Ford's 2020 Explorer Hasn't Left the Woods Just Yet, Report Claims

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Plagued by reports of manufacturing defects and post-production emergency surgery at Flat Rock Assembly, Ford’s Chicago-built 2020 Explorer and Lincoln Aviator platform mate are a weight placed on the shoulders (and career) of CEO Jim Hackett. It’s also weighing down the company’s stock, analysts claim.

While the automaker said earlier this month that Explorer supply was on the upswing, with new vehicles now shipping directly to dealers, it seems Bill Shatner hasn’t shot all of the gremlins off the wing of this flight.

According to Bloomberg, not all new Explorers are making the trip directly from Chicago Assembly to various dealers. A shipment of 2,500 Explorers recently turned up at Flat Rock for post-production fixes, sources claim, and some dealers are now tasked with fully baking the pies they’ve been handed before turning them over to customers.

While the equally new Ford Escape has, um, escaped the problems afflicting the brand’s new midsizers, the importance of the Explorer line to the company’s bottom line — plus the hefty load of cash that went into upgrading the Chicago plant — is something Hackett might have to address during a third-quarter earnings report expected Wednesday. The plant upgrade, along with other initiatives, was meant to mend long-standing problems at Chicago Assembly. At least in terms of product, that didn’t occur.

While Ford claims no knowledge of it, sources say “roving groups of workers” are intimidating other employees within the bowels of Chicago Assembly, hampering production and leading to mistakes that must be fixed offsite. Ford is waiting for UAW-affiliated General Motors workers to ratify a new contract agreement before bargaining can begin.

The botched launch hasn’t helped the brand’s stock price recover from the Mark Fields days, either, something Hackett’s survival is staked on. The company’s shares have fallen 15 percent since the CEO switch. Indeed, Hackett, joined by Chairman Bill Ford Jr, was all over the Explorer launch, putting his face on the new model. At the time, the new Explorer served as proof of the company’s — and the plant’s — turnaround.

“This Explorer issue is going to be a big negative for the quarter,” said Morningstar analyst David Whiston. “It’s a viciously competitive market and you don’t want to be missing one of your big hitters.”

According analysts’ predictions, the previous quarter will not bear good financial news. Profit and revenue are both expected to slip, something the Explorer and Aviator can take credit for.

[Image: Ford]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
6 of 61 comments
  • Gone are the times when people had pride in their work. New generations don't care and have no interest in anything outside of laziness and themselves. Remember that when you put your life in the hands of one of these soul-less humans. Bring in the robots.

    • See 3 previous
    • ToddAtlasF1 ToddAtlasF1 on Oct 21, 2019

      @Greg Hamilton Toyota dumped those UAW 'workers' before they ever let another worker go for demand reasons. Wake up.

  • Jimmyy Jimmyy on Oct 21, 2019

    Pay your engineers as little as possible. And, make sure pay a premium only for diversity. Grades comes second. What could go wrong? Everything.

  • Funky D The problem is not exclusively the cost of the vehicle. The problem is that there are too few use cases for BEVs that couldn't be done by a plug-in hybrid, with the latter having the ability to do long-range trips without requiring lengthy recharging and being better able to function in really cold climates.In our particular case, a plug-in hybrid would run in all electric mode for the vast majority of the miles we would drive on a regular basis. It would also charge faster and the battery replacement should be less expensive than its BEV counterpart.So the answer for me is a polite, but firm NO.
  • 3SpeedAutomatic 2012 Ford Escape V6 FWD at 147k miles:Just went thru a heavy maintenance cycle: full brake job with rotors and drums, replace top & bottom radiator hoses, radiator flush, transmission flush, replace valve cover gaskets (still leaks oil, but not as bad as before), & fan belt. Also, #4 fuel injector locked up. About $4.5k spread over 19 months. Sole means of transportation, so don't mind spending the money for reliability. Was going to replace prior to the above maintenance cycle, but COVID screwed up the market ( $4k markup over sticker including $400 for nitrogen in the tires), so bit the bullet. Now serious about replacing, but waiting for used and/or new car prices to fall a bit more. Have my eye on a particular SUV. Last I checked, had a $2.5k discount with great interest rate (better than my CU) for financing. Will keep on driving Escape as long as A/C works. đźš—đźš—đźš—
  • Rna65689660 For such a flat surface, why not get smoke tint, Rtint or Rvynil. Starts at $8. I used to use a company called Lamin-x, but I think they are gone. Has held up great.
  • Cprescott A cheaper golf cart will not make me more inclined to screw up my life. I can go 500 plus miles on a tank of gas with my 2016 ICE car that is paid off. I get two weeks out of a tank that takes from start to finish less than 10 minutes to refill. At no point with golf cart technology as we know it can they match what my ICE vehicle can do. Hell no. Absolutely never.
  • Cprescott People do silly things to their cars.
Next