After New Funding Round, Rivian Ends the Year Flush

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

An electric vehicle platform many can’t wait to get their hands on continues to make Rivian the upstart automaker to watch. The fledgling, Michigan-based automaker just closed a $1.3 billion investment round led by T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. — pushing the company’s 2019 take to $2.8 billion.

With two utility vehicles on the way and a pledge to license its EV architecture to anyone willing to pay for it, Rivian’s big-buck backing from the likes of Ford, Amazon, and Cox Automotive was just the start.

For the record, Amazon and Ford also participated in the most recent round of funding via their own fund manager. Earlier this year, Amazon ponied up $700 million for Rivian, with Ford coming along and offering a half-billion dollars of its own. Cox’s investment amounted to $350 million.

“This investment demonstrates confidence in our team, products, technology and strategy – we are extremely excited to have the support from such strong shareholders,” said Rivian Founder and CEO RJ Scaringe in a statement.

It didn’t take long before product promises sprung up in the wake of the earlier rounds of funding. In September, Amazon announced an order of 100,000 electric delivery vans from the company, with Ford tapping the startup for a jointly developed EV crossover. More recently, a report arose that a Lincoln crossover to be introduced in mid-2022 will ride atop Rivian’s “skateboard” platform. A Ford-badged twin could also be in the wings.

“As we continue in our transformation of Ford with new forms of intelligent vehicles and propulsion, this partnership with Rivian brings a fresh approach to both,” Ford CEO Jim Hackett said last April. “At the same time, we believe Rivian can benefit from Ford’s industrial expertise and resources.”

While the partnership with Ford and Amazon no doubt boosted Rivian’s investor appeal, the company’s decision to license its platform to any and all automakers likely served to supercharge its attractiveness to investors.

Starting in late 2020, Rivian plans to build its R1T pickup and R1S SUV at a former Mitsubishi plant in Normal, Illinois, with the loftiest variant of each expected to reach 400 miles of range. In a display of what four independent electric motors can do for drivers, Rivian released a video on Christmas of an R1T performing a “tank turn” — a near-stationary 180 accomplished by having the port wheels full ahead and the starboard wheels full astern.

Tank Turn. Available on the R1T and R1S :) pic.twitter.com/AsRKnFJGWr

— Rivian (@Rivian) December 25, 2019

[Image: Rivian]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 18 comments
  • Kosmo Kosmo on Dec 27, 2019

    A few lines of code to perform, a few more to "sense" when there is too much traction to allow damage-free execution. This is gonna be fun in ski area parking lots!!!

    • ToolGuy ToolGuy on Dec 28, 2019

      In tight quarters I generally recommend counter-clockwise tank turns - easier to gauge clearance for the more-cantilevered back end.

  • Tele Vision Tele Vision on Dec 27, 2019

    Put a wee Diesel engine and fuel tank somewhere in it - then take my money.

  • SCE to AUX The nose went from terrible to weird.
  • Chris P Bacon I'm not a fan of either, but if I had to choose, it would be the RAV. It's built for the long run with a NA engine and an 8 speed transmission. The Honda with a turbo and CVT might still last as long, but maintenance is going to cost more to get to 200000 miles for sure. The Honda is built for the first owner to lease and give back in 36 months. The Toyota is built to own and pass down.
  • Dwford Ford's management change their plans like they change their underwear. Where were all the prototypes of the larger EVs that were supposed to come out next year? Or for the next gen EV truck? Nowhere to be seen. Now those vaporware models are on the back burner to pursue cheaper models. Yeah, ok.
  • Wjtinfwb My comment about "missing the mark" was directed at, of the mentioned cars, none created huge demand or excitement once they were introduced. All three had some cool aspects; Thunderbird was pretty good exterior, let down by the Lincoln LS dash and the fairly weak 3.9L V8 at launch. The Prowler was super cool and unique, only the little nerf bumpers spoiled the exterior and of course the V6 was a huge letdown. SSR had the beans, but in my opinion was spoiled by the tonneau cover over the bed. Remove the cover, finish the bed with some teak or walnut and I think it could have been more appealing. All three were targeting a very small market (expensive 2-seaters without a prestige badge) which probably contributed. The PT Cruiser succeeded in this space by being both more practical and cheap. Of the three, I'd still like to have a Thunderbird in my garage in a classic color like the silver/green metallic offered in the later years.
  • D Screw Tesla. There are millions of affordable EVs already in use and widely available. Commonly seen in Peachtree City, GA, and The Villages, FL, they are cheap, convenient, and fun. We just need more municipalities to accept them. If they'll allow AVs on the road, why not golf cars?
Next