Junkyard Find: 1984 Dodge 600 Landau Coupe With Five-speed Manual Transmission

Murilee Martin
by Murilee Martin

Once Lee Iacocca’s front-wheel-drive K-cars brought Chrysler back from near-death and into profitability, the platform became the basis of a sprawling family of K-related relatives. One of the earliest spinoffs was the E Platform, a lengthened K that gave us the Chrysler E-Class/New Yorker, the Plymouth Caravelle, and the Dodge 600. Just to confuse matters, the Dodge 600 coupe remained a true K, sibling to the Dodge Aries.

That’s what we’ve got here, and this Denver 600 coupe has some stories to tell.

Five-speed manual transmissions still seemed sort of racy in 1984. Because the slushboxization of the American car-buying public was well along by the middle 1980s, very few Detroit cars with luxury pretensions came from the factory with three-pedal setups; this is the first Chrysler E-Body I’ve seen with a five-speed.

Someone must have wanted that hard-to-find (well, not really hard-to-find) transmission and didn’t want to remove the engine, because this ingenious engine-support rig holds the engine in place. Maybe a junkyard visitor brought it along and then, its job done, left it behind. Maybe the car’s final owner pulled the transmission with the idea of fixing it, and then life intervened (in the form of a tow truck from U-Pull-&-Pay) and hauled away the car, engine-support bar and all.

Cheap but effective.

Although Chrysler hoped to snatch some sales away from European marques with the 600 coupe, the front end looks lifted straight from the incredibly non-Euro-looking (and pre-Iaccocan) Mirada.

We’ve got a no-holds-barred Whorehouse Red Velour™ interior here, and it still looks very clean at age 35.

I don’t know if Dodge still called the padded part-roof treatment a Landau by 1984, but that’s what this is.

I found a bunch of realtor-related paperwork from the 1980s inside, so I think the car may have died or been parked at a very young age.

Looks like a mere 72,922 miles on the clock.

Commitment? Pfft, that went out with the hula hoop!

If you like these Junkyard Finds, you can get to about 1,700 more of them by going to the Junkyard Home of the Murilee Martin Lifestyle Brand.








Murilee Martin
Murilee Martin

Murilee Martin is the pen name of Phil Greden, a writer who has lived in Minnesota, California, Georgia and (now) Colorado. He has toiled at copywriting, technical writing, junkmail writing, fiction writing and now automotive writing. He has owned many terrible vehicles and some good ones. He spends a great deal of time in self-service junkyards. These days, he writes for publications including Autoweek, Autoblog, Hagerty, The Truth About Cars and Capital One.

More by Murilee Martin

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 55 comments
  • EBFlex No they shouldn’t. It would be signing their death warrant. The UAW is steadfast in moving as much production out of this country as possible
  • Groza George The South is one of the few places in the U.S. where we still build cars. Unionizing Southern factories will speed up the move to Mexico.
  • FreedMike I'd say that question is up to the southern auto workers. If I were in their shoes, I probably wouldn't if the wages/benefits were at at some kind of parity with unionized shops. But let's be clear here: the only thing keeping those wages/benefits at par IS the threat of unionization.
  • 1995 SC So if they vote it down, the UAW gets to keep trying. Is there a means for a UAW factory to decide they no longer wish to be represented and vote the union out?
  • Lorenzo The Longshoreman/philosopher Eri Hoffer postulated "Every great cause begins as a movement, becomes a business, and ends up as a racket." That pretty much describes the progression of the United Auto Workers since World War II, so if THEY are the union, the answer is 'no'.
Next