Next-generation Mazda 6: The Best a Mazda (Sedan) Can Get?

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

The current-generation Mazda 6 debuted with a shapely body that withstood the passage of time and handling attributes that elevated it above other front-drive, midsize rivals. Alas, the car dropped as the market was moving away traditional midsize sedans. Not helping its case, Mazda was slow to respond with improvements — like a turbocharged 2.5-liter four-cylinder, for example, or all-wheel drive that still hasn’t appeared.

Word is that the next Mazda 6 will correct all criticism of the current car, donning a new layout and propulsion. By the sounds of it, the next-gen 6 will be everything an enthusiast wants, but will there be anyone left to buy it?

Drawing from insider knowledge and other portals, Car and Driver reports that the next Mazda 6 will appear in late 2022, bringing with it rear-drive architecture, an inline-six engine (mated to a 48-volt mild hybrid system), and, likely, a very slinky body.

The rear-drive-leaning proportions bestowed on Mazda’s current crop of sedans is much appreciated in a world filled with stumpy-hooded blandmobiles, but to go all the way would be a stark departure. It would also signal that Mazda, already ushering its products towards the upscale, is ready to challenge a new crop of rivals. A RWD/straight-six layout would place the 6 in the same field as, say, Genesis’ G70 and G80, or perhaps make it an alternative to Lexus’ rear-drive IS and front-drive ES.

Exterior style and interior construction, as seen on the brand’s latest models, can compare to loftier competitors. That leaves power and prestige. The former ingredient won’t be in short supply, as Car and Driver posits that the new engine — developed with help from partner Toyota — could make up to 350 horsepower. The latter ingredient is tougher, as Mazda has not traditionally been seen as an upscale brand. Badges and price point can have uneasy relationships, and the fairly shocking consumer reaction to the newly upmarket (but otherwise well-thought-out) Mazda 3 is proof of that.

If Mazda endows the next 6 with a body reminiscent of the Vision Coupe concept, the model won’t want for eye-catching style. Perhaps a sultry body can overcome a premium buyer’s resistance to mainly mainstream brand.

That said, the brand’s future volume will continue to rely heavily on utility vehicles, more so than ever before. Mazda 6 sales fell 30.4 percent in 2019, and the just-released CX-30 and upcoming, unnamed crossover slated for a joint Mazda-Toyota assembly plant in Alabama will play major roles in keeping the brand healthy. Perhaps, along with the continued success of the CX-5, these two crossovers will ensure actual cars continue to flow out of the brand.

[Image: Mazda]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 65 comments
  • StudeDude StudeDude on Apr 16, 2020

    I believe that Mazda will manufacture the new RWD 6 with both 4 and the new 6 cylinder powertrains. That will give them maximum flexibility in pricing and performance depending on the market where it's sold. AWD could be an option on either. The chassis will be an offshoot of the current Toyota platform saving time and money. Mazda will do the engine and use Aisin sourced 8 spd autos through the Toyota hookup. Toyota will use the Mazda engine in Lexus and maybe the Supra.

    • Burgersandbeer Burgersandbeer on Apr 16, 2020

      I would rather Mazda did the chassis and Toyota did the engine, but you are probably right. Can't wait to see what using a Lexus platform does for pricing on a Mazda with upmarket aspirations. Oh well

  • PastMazdaspeed6 PastMazdaspeed6 on Apr 21, 2020

    There has been a lot of talk about Mazda reliability. As a past owner of a Mazdaspeed6 for over 10 years, to be direct reliability was horrible. I spent over $25k in repairs during my ownership. I had to replace pretty much everything. I had talked with other Mazdaspeed6 owners and they had similar experiences: a money pit. As I came to realize, you get what you pay for. So I spent the money with my next and current car. No repairs whatsoever for years. Note I tend to hold onto cars for a long time. Again, you get what you pay for. Mazda is not a luxury or performance car manufacturer. In my opinion, they build great looking cars, but they are some of the most under-powered and unreliable cars out there. Mazda: please give up on the rotary already. If you purchased a non-mazdaspeed vehicle, you might have had a different and more positive ownership experience because you were not driving spirited. I think some car manufacturers are going to have a long overdue reckoning with the COVID-19 pandemic. In Capitalism, only the strong survive and flourish. Perhaps, their will be less players on the field in the near future and enable some to pick up more market share. That would be more dollars for developing vehicles. Probably better for everyone.

  • TCowner Need to have 77-79 Lincoln Town Car sideways thermometer speedo!
  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh I'd rather they have the old sweep gauges, the hhuuggee left to right speedometer from the 40's and 50's where the needle went from lefty to right like in my 1969 Nova
  • Buickman I like it!
  • JMII Hyundai Santa Cruz, which doesn't do "truck" things as well as the Maverick does.How so? I see this repeated often with no reference to exactly what it does better.As a Santa Cruz owner the only things the Mav does better is price on lower trims and fuel economy with the hybrid. The Mav's bed is a bit bigger but only when the SC has the roll-top bed cover, without this they are the same size. The Mav has an off road package and a towing package the SC lacks but these are just some parts differences. And even with the tow package the Hyundai is rated to tow 1,000lbs more then the Ford. The SC now has XRT trim that beefs up the looks if your into the off-roader vibe. As both vehicles are soft-roaders neither are rock crawling just because of some extra bits Ford tacked on.I'm still loving my SC (at 9k in mileage). I don't see any advantages to the Ford when you are looking at the medium to top end trims of both vehicles. If you want to save money and gas then the Ford becomes the right choice. You will get a cheaper interior but many are fine with this, especially if don't like the all touch controls on the SC. However this has been changed in the '25 models in which buttons and knobs have returned.
  • Analoggrotto I'd feel proper silly staring at an LCD pretending to be real gauges.
Next