Flurry of Trademark Applications Points to Ford Ranger Trim Buffet

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Do you find yourself wishing Ford turned up the heat on the Ranger pickup, perhaps offering customers a choice of powerplants and greater diversity in appearances? You’re likely in luck.

According to U.S. trademark applications filed late this month, the Blue Oval has just gotten started with its new midsizer, though anyone waiting patiently for the Raptor variant already offered overseas will have to remain on ice.

Ford wants the names Wildtrack, Badlands, and Adrenaline added to its corporate word bin. It’s a no-brainer where the automaker intends those monikers to land — as Ford Authority (which uncovered the filings) notes, Ford already sells a Ranger Wildtrack in Australia and parts of Africa, where the model fills the trim space between XLT and Raptor.

Like Ram’s 1500 Rebel, the Ranger Wildtrack differentiates itself with a trim-specific grille, adding larger wheels and appearance goodies for good measure. In those markets, the Wildtrack comes only in 4×4 crew cab guise. As for Badlands, rival General Motors attempted to secure a trademark for the butchy name a few years back, then gave up on the effort. Don’t bisons roam freely in the Badlands? One wonders if, in the absence of the Raptor, Ford wants to upgrade the Ranger’s off-road chops to do battle with Chevrolet’s Colorado ZR2 and ZR2 Bison.

“Adrenaline,” one can assume, heralds a sportier — and perhaps more powerful — Ranger variant, though Ford hasn’t breathed an official word about additional engines supplementing the pickup’s stock 2.3-liter turbo four. The variant had better boast 1990s-style graphics…

Other trademark filings cropped up in July, among them applications for Bronco Sport and Mach 1. Perhaps Ford still plans to give its upcoming electric sport crossover a blasphemous name, or maybe it just needs to keep Mach 1 in the company fold for heritage preservation. As for Bronco Sport, the moniker joins Bronco Scout in the Ford trademark club. Whether it lands on the unibody, Escape-based version or the real BOF deal remains to be seen.

[Images: Ford]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 9 comments
  • PrincipalDan PrincipalDan on Jul 30, 2019

    Ford Ranger Adrenaline - If You're Not Breathing Heavy, You're not Doing it Right. (TM) ;-)

  • Eng_alvarado90 Eng_alvarado90 on Jul 31, 2019

    “Adrenaline,” one can assume, heralds a sportier — and perhaps more powerful — Ranger variant, though Ford hasn’t breathed an official word about additional engines supplementing the pickup’s stock 2.3-liter turbo four. The variant had better boast 1990s-style graphics… Wasn't that 1990s package called Splash? I want my neon graphics, flareside bed and extra bright paintjobs back. AFAIK the Adrenaline was only offered in Explorer and Explorer Sport Tracs from the late 2000s.

  • ToolGuy First picture: I realize that opinions vary on the height of modern trucks, but that entry door on the building is 80 inches tall and hits just below the headlights. Does anyone really believe this is reasonable?Second picture: I do not believe that is a good parking spot to be able to access the bed storage. More specifically, how do you plan to unload topsoil with the truck parked like that? Maybe you kids are taller than me.
  • ToolGuy The other day I attempted to check the engine oil in one of my old embarrassing vehicles and I guess the red shop towel I used wasn't genuine Snap-on (lots of counterfeits floating around) plus my driveway isn't completely level and long story short, the engine seized 3 minutes later.No more used cars for me, and nothing but dealer service from here on in (the journalists were right).
  • Doughboy Wow, Merc knocks it out of the park with their naming convention… again. /s
  • Doughboy I’ve seen car bras before, but never car beards. ZZ Top would be proud.
  • Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.
Next