Sexy Infiniti Sibling Will Be Late to the Party

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

The second-generation Infiniti QX50 is a seldom talked-about model that gets plenty of mention on these digital pages, what with its technological wizardry and big launch expectations… that didn’t seem to do the compact crossover much good when it finally reached dealerships.

No problem — maybe customers will take more kindly to its QX55 sibling, teased late last year ahead of an early summer 2020 release. But hold on a second! It appears the QX55 won’t show up at the party until much later than expected.

According to a letter from the manufacturing team at Nissan’s Aguascalientes, Mexico assembly plant, production of the QX55 is delayed by nearly half a year, pushing its start date from June to November. The letter, obtained by Automotive News, claims the need to “ensure production capacity” lies at the center of the issue.

Nissan didn’t deny the delay when contacted by the publication.

For the struggling automaker, birthing a new model from an existing one is a cheap and easy way to boost sales and profits. Volkswagen’s doing it with the midsize Atlas — chopping the roofline and adding a pinch of styling flair to create the two-row Atlas Cross Sport. For Infiniti, however, there’s one major difference: the QX50 is a relative sales dud, making the QX55 a far more important addition to the Nissan Group family.

Arriving in late 2018 with an innovative, decade-in-the-making 2.0-liter variable displacement four-cylinder under its hood, the crossover’s sales sunk 26.7 percent in 2019. In comparison, the aging QX60 midsizer boasts far greater volume and much more stable demand.

“As sales of Q50 and Q60 [cars] continue to shrink, Infiniti needs to backfill their lost volume with new and relevant products. QX50 is one step, and QX55 is yet another,” AutoPacific analysts Ed Kim told AN.

The production delay means QX55 sales likely won’t make it to Nissan’s sales ledger this year; certainly, it will arrive too late to make any real impact. That leaves refreshed or redesigned Nissan-badged product (Sentra, Versa, Titan) to lure customers in the current year.

[Image: Nissan]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
 2 comments
  • Kyree Kyree on Jan 20, 2020

    Makes sense to me. I think a lot of people are off-put by the weird windswept trailing edge on INFINITI's newer wares (first done by the JX/QX60, but since copied by the Q50, Q60 and the QX50). And it looks like this doesn't have that. In fact, it looks a lot like the old FX/QX70. The FX was pretty, and looked like nothing else on the road, particularly the first-gen, post-refresh (2006-2008). Granted, the FX was also a RWD-based sports car on stilts, but I think most people bought it for the looks. If INFINITI can recapture any of that with the QX55, they may just see a reward. They won't be able to replicate the FX's long deck with a transverse engine architecture, but they can still make this look elegant.

  • Digitaldoc Digitaldoc on Jan 20, 2020

    I don't think styling is the issue of the QX50. Rather, this is the 1st gen of this new 2.0T, and for all of its fancy tech, it gets outperformed by simpler 2.0T 's, such as from BMW in the X3, in terms of power, and efficiency. Compounding this is a mediocre CVT, that magnifies the issue, and should not be in a luxury car. Unless this powertrain gets refined, pronto, Infiniti can stop wasting their time making this crossover. Also, would like to see a version of a 2.0T in the new Rogue, which should help their sagging sales.

  • GrumpyOldMan All modern road vehicles have tachometers in RPM X 1000. I've often wondered if that is a nanny-state regulation to prevent drivers from confusing it with the speedometer. If so, the Ford retro gauges would appear to be illegal.
  • Theflyersfan Matthew...read my mind. Those old Probe digital gauges were the best 80s digital gauges out there! (Maybe the first C4 Corvettes would match it...and then the strange Subaru XT ones - OK, the 80s had some interesting digital clusters!) I understand the "why simulate real gauges instead of installing real ones?" argument and it makes sense. On the other hand, with the total onslaught of driver's aid and information now, these screens make sense as all of that info isn't crammed into a small digital cluster between the speedo and tach. If only automakers found a way to get over the fallen over Monolith stuck on the dash design motif. Ultra low effort there guys. And I would have loved to have seen a retro-Mustang, especially Fox body, have an engine that could rev out to 8,000 rpms! You'd likely be picking out metal fragments from pretty much everywhere all weekend long.
  • Analoggrotto What the hell kind of news is this?
  • MaintenanceCosts Also reminiscent of the S197 cluster.I'd rather have some original new designs than retro ones, though.
  • Fahrvergnugen That is SO lame. Now if they were willing to split the upmarketing price, different story.
Next