Dastardly Diesels: Suzuki and Jeep Busted Breaking EU Emissions Rules

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

While Volkswagen remains the industrial face of diesel-related scandals, it’s just one of many automakers fingered for emissions cheating. VW was simply the first to be dragged through the coals, and its great shame encouraged governments around the world to launch investigations into whether or not other manufacturers are guilty of similarly uncouth behavior.

Dutch road authority RDW has a problem with diesel models produced by Jeep and Suzuki. While Europe has fallen out of love with the diesel of late, the accusations are a little worse than simply falling to adhere to EU emission standards. RDW says the two automakers used “prohibited emissions strategies” that allowed vehicles to emit higher levels of nitrogen oxide (NOx) on the road than during testing conditions.

Acting as the reference regulator for the European Union, RDW recalled Jeep Cherokees across the continent on Thursday to enact a software fix. According to Reuters, Suzuki has yet to find a solution for its problem model — the diesel-powered Vitara.

Suzuki said the diesel variants of its Vitara and S-Cross used motors and software supplied by Jeep parent Fiat Chrysler Automobiles. The automaker is required to issue a formal response to the Dutch investigation by the middle of February, at which point it will probably pass the buck to FCA.

With so many regulators around the globe going out of their way to suspect automakers of emissions cheating, we’re often left wondering how much of this is just a response to VW getting caught in 2015. While it could be an overreaction, that seems no more likely than automakers collectively engaging in illegal software mischief to ensure their vehicles pass increasingly stringent emission laws. Regulators have set the bar high and automakers are coming up with creative ways to reach it. Unfortunately, this appears to be happening beyond the confines of what’s legal.

German authorities recently announced a probe into Mitsubishi Motors for the suspected use of similar defeat devices installed in its diesel vehicles; keeping close tabs on all of its domestic automakers at the same time. In September, Mercedes-Benz parent Daimler was hit with an €870 million fine as part of a settlement regarding similar software issues. In the month that followed, a new investigation was announced concerning its Sprinter vans.

[Image: FCA]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
 2 comments
  • Ravenuer Ravenuer on Jan 27, 2020

    How many Suzuki diesels could there POSSIBLY be on this earth? Of course being in the USA could probably cloud my vision.

  • ToolGuy ToolGuy on Jan 28, 2020

    The grille in that picture seems to be violating several rules.

  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh I'd rather they have the old sweep gauges, the hhuuggee left to right speedometer from the 40's and 50's where the needle went from lefty to right like in my 1969 Nova
  • Buickman I like it!
  • JMII Hyundai Santa Cruz, which doesn't do "truck" things as well as the Maverick does.How so? I see this repeated often with no reference to exactly what it does better.As a Santa Cruz owner the only things the Mav does better is price on lower trims and fuel economy with the hybrid. The Mav's bed is a bit bigger but only when the SC has the roll-top bed cover, without this they are the same size. The Mav has an off road package and a towing package the SC lacks but these are just some parts differences. And even with the tow package the Hyundai is rated to tow 1,000lbs more then the Ford. The SC now has XRT trim that beefs up the looks if your into the off-roader vibe. As both vehicles are soft-roaders neither are rock crawling just because of some extra bits Ford tacked on.I'm still loving my SC (at 9k in mileage). I don't see any advantages to the Ford when you are looking at the medium to top end trims of both vehicles. If you want to save money and gas then the Ford becomes the right choice. You will get a cheaper interior but many are fine with this, especially if don't like the all touch controls on the SC. However this has been changed in the '25 models in which buttons and knobs have returned.
  • Analoggrotto I'd feel proper silly staring at an LCD pretending to be real gauges.
  • Gray gm should hang their wimpy logo on a strip mall next to Saul Goodman's office.
Next