internal components, motor mounts, cooling systems, and switchgear.Battery packs aren't so simple, either, and the fire recalls show that quality control is paramount.The rest of the vehicle is pretty much the same - suspension, brakes, body, etc.
  • Theflyersfan As crazy as the NE/Mid-Atlantic I-95 corridor drivers can be, for the most part they pay attention and there aren't too many stupid games. I think at times it's just too crowded for that stuff. I've lived all over the US and the worst drivers are in parts of the Midwest. As I've mentioned before, Ohio drivers have ZERO lane discipline when it comes to cruising, merging, and exiting. And I've just seen it in this area (Louisville) where many drivers have literally no idea how to merge. I've never seen an area where drivers have no problems merging onto an interstate at 30 mph right in front of you. There are some gruesome wrecks at these merge points because it looks like drivers are just too timid to merge and speed up correctly. And the weaving and merging at cloverleaf exits (which in this day and age need to all go away) borders on comical in that no one has a bloody clue of let car merge in, you merge right to exit, and then someone repeats behind you. That way traffic moves. Not a chance here.And for all of the ragging LA drivers get, I found them just fine. It's actually kind of funny watching them rearrange themselves like after a NASCAR caution flag once traffic eases up and they line up, speed up to 80 mph for a few miles, only to come to a dead halt again. I think they are just so used to the mess of freeways and drivers that it's kind of a "we'll get there when we get there..." kind of attitude.
  • Analoggrotto I refuse to comment until Tassos comments.