Tesla's Stock Remains Insane

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Despite it only being a little over a month into 2020, Tesla’s stock has already doubled since New Year’s. Share prices surged to over $900 before Tuesday’s trading, leaving many scratching their heads as to how one of the smallest global manufacturers manages to clean up so well on Wall Street.

Seeking answers, Bloomberg looked to industry analysts and executives from rival car manufacturers to better understand Tesla’s mojo — and determine whether all the stock heat is warranted. The gist appears to be that Elon Musk and company are simply running away with battery technology, something that’s difficult to refute. However, some claims that Tesla has surpassed what constitutes an automaker feel overblown and not entirely consistent with reality.

“There’s a recognition that Tesla is in a preeminent position in terms of EV technology,” Peter Rawlinson, the chief executive officer of Lucid Motors and former Tesla employee, told the outlet at Monday’s BloombergNEF Summit in San Francisco. “They’re even further ahead than has been reported, and I think the gap is widening, not closing.”

While customers often have to pay more, the maximum range of Tesla vehicles consistently trumps whatever mainstream manufacturers can produce. Porsche’s Taycan was clearly designed as performance alternative to the Model S and is quite expensive at $103,800 (to start). Yet its maximum range barely exceeds 200 miles. Tesla’s sedan starts about $30,000 lower and will poop out closer to 370 miles.

That’s a cherry-picked example to highlight disparities. There are certainly smaller EVs with more reasonable MSRPs that can break the 250-mile barrier. But Tesla remains king in the premium market. Other brands can’t seem to touch its battery range, and it’s the only car business with a comprehensive network of EV charging stations.

“I’m not being critical of the Germans — it’s wonderful they’re creating these cars and coming in,” explained Adam Jonas, analyst at Morgan Stanley. “But it just shows much of this technological gulf remains.”

“We think they are pretty far ahead in battery and EV technology,” Jonas also said. “Tesla has moved from being seen as an auto stock to be seeing as a tech stock mentioned in the same breath as Amazon, Apple and Google.”

Tesla is absolutely an automaker; endlessly favoring anything that can be considered a tech company seems like a rather short-sighted way of trading. However, it is true that the business isn’t viewed the same way legacy automakers are. Plenty of people see Tesla as more than a car brand. They’re wrong, of course, but that matters little on the trading floor.

Waves of criticism don’t appear to have changed many opinions, either. We’ve often complained about CEO Elon Musk making unkept promises, and the whole world seems to be gradually turning on Autopilot, but it doesn’t appear to be hurting the company. In fact, Tesla’s ability to market itself has undoubtedly helped it get to where it is today. Major delays that would have embarrassed an established automaker were little more than hiccups for the American EV brand. We’re always one press conference or mysterious tweet away from Tesla being back in the headlines, usually underpinning some important change or new product. Combine that with an early lead in developing electric vehicles and you’ve won yourself a prize.

“The thesis for Tesla’s business miracle is rooted in the handful of years that the company operated with effectively no competition,” Gene Munster, managing partner of the venture capital firm Loup Ventures and long-time Apple analyst, wrote Monday in a research note. “Tesla has nearly a decade head start in EVs as other automakers under-invested in the space.”

Munster said Tesla’s valuation is as valid as investors choose it to be, predicting its market cap surpassing $140 billion over the next five years if traders continue prioritizing tech companies. He also said the latest surge was probably the result of short sellers — the bane of Elon Musk’s existence.

[Image: JL IMAGES/Shutterstock]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 40 comments
  • ToolGuy ToolGuy on Feb 04, 2020

    GM and/or Ford will crush this upstart like a bug... ...just as soon as they get their plans together.

    • See 1 previous
    • JimZ JimZ on Feb 05, 2020

      @Inside Looking Out just as likely personal car ownership will become rare as Uber becomes profitable because everyone's using them.

  • Randyinrocklin Randyinrocklin on Feb 04, 2020

    I have not checked on pricing on put options for tesla stock. But I would be loading up a couple of in the money puts.

  • Analoggrotto Does anyone seriously listen to this?
  • Thomas Same here....but keep in mind that EVs are already much more efficient than ICE vehicles. They need to catch up in all the other areas you mentioned.
  • Analoggrotto It's great to see TTAC kicking up the best for their #1 corporate sponsor. Keep up the good work guys.
  • John66ny Title about self driving cars, linked podcast about headlight restoration. Some relationship?
  • Jeff JMII--If I did not get my Maverick my next choice was a Santa Cruz. They are different but then they are both compact pickups the only real compact pickups on the market. I am glad to hear that the Santa Cruz will have knobs and buttons on it for 2025 it would be good if they offered a hybrid as well. When I looked at both trucks it was less about brand loyalty and more about price, size, and features. I have owned 2 gm made trucks in the past and liked both but gm does not make a true compact truck and neither does Ram, Toyota, or Nissan. The Maverick was the only Ford product that I wanted. If I wanted a larger truck I would have kept either my 99 S-10 extended cab with a 2.2 I-4 5 speed or my 08 Isuzu I-370 4 x 4 with the 3.7 I-5, tow package, heated leather seats, and other niceties and it road like a luxury vehicle. I believe the demand is there for other manufacturers to make compact pickups. The proposed hybrid Toyota Stout would be a great truck. Subaru has experience making small trucks and they could make a very competitive compact truck and Subaru has a great all wheel drive system. Chevy has a great compact pickup offered in South America called the Montana which gm could make in North America and offered in the US and Canada. Ram has a great little compact truck offered in South America as well. Compact trucks are a great vehicle for those who want an open bed for hauling but what a smaller more affordable efficient practical vehicle.
Next