Bombshell: General Motors Sues Fiat Chrysler, Names Marchionne in Union Bribery Scheme

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

As members of the media swarm over new vehicles in Los Angeles, a legal drama is playing out in Detroit. General Motors has filed a federal racketeering lawsuit against cross-town rival Fiat Chrysler, alleging FCA conspired to undermine the collective bargaining process and create unfair advantages by bribing UAW officials.

This cost GM lots of money, the automaker claims, and now it wants to collect.

“This lawsuit is intended to hold FCA accountable for the harm its actions have caused our company and to ensure a level playing field going forward,” said Craig Glidden, GM Executive Vice President and General Counsel, in a statement.

GM’s RICO suit targets FCA and executives who pled guilty in the lengthy federal investigation into corruption among the upper ranks of the United Auto Workers. That probe ensnared, among others, former FCA labor relations chief Alphons Iacobelli and Norwood Jewell, former vice president of the union’s FCA department.

From GM:

FCA was the clear sponsor of pervasive wrongdoing, paying millions of dollars in bribes to obtain benefits, concessions, and advantages in the negotiation, implementation, and administration of labor agreements over time.

FCA corrupted the implementation of the 2009 collective bargaining agreement. It also corrupted the negotiation, implementation, and administration of the 2011 and 2015 agreements.

FCA’s manipulation of the collective bargaining process resulted in unfair labor costs and operational advantages, causing harm to GM.

As reported by Reuters, the suit alleges that late FCA CEO Sergio Marchionne was well aware of the bribery. “Marchionne was a central figure in the conceiving, executing and sponsoring of the fraudulent activity,” Glidden said in the suit.

Marchionne, who died in July 2018, conspired to negotiate a new labor deal “designed, through the power of pattern bargaining, to cost GM billions,” he claimed.

Just how much GM hopes to collect is unknown, though the automaker claims, “All damages recovered will be invested in the U.S. to benefit GM’s employees and grow jobs.”

The suit comes a month after GM weathered a 40-day strike by UAW-affiliated workers; eventually, the automaker forged a new labor agreement that kept existing healthcare benefits and brought temporary workers a pathway to full-time employment. Wage increases and boosted bonuses were also part of the deal. Currently, FCA finds itself facing the UAW bargaining team.

FCA is well aware of the timing.

“We are astonished by this filing, both its content and its timing,” the company said in a statement. “We can only assume this was intended to disrupt our proposed merger with PSA as well as our ongoing negotiations with the UAW. We intend to vigorously defend against this meritless lawsuit and pursue all legal remedies in response to it.”

Glidden told media Wednesday afternoon that the lawsuit has nothing to do with the proposed FCA-PSA merger. Nor will it involve the UAW, he added.

“Our sole focus is FCA,” Glidden said.

[Image: General Motors]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 42 comments
  • Lou_BC Lou_BC on Nov 21, 2019

    Claiming that "pattern bargaining" hurt Chevy is stupid since FCA workers are paid significantly less than GM workers. If the "pattern" were to hold GM would have benefited from FCA's lower wage/benefit packages. Conversely, GM's higher wage and benefit contract with the UAW means that the "pattern" is set and FCA will get saddled with a larger wage/benefit contract.

  • Akear Akear on Nov 21, 2019

    I think GM is worried about PSA's EV technology and its place in the North American market. PSA got a lot of this modern EV technology from Opel, which GM sold to PSA several years ago. GM probably would not be in this situation if they did not sell off Opel.

  • ToolGuy First picture: I realize that opinions vary on the height of modern trucks, but that entry door on the building is 80 inches tall and hits just below the headlights. Does anyone really believe this is reasonable?Second picture: I do not believe that is a good parking spot to be able to access the bed storage. More specifically, how do you plan to unload topsoil with the truck parked like that? Maybe you kids are taller than me.
  • ToolGuy The other day I attempted to check the engine oil in one of my old embarrassing vehicles and I guess the red shop towel I used wasn't genuine Snap-on (lots of counterfeits floating around) plus my driveway isn't completely level and long story short, the engine seized 3 minutes later.No more used cars for me, and nothing but dealer service from here on in (the journalists were right).
  • Doughboy Wow, Merc knocks it out of the park with their naming convention… again. /s
  • Doughboy I’ve seen car bras before, but never car beards. ZZ Top would be proud.
  • Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.
Next