Chevrolet Astro Revival? How About… No

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems
chevrolet astro revival how about 8230 no

This must be some sort of irony-steeped Radwood thing. How else to explain the sudden resurgence in enthusiasm for a mid-sized van that loitered in General Motors’ lineup for two uneventful decades?

It seems there’s a concerted — though perhaps not entirely honest — effort to return the lowly Astro to the Chevrolet stable. It’s a plaintive wail that will absolutely fall on deaf ears in the boardrooms of the Renaissance Center. And so it should.

Matthew Guy brought this campaign to my attention, resulting in a round of vitriol for GM’s rear-drive Astro and its GMC Safari twin. There’s a website devoted to the effort, as well as a totally bitchin’ video that sounds, at least, like it may have aired after an ad for New Coke.

Clearly, some van types remain enamoured with the bowtie box.

Chevy Astro production ran for 20 years, 1985 to 2005, with a second-generation model appearing exactly at the midpoint of its lifespan. After the initial base Iron Duke 2.5-liter (offered in cargo variants) left the engine roster in 1990, GM upped the versatility factor via optional all-wheel drive. The lone engine from then on was a 4.3-liter V6 sourced from the General’s truck stable.

Positioned as a larger, more voluminous alternative to Chrysler’s hot-selling minivans, the Astro and Safari are more often associated with the sad, rumbling, rusted-out hulks they became later in life. There were some neato bits, however, like a futuristic-but-annoying gauge cluster ( panned by John Davis) that eventually gave way to a conventional analog set. There’s one on eBay right now. Just imagine that speedometer climbing that hill on a chariot of light.

The most damning indictment of the Astro/Safari came from the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, which revealed the Astro’s dismal crash performance in graphic detail. That bolt-on subframe didn’t seem to lend much rigidity to the van, which folded like wet newspaper in a head-on hit. The buckling never ends!

If that driver has any leg left after that bone-snapping impact, at least the door is open for easy egress (or paramedic entry).

Given the General’s timely departure from the still-shrinking minivan segment and the continued production of a full-size commercial van line that’s barely changed since 1995, it’s unlikely GM will bend to these weirdos’ whims and create a successor to the Astro. There’s too much money to be made from the automaker’s dizzying array of crossovers and SUVs.

Spacious and versatile as it was, the Astro belongs to history now, and that’s where it should stay. There’s already a viable modern alternative for van types: the excellent Ford Transit and Transit Connect, both available as a cargo or passenger wagon.

[Image: General Motors]

Join the conversation
2 of 55 comments
  • NN NN on Jan 23, 2020

    Back in 1989 I was 9 years old and my Dad wanted to buy a new Suburban for the family. He couldn't swing the payments so the dealer talked him into an Astro, the "man van". Suited our family of 6 perfectly. By the time I was driving in the mid 90's the van was often mine. In 1999 my brother hydroplaned off the interstate and totaled the van, although he walked away just fine. Now it is 2020 and I drive a Ford Transit Connect for my family of 5. The modern "man van", or closest thing to it. Apple doesn't fall far from the tree.

  • TrevorBentley TrevorBentley on Jan 22, 2021

    How about... ... the ASTRO was the best van for adventure any company has ever made.

  • 3SpeedAutomatic Drove a rental Cherokee for several days at the beginning of this year. Since the inventory of rental cars is still low, this was a 2020 model with 48k miles and V6. Ran fine, no gremlins, graphics display was easy to work, plenty of power, & very comfortable. Someone must of disarmed the lane assistance feature for the steering wheel never shook (YES!!!!!!!!). However, this woman's voice kept nagging me about the speed limit (what's new!?!?!?!).I was impressed enough to consider this a prime candidate to replace my 11 yr old Ford Escape. Might get a good deal with the close out of the model. Time will tell. 🚗🚗🚗
  • Bullnuke One wonders if this poor woman entered the US through Roxham Road...
  • Johnds Years ago I pulled over a vehicle from either Manitoba or Ontario in North Dakota for speeding. The license plates and drivers license did not come up on my dispatchers computer. The only option was to call their government. Being that it was 2 am, that wasn’t possible so they were given a warning.
  • BEPLA My own theory/question on the Mark VI:Had Lincoln used the longer sedan wheelbase on the coupe - by leaning the windshield back and pushing the dashboard & steering wheel rearward a bit - not built a sedan - and engineered the car for frameless side windows (those framed windows are clunky, look cheap, and add too many vertical lines in comparison to the previous Marks) - Would the VI have remained an attractive, aspirational object of desire?
  • VoGhost Another ICEbox? Pass. Where are you going to fill your oil addiction when all the gas stations disappear for lack of demand? I want a pickup that I can actually use for a few decades.