Rumor Mill: Next Nissan Z Car to Go Retro?
While it still makes appearances at tuner events and car shows, the Nissan 370Z has roughly the same marketing heat as a pair of secondhand shoes. Last year, Nissan only moved 2,384 in the United States, with another 701 being sold in Europe — suggesting the decade-old (albeit fun) coupe may have outlived its usefulness years ago.
Its successor remains elusive, but persistent rumors claim Nissan is working on something to replace the venerable Z. Despite the manufacturer withholding any kind of confirmation, details leaked from dealer meetings suggest the brand is going with a heritage-inspired look, tapping vintage Z models for the design.
Whereas the general shape will remain similar to the 370Z, the front end is said to mimic the square mouth of the 240Z and come with nearly round headlamps. Meanwhile, the back half is supposed to adopt elements of the 300ZX.
According to Autoblog, unnamed sources who claim to have seen the prototype at dealer meetings say Nissan is “going back to the roots of the car” with its styling. Design elements from both the 300ZX (above) and 240Z (below) are said to be incorporated; however, spy shots of the vehicle believed to replace the current Z still show it wearing a modified 370Z body. That’s bad news for those hoping to catch a glimpse of the new sheetmetal, but it likely means Nissan is working on its powertrain.
From Autoblog:
From a powertrain perspective, we’re told that a version of the 3.0-liter twin-turbo V6 from the Infiniti Q50/Q60 400 Red Sport will be pulled for duty. That engine is paired with a nine-speed automatic transmission only right now, but we’re told a manual transmission will be offered alongside the automatic. As a reminder, Nissan did pair the 3.0-liter twin-turbo V6 with a manual in a 370Z SEMA show car previously, but it still hasn’t seen a production application.
As for a possible Nismo variant in the future, one of our sources also tells us it’s likely that we’ll see this version join the next-generation Z car eventually. Close to 500 horsepower is rumored for this specific flavor of Z.
Assuming the manufacturer sticks with the program, a new Z could manifest in a little over a year. Nissan Senior Vice President Ivan Espinosa even said to “expect something soon” back in October, adding that the car was already under development.
Stephanie Brinley, IHS Markit principal automotive analyst, told Autoblog that a new Z was already well overdue. “It’s getting old,” she said. “I think that some direction in the next couple years would be good. I think it’ll get to the point that safety compliance issues will need to be addressed.”
She also noted the company’s need to restore its image, suggesting a standout performance model could be the ticket. But Nissan has bigger fish to fry. Due to financial hardships, the business has entered into a major restructuring program requiring the elimination of 12,500 jobs. It’s also has to address lapses in quality control, conflict with alliance partner Renault, blowback from the Carlos Ghosn scandal, and a global fleet that’s in desperate need of new product.
All things considered, a low-volume Z car probably isn’t exceptionally high on Nissan’s list of priorities. However, if done correctly, it could show the automaker in a positive light for once. That doesn’t guarantee the 400Z (or whatever they end up calling it) won’t get delayed or cancelled, but it does offer hope that it could be one of the 12 new products the company plans to introduce over the next two years. Here’s to hoping it arrives soon, and with some of the retro moxie we saw on the IDx concept inspired by the Datsun 510 to boot.
[Images: Nissan; MasaPhoto/Shutterstock; imwaltersy/Shutterstock]
Consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulations. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, he has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed about the automotive sector by national broadcasts, participated in a few amateur rallying events, and driven more rental cars than anyone ever should. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and learned to drive by twelve. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer and motorcycles.
More by Matt Posky
Latest Car Reviews
Read moreLatest Product Reviews
Read moreRecent Comments
- Bouzouki It is easy to pick on GM in general, and the Cobalt in particular, due to the infamous ignition key cylinder issue/recall. And yet, back in the day, even Consumer Reports commented how it was "fun to drive" and every Cobalt should drive like that--though CR noted was expensive (around $20k base, $22-24k MSRP typical sticker). Car and Driver road tested one, with a mildly positive review, but not a rave. I need a car in late 2006, when my boss informed me I was losing my company car, as I would not be travelling for work. I wanted an inexpensive car with a manual trans. I drove a plebeian used Cobalt. I actually liked it. I came back, and was told I should not have driven that car, it was sold. But I liked the car, and started looking for a used one. So I went to another Chevy dealer. He had no manual trans Cobalts, new or used. No wait--he had this yellow supercharged SS. I could drive that. He unburied it (it had been sitting). It had the optional Recaro seat package. The car was a blast! If GM made a front-drive Camaro with a V8, this is what it might be like. I didn't like the color so I left. Then I found Car and Driver's first "Lightning Lap" test, circa 2006. In short, the Cobalt SS Supercharged that some here mock was FIVE seconds quicker than an 06 VW GTI. FIVE SECONDS! Even more impressive, it was a fraction quicker than a ... Mustang GT 5.0. A car with an extra 100 horses. So I looked and found a red one I generally like (options-wise. It needed the Recaro seats--best car seat EVER!). I had no problems with it over 4 years, 50k other than sliding into a curb on a snowy morning about a month after I bought it, causing about $2k of damage to suspension bits (the rim was gouged, but remained round! The tire was reused. The control arm and bearing and 1-2 other items needed replace, but car drove like new). I ordered some snow wheel/tires and put them on afterward. It was a good car in general, and a great-DRIVING car. The steering, shifter, exhaust note, power, engine smoothness. It was hard to believe this was a GM vehicle.... The back seat was big--but the ingress/egress was awful. I had too many cars at the time So I sold it after four years, one of the few cars I regret selling.
- JLGOLDEN Jeep, Dodge, and Chrysler don't have a suitable competitor for a high-volume segment such as compact crossovers. Abandoning Journey and Cherokee's $25K-$40K bandwidth, left the market to be eaten by Equinox/Terrain, Escape/Bronco Sport, Rogue, RAV 4, and on and on. Further, GM has reinvented entry-level with the striking new Trax and Envista. Nissan is swinging hard for new buyers with a re-invented Kicks. Instead of reading the room, Stellantis focuses on too many models with ambitious pricing at $50K and beyond.
- ToolGuy This might be a good candidate for an EV conversion.
- Tassos THE PERFECT TRUCK FOR ROUNDING UP IMMIGRANTS TO BRING THEM TO JAILS FOR FORCED TRANSGENDERED OPERATIONS. I HOPE ABDUL BUYS IT
- Tassos BEAUTIFUL GRYLL ON THIS ITERATION. NOT ENOUGH FINS AND NEEDS MORE WOOD VANEER INSIDE. I WANT MY 60s CADILLACS TO LOOK LIKE LOOMER. FIT FOR A FIRST LADY
Comments
Join the conversation
Here is how I'd play it if I were Nissan: Ditch the GTR in the US market. Replace put the drivetrain or a similarly performing one in this vehicle. Put the twin turbo Z back it the top of the Nissan food chain. Give us an NA 6 version for the masses. A sort of Japanese Mustang. Give Infinity a V8 version of the above. Make 4 doors an option for that as well. This isn't a new idea. Take the above car with 4 doors, install the NA6 affix Nissan emblems and Maxima badges. Lighten it, make it simple and drop a 4 in it and give me a modern 240. No, they won't...but it would be cool.
I'm sure all the current model needs is a black plastic piece added to the c-pillar to give everyone the floating roof design we all didn't know we needed.