QOTD: Flee, Go Underground, or Give In?

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

They’re coming, and if you want to hang on to what’s near and dear to you, you’ve got to make a decision. And fast.

Well, maybe give it a few years.

As lawmakers and wannabe lawmakers go hog wild on proposed internal combustion bans in Europe, the idea has taken hold in North America. Different culture, different travel distances, different landscapes, but the same rhetoric. Same solutions. Same challenges, too, though there might be a few additional ones over here.

When they come for your car, what will you do?

Oh, you’ll still be allowed to buy a new vehicle, alright — it just won’t have any cylinders pumping beneath the hood. Under proposals issued by the Justice Democrats in the U.S. and the Green Party in Canada, all internal combustion passenger vehicles would have to disappear from new car lots in 10 years. A lot of other things will also have to disappear to reach the goals of both manifes- er, proposals. But that’s another matter.

Given the astronomical amounts of cash needed to fund the other policies stuffed into each plan like a legislative Kinder egg, it’s hard to imagine EV subsidies will be of the sky-high, I-don’t-care-as-long-as-I’m-getting-all-this-cash variety. The free ride will be found at your local college, not in your driveway.

It’s hard not to think of that Rush song at times like these. Frankly, I don’t relish the thought of having vehicular choice taken away from me any more than I like the idea of watching Jim Hackett try on a halter top and a pair of Daisy Dukes. It’s nice to choose between environmental stewardship and a vehicle that satisfies other needs, including versatility, range, price, and that visceral feeling of being in control of an amazingly complex mechanical beast. A vehicle with a throaty (or any) exhaust.

Maybe EVs will be everything we could ever dream of in a decade’s time. Maybe they won’t. But there’s a set of crosshairs placed over the ninety-eight-point-something-percent of new vehicles sold today by people who might eventually get what they want.

Sure, you might be able to keep your existing car come 2030, but driving it to work on the daily? Entering urban cores? This remaining fleet could be, as they say, problematic. Owners might find their movements severely restricted. Maybe these reviled relics will even become the automotive equivalent of a “wall hanger” firearm — something that, while nice to look at, is deemed unfit for actual use.

Should such laws come to pass, do you plan to go gently into that good, green night, or is your plan to rage against the dying of the (check engine) light? What form will your resistance take?

[Image: Murilee Martin/TTAC]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 124 comments
  • Inside Looking Out Inside Looking Out on Sep 20, 2019

    Daimler Benz, the company that invented automobile, announced that they stop development of IC engines to focus on EV development. If it isn't the writing on the wall then I don't know what is. ICE is doomed because car companies will stop offering cars with ICE. EV is more efficient, less problem prone, simpler, require much less maintenance, faster, have more torque, more space, electricity can be generated using any available source of energy including renewables (try that with ICE), electricity easier to deliver to charging stations, it is safer. Model 3 beats any ICE car, even Porsche.

  • Schmitt trigger Schmitt trigger on Sep 20, 2019

    @SCE to AUX A little off topic, but I finally understood your screen name. What an incredible Apollo 12 story!

  • Dave M. IMO this was the last of the solidly built MBs. Yes, they had the environmentally friendly disintegrating wiring harness, but besides that the mechanicals are pretty solid. I just bought my "forever" car (last new daily driver that'll ease me into retirement), but a 2015-16 E Class sedan is on my bucket list for future purchase. Beautiful design....
  • Rochester After years of self-driving being in the news, I still don't understand the psychology behind it. Not only don't I want this, but I find the idea absurd.
  • Douglas This timeframe of Mercedes has the self-disintegrating engine wiring harness. Not just the W124, but all of them from the early 90's. Only way to properly fix it is to replace it, which I understand to be difficult to find a new one/do it/pay for. Maybe others have actual experience with doing so and can give better hope. On top of that, it's a NH car with "a little bit of rust", which means to about anyone else in the USA it is probably the rustiest W124 they have ever seen. This is probably a $3000 car on a good day.
  • Formula m How many Hyundai and Kia’s do not have the original engine block it left the factory with 10yrs prior?
  • 1995 SC I will say that year 29 has been a little spendy on my car (Motor Mounts, Injectors and a Supercharger Service since it had to come off for the injectors, ABS Pump and the tool to cycle the valves to bleed the system, Front Calipers, rear pinion seal, transmission service with a new pan that has a drain, a gaggle of capacitors to fix the ride control module and a replacement amplifier for the stereo. Still needs an exhaust manifold gasket. The front end got serviced in year 28. On the plus side blank cassettes are increasingly easy to find so I have a solid collection of 90 minute playlists.
Next