Nissan's Financial Report Worse Than Expected

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

On Wednesday, we reported Nissan was preparing a financial report that was presumed to involve quarterly profit falling by around 90 percent — necessitating roughly 10,000 job cuts. At the time, Nissan gave some vague confirmation that the estimates were accurate while halfheartedly attempting to refute them.

However, when the official numbers came out on Thursday, the reality was worse than initially assumed. Nissan reported an almost 99-percent drop in operating profit in the latest quarter, citing falling sales in every major market except China. Rather than 10,000 job cuts, it’ll require 12,500.

From Nissan:

The company is moving quickly to optimize cost structures and manufacturing operations, while also enhancing brand value, steadily refreshing its lineup and achieving consistent growth globally, including in the U.S.

To improve its overall utilization rate, Nissan will reduce its global production capacity by 10 [percent] by the end of fiscal year 2022. In line with production optimizations, the company will reduce headcount by roughly 12,500. Furthermore, the company will reduce the size of its product lineup by at least 10 [percent] by the end of fiscal year 2022 in order to improve product competitiveness by focusing investment on global core models and strategic regional models.

While some of these initiatives are already underway, the company expects that substantial improvements in its performance will take time.

During the announcement’s press conference, CEO Hiroto Saikawa admitted the results were worse than expected but reminded the media that the company’s restructuring efforts were already underway. Of the 12,500 job cuts, 4,800 had already been announced earlier in the year.

An estimated 6,400 of the total staffing reductions are to commence immediately. Roughly 1,500 will take place in the United States, with another 1,000 in Mexico and 830 in Japan. The rest are spread out between the United Kingdom, Spain, Indonesia, and India.

Those reductions are supposed to be finalized before April of 2020. Saikawa said to expect the remaining layoffs to wrap in 2023. Details on those were scant, however.

Nissan’s net income dropped 95 percent to 6.4 billion yen ($59.3 million) during the last quarter. Revenue slid 13 percent to 2.37 trillion yen ($21.97 billion) in the three months ending in June, with global retail volume declining by 6.0 percent. The automaker addressed the generally negative trend within the industry claiming it’s own profitability was “negatively impacted by the decrease in revenues and external factors such as raw material costs, exchange rate fluctuations and investments to meet regulatory standards.”

Its current goals involve improving capacity utilization worldwide and weening itself off fleet sales and heavy incentive spending in the United States. Saikawa said it would take some time for the changes to take effect.

[Image: Anton Watman/Shutterstock]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 45 comments
  • Ravenuer Ravenuer on Jul 27, 2019

    Hands down, the best car I've ever owned was a 1996 Maxima GXE. It was fast, quiet, handled decent, good gas mileage, comfortable. Not to mention dead-reliable. Put 300k on it when the tinworm got the radiator support and I figured it didn't owe me a cent.

  • Redgolf Redgolf on Jul 28, 2019

    No layoffs at the Nissan plant here in Smyrna, Tn.

  • ToolGuy First picture: I realize that opinions vary on the height of modern trucks, but that entry door on the building is 80 inches tall and hits just below the headlights. Does anyone really believe this is reasonable?Second picture: I do not believe that is a good parking spot to be able to access the bed storage. More specifically, how do you plan to unload topsoil with the truck parked like that? Maybe you kids are taller than me.
  • ToolGuy The other day I attempted to check the engine oil in one of my old embarrassing vehicles and I guess the red shop towel I used wasn't genuine Snap-on (lots of counterfeits floating around) plus my driveway isn't completely level and long story short, the engine seized 3 minutes later.No more used cars for me, and nothing but dealer service from here on in (the journalists were right).
  • Doughboy Wow, Merc knocks it out of the park with their naming convention… again. /s
  • Doughboy I’ve seen car bras before, but never car beards. ZZ Top would be proud.
  • Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.
Next