U.S. Gas Stations Need to Update Payment Systems ASAP

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

You’ve probably noticed retailers are increasingly using the little chip on your credit or debit card to accept transactions. Unfortunately, fueling stations have been slower to adopt the change in digital security, as it requires more than simply putting a new screen at the checkout counter. Gas stations have to install expensive new pumps, which is why you tend to see more chip readers at the larger stations. Costco will definitely have them, but that little convenience store near your house where you fill up on Monday mornings may not.

Unfortunately, station operators that haven’t updated their pumps by October 2020 will become liable for any credit card fraud that occurs at their businesses now that Visa and Mastercard have rejected a request to further delay the deadline for chip readers.

While many retailers started making changes in 2015, a nationwide conversion was estimated to cost the industry roughly $3.9 billion — with many embracing the five-year extension credit offered by various firms. But that dries up this fall, and it’s looking like a lot of stations won’t make the deadline.

“[The industry is] massively under-prepared,” Joshua Smith, chief executive officer of Gas Pos, a vendor for point-of-sale systems, told Bloomberg this week. “There’s not enough technicians to do the installments … There’s not enough inventory. Even if there were enough contractors, there’s not enough dispensers available.”

Businesses that fail to upgrade could face costs of as much as $201,000 per store over the next seven years, according to data compiled by Conexxus. The industry group anticipates those it represents to endure $451 million in collective card fraud in 2020.

From Bloomberg:

In a 2019 survey by Conexxus, a non-profit that represents convenience stores, almost 70 [percent] of respondents who own a convenience store said they haven’t upgraded any outside pumps to the new so-called EMV [chip-based] technology.

Few companies manufacture the required pumps. Those that do — such as Dover Corp. or Fortive Corp.’s Gilbarco Veeder-Root — have said they’re expecting an increase in sales ahead of the deadline. Once the hardware is installed, fuel companies must have the pump software certified.

In the survey, over half of the participants cited a lack of available software for not having chip technology fully deployed, while about 15 percent faulted a shortage of hardware. The National Association of Convenience Stores (NACS) has also placed blame on the shoulders of Visa and Mastercard for not working with the industry when it came to establishing deadlines. However, the credit industry says EMV chip readers are far more secure than the old swipe system and are already the standard in places like Europe. It’s also becoming the norm for U.S. retailers, with fueling stations lagging far behind in overall adoption.

“There’s going to be quite a surprise come October,” Laura Townsend, senior vice president of the Merchant Advisory Group, explained. “Folks that have been trying to transition to EMV will be unable to because of things outside their control. But they will bear a significant increase in losses either come October or shortly thereafter because we know fraudsters will find the weakest link.”

[Image: Michael Vi/Shutterstock]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 59 comments
  • Mcs Mcs on Jan 10, 2020

    "3. Wait in line again to get your refund." Usually behind someone painstakingly selecting a dozen instant lottery tickets one-by-one, scratching them as they get them.

  • Redgolf Redgolf on Jan 10, 2020

    Lockstops - you talked me into it as I have just downloaded the Shell app since that's the gas I generally use, it's close to me, looking forward to saving a few cents per gallon also!;-)

  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh I'd rather they have the old sweep gauges, the hhuuggee left to right speedometer from the 40's and 50's where the needle went from lefty to right like in my 1969 Nova
  • Buickman I like it!
  • JMII Hyundai Santa Cruz, which doesn't do "truck" things as well as the Maverick does.How so? I see this repeated often with no reference to exactly what it does better.As a Santa Cruz owner the only things the Mav does better is price on lower trims and fuel economy with the hybrid. The Mav's bed is a bit bigger but only when the SC has the roll-top bed cover, without this they are the same size. The Mav has an off road package and a towing package the SC lacks but these are just some parts differences. And even with the tow package the Hyundai is rated to tow 1,000lbs more then the Ford. The SC now has XRT trim that beefs up the looks if your into the off-roader vibe. As both vehicles are soft-roaders neither are rock crawling just because of some extra bits Ford tacked on.I'm still loving my SC (at 9k in mileage). I don't see any advantages to the Ford when you are looking at the medium to top end trims of both vehicles. If you want to save money and gas then the Ford becomes the right choice. You will get a cheaper interior but many are fine with this, especially if don't like the all touch controls on the SC. However this has been changed in the '25 models in which buttons and knobs have returned.
  • Analoggrotto I'd feel proper silly staring at an LCD pretending to be real gauges.
  • Gray gm should hang their wimpy logo on a strip mall next to Saul Goodman's office.
Next