Having Pulled Off Another Win, Subaru Predicts Yet Another

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

You read on Friday how Subaru exceeded its U.S. sales goal for 2019 by 117 vehicles, pushing its American volume to the highest point in the automaker’s history — up 2.9 percent from 2018, and more than 200 percent greater than its tally just a decade prior. A hard thing to achieve in a market that cooled off in 2019.

Subaru doesn’t see last year as a high water mark, however. For 2020, the brand has even loftier expectations, but everything will have to fall into place for it to happen.

With two shadowy products on the way but not imminent, Subaru will have to rely on boosted production of existing models, two of them revamped for the 2020 model year, as well as improved quality.

Both of these elements are in the process of being fixed, says CEO Tomomi Nakamura, formerly head of Subaru’s American arm. The brand’s head honcho freed up $1 billion to improve quality control after recalls earned it a black eye. Meanwhile, the brand’s wildly low 24-day supply of new vehicles in December will improve through increased output at the automaker’s Japanese and Indiana assembly plants, Automotive News reports.

Speaking at a media event last month, Nakamura said he wants to see an average of 45 days’ worth of new vehicles in 2020, adding that some models, such as the Impreza-based Crosstrek, ended the year with a 12-day supply. The industry average is north of 60, and sometimes even 70.

“We will be revamping our inventory around that number,” he said of the 45-day figure. “We may be able to hit an overall average of 45 days’ supply in the near future.”

Unlike larger automakers, Subaru’s sparse production footprint gives it the unusual ability to quickly unload all of the vehicles it builds. With overall sales on the rise, boosting capacity is a must. Output in Indiana is expected to rise by 30,000 vehicles this year, Nakamura said.

As for product itself, the CEO feels the redesigned Legacy and its wagon sibling, the Outback, will return greater sales in 2020, helping overall volume that received a big boost from the addition of the Ascent midsizer in mid-2018. Sales of the revamped-but-still-true-to-itself Forester also rose in 2019.

So, what’s the expectation for 2020? Volume of 720,ooo to 730,000, apparently.

“There is still growth possibility in the United States,” Nakamura told reporters, adding, “We think it is still possible for us to grow in the U.S. Sunbelt. We think that’s a frontier market for us. But it’s not just the Sunbelt. There is also the Snowbelt, especially the Northeast.”

While buyers in, say, Vermont have certainly adopted Subaru as a preferred brand, consumers in the sunny South have proven a harder nut to crack. There’s great regional differences in brand loyalty in the U.S., with various elements in play — among them, socioeconomic factors, consumer ethnicity, brand image, and weather. Standard full-time all-wheel drive is obviously a bigger draw in areas where there’s good reason to lose traction.

As for those two upcoming models, one is an electric crossover co-developed with Toyota. The other, billed as a global SUV, remains hazy, destined for a segment the automaker hasn’t yet revealed. Whatever the form these vehicles take, they won’t be on sale in 2020.

[Images: Subaru]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 27 comments
  • Inside Looking Out Inside Looking Out on Jan 06, 2020

    Subaru is best known for super-symmetric AWD.

  • Tankinbeans Tankinbeans on Jan 06, 2020

    I'm confused. Why is having a 24 day supply necessarily a bad thing? Wouldn't this indicate that they've forecasted the demand appropriately, and isn't this how they manage to sell their wares without resorting to incentive spending? Wasn't it just the other day there was the story of incentive spending and Subaru was at the bottom of the back with something like $1,500 per car? Couldn't more manufacturers learn from Subaru, the relative quality or lack thereof being an entirely separate issue? I'm genuinely curious.

    • ToolGuy ToolGuy on Jan 07, 2020

      60 days' supply has been the long-term target/rule of thumb for the U.S. market (and more recently probably more like 70). Going significantly over this number (usually because of poor sales) is a very bad thing - it ties up capital, and nothing good happens to vehicles that sit for too long (ex. flat spots on the tires, 12V battery deterioration). Lower days' supply sounds like a good thing. But when you are down to 12 days of Crosstrek inventory, you are losing sales. Remember that the days' supply figure is an average - the inventory is at >600 U.S. Subaru dealers. So if I want a Crosstrek and you don't have one, or if I really want a Limited and all you have are Base CVT models, or if I'm shopping for a Premium Manual, you see the issue. Not to mention options - and body color, which is huge for some buyers. If I order exactly the Crosstrek I want, it has to be shipped from Gunma. Shoving me into a model that I don't want, or persuading me to get a color or a trim that doesn't fit my long-term needs, results in an immediate sale for the dealer, but doesn't do Subaru and me any favors in the long term. (All of this might make you wonder if there would be better [and less expensive] models for vehicle ordering and distribution in the U.S. market. Other places use different methods.)

  • Jeff JMII--If I did not get my Maverick my next choice was a Santa Cruz. They are different but then they are both compact pickups the only real compact pickups on the market. I am glad to hear that the Santa Cruz will have knobs and buttons on it for 2025 it would be good if they offered a hybrid as well. When I looked at both trucks it was less about brand loyalty and more about price, size, and features. I have owned 2 gm made trucks in the past and liked both but gm does not make a true compact truck and neither does Ram, Toyota, or Nissan. The Maverick was the only Ford product that I wanted. If I wanted a larger truck I would have kept either my 99 S-10 extended cab with a 2.2 I-4 5 speed or my 08 Isuzu I-370 4 x 4 with the 3.7 I-5, tow package, heated leather seats, and other niceties and it road like a luxury vehicle. I believe the demand is there for other manufacturers to make compact pickups. The proposed hybrid Toyota Stout would be a great truck. Subaru has experience making small trucks and they could make a very competitive compact truck and Subaru has a great all wheel drive system. Chevy has a great compact pickup offered in South America called the Montana which gm could be made in North America and offered in the US and Canada. Ram has a great little compact truck offered in South America as well.
  • Groza George I don’t care about GM’s anything. They have not had anything of interest or of reasonable quality in a generation and now solely stay on business to provide UAW retirement while they slowly move production to Mexico.
  • Arthur Dailey We have a lease coming due in October and no intention of buying the vehicle when the lease is up.Trying to decide on a replacement vehicle our preferences are the Maverick, Subaru Forester and Mazda CX-5 or CX-30.Unfortunately both the Maverick and Subaru are thin on the ground. Would prefer a Maverick with the hybrid, but the wife has 2 'must haves' those being heated seats and blind spot monitoring. That requires a factory order on the Maverick bringing Canadian price in the mid $40k range, and a delivery time of TBD. For the Subaru it looks like we would have to go up 2 trim levels to get those and that also puts it into the mid $40k range.Therefore are contemplating take another 2 or 3 year lease. Hoping that vehicle supply and prices stabilize and purchasing a hybrid or electric when that lease expires. By then we will both be retired, so that vehicle could be a 'forever car'. And an increased 'carbon tax' just kicked in this week in most of Canada. Prices are currently $1.72 per litre. Which according to my rough calculations is approximately $5.00 per gallon in US currency.Any recommendations would be welcomed.
  • Eric Wait! They're moving? Mexico??!!
  • GrumpyOldMan All modern road vehicles have tachometers in RPM X 1000. I've often wondered if that is a nanny-state regulation to prevent drivers from confusing it with the speedometer. If so, the Ford retro gauges would appear to be illegal.
Next